ndidates i snd provide were able to describe two forms of teacher-student interactions ind provi ons general description of student-student interaction. Candidate: p teacher—student interactions as (1) behavior-oriented and (2) int inter- at facilita $ dent responses. Three out of 19 candidates desc b d actions th ted tu. r1be teacher—student i i os nteractions as “disciplinarian,’“ : narian,” “enforcing th ” ee e rules” and “enfor C- ing the rules set.” These candidates were described as having a d i edge of teacher—student interactions. Ba cevcloping nowt Four ou i ons vor 2 canes atendsd to specific student-student interactions. ene candicate nore’ aia s Me ents aided each other as the practitioner walked veleatateneed wre of ng for answer to the warm-up question; however, whe analogies ood ceamole a me language, the ability to clarify directions and ane anges xamples used by students were not described. There were no questions that students or the practitioner asked, analogi
This is what I have been sharing with my teacher recently. How do we include more student to studnet interaction so they can own their learning and teachers can become facilitators of learning. there is room for both.