5 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. We tend to look at a person’s face when we are listening to them. Again, this often makes people feel uncomfortable and contributes to their overall speaking anxiety. Many speakers don’t like the feeling of having “all eyes” on them, even though having a room full of people avoiding making eye contact with you would be much more awkward. Remember, it’s a good thing for audience members to look at you, because it means they’re paying attention and interested. Audiences look toward the face of the speaker for cues about the tone and content of the speech.

      This reading emphasizes the importance of facial expressions in public speaking and how they help communicate emotion, enthusiasm, and credibility. I found it interesting that many speakers unintentionally adopt a “deadpan” expression when presenting, even if they are passionate about their topic. Facial expressions set the emotional tone of a speech, and when they don’t match the content, audiences may become confused or question the speaker’s sincerity. The suggestion to record and evaluate oneself highlights the connection between self-awareness and improving delivery skills.

    1. When memorizing, most people use rote memorization techniques, which entail reading and then reciting something over and over until it is committed to memory. One major downfall of this technique is its effect on speaking rate. When we memorize this way, we end up going over the early parts of a speech many more times than the later parts. As you memorize one sentence, you add on another, and so on. By the time you’re adding on later parts of your speech, you are likely speed talking through the earlier parts because you know them by heart at that point. As we’ll discuss more later, to prevent bad habits from practice from hurting our speech delivery, speakers should practice a speech the exact way they want to deliver it to their audience. Fast-paced speaking during practice will likely make its way into the actual delivery of the speech. Delivery also suffers when speaking from memory if the speaker sounds like he or she is reciting the speech. Rote memorization tasks that many of us had to do in school have left their mark on our memorized delivery. Being made to recite the pledge of allegiance, the preamble to the Constitution, and so on didn’t enhance our speaking abilities. I’ve observed many students whose speeches remind me of the sound of school children flatly going through the motions of reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. It’s the “going through the motions” impression that speakers should want to avoid.

      The discussion of memorized delivery highlights how relying too heavily on memory can negatively affect delivery, especially when speakers use rote memorization. This method can lead to unnatural pacing, monotone delivery, and increased anxiety if the speaker forgets a section. The reading emphasizes that effective delivery is not just about remembering words but about engaging the audience through vocal variety, eye contact, and adaptability. Overall, the section reinforces the idea that choosing the appropriate delivery method is a strategic decision based on context, audience, and purpose.

    2. In what situations would impromptu speaking be used? Since we’ve already started thinking of the similarities between public speaking and conversations, we can clearly see that most of our day-to-day interactions involve impromptu speaking. When your roommate asks you what your plans for the weekend are, you don’t pull a few note cards out of your back pocket to prompt your response. This type of conversational impromptu speaking isn’t anxiety inducing because we’re talking about our lives, experiences, or something we’re familiar with. This is also usually the case when we are asked to speak publicly with little to no advance warning. For example, if you are at a meeting for work and you are representing the public relations department, a colleague may ask you to say a few words about a recent news story involving a public relations misstep of a competing company. In this case, you are being asked to speak on the spot because of your expertise. A competent communicator should anticipate instances like this when they might be called on to speak, so they won’t be so surprised. Of course, being caught completely off guard or being asked to comment on something unfamiliar to you creates more anxiety. In such cases, do not pretend to know something you don’t, as that may come back to hurt you later. You can usually mention that you do not have the necessary background information at that time but will follow up later with your comments.

      This reading explains that each delivery method—impromptu, manuscript, and memorized—has specific strengths and weaknesses depending on the speaking situation. I found it interesting that impromptu speaking, although anxiety-inducing, can actually strengthen public speaking skills because it forces speakers to think quickly and organize ideas on the spot. However, it also carries the risk of rambling or overstating knowledge. Manuscript delivery, on the other hand, offers precision and consistency, especially for complex information, but often reduces audience engagement because the speaker may sound like they are reading rather than speaking naturally.

    1. Last, positive visualization is another way to engage in cognitive restructuring. Speaking anxiety often leads people to view public speaking negatively. They are more likely to judge a speech they gave negatively, even if it was good. They’re also likely to set up negative self-fulfilling prophecies that will hinder their performance in future speeches. To effectively use positive visualization, it’s best to engage first in some relaxation exercises such as deep breathing or stretching, which we will discuss more later, and then play through vivid images in your mind of giving a successful speech. This should be done a few times before giving the actual speech. Students sometimes question the power of positive visualization, thinking that it sounds corny. Ask an Olympic diver what his or her coach says to do before jumping off the diving board and the answer will probably be “Coach says to image completing a perfect 10 dive.” Likewise a Marine sharpshooter would likely say his commanding officer says to imagine hitting the target before pulling the trigger. In both instances, positive visualization is being used in high-stakes situations. If it’s good enough for Olympic athletes and snipers, it’s good enough for public speakers.

      The strategies for addressing public speaking anxiety—systematic desensitization, cognitive restructuring, and skills training—show that anxiety can be managed with practice and mindset changes. I think the idea of communication-orientation modification therapy (COM therapy) is especially helpful because it reframes public speaking as a conversation rather than a performance. This connects to the concept of positive visualization and goal-setting, which build confidence over time. Overall, the reading suggests that while we can’t eliminate anxiety completely, we can control how we respond to it and improve through intentional practice and reflection.

    2. Public speaking anxiety is a type of CA that produces physiological, cognitive, and behavioral reactions in people when faced with a real or imagined presentation (Bodie, 2010). Physiological responses to public speaking anxiety include increased heart rate, flushing of the skin or face, and sweaty palms, among other things. These reactions are the result of natural chemical processes in the human body. The fight or flight instinct helped early humans survive threatening situations. When faced with a ferocious saber-toothed tiger, for example, the body released adrenaline, cortisol, and other hormones that increased heart rate and blood pressure to get more energy to the brain, organs, and muscles in order to respond to the threat. We can be thankful for this evolutionary advantage, but our physiology hasn’t caught up with our new ways of life. Our body doesn’t distinguish between the causes of stressful situations, so facing down an audience releases the same hormones as facing down a wild beast.

      This reading explains that public speaking anxiety is a common form of communication apprehension (CA), which can be either trait-based (part of someone’s personality) or state-based (triggered by a specific situation). I found it interesting that the body reacts to public speaking the same way it would to a life-threatening danger because of the fight-or-flight response. The physiological reactions—like sweating, increased heart rate, and shaking—combine with negative thoughts such as fear of judgment, which can then lead to avoidance behaviors. This helps me understand that speaking anxiety is not just “being nervous,” but a complex mix of physical, cognitive, and behavioral responses.