In this way, the “good” question for a systematic review is unanswered but seemingly answerable.
Anserable
In this way, the “good” question for a systematic review is unanswered but seemingly answerable.
Anserable
extensive vocabulary
most challenging
He also advises that roughly three-fourths of thetotal number of participants should share a similar code between them (related to an experience oropinion found in their data) for a “commonality” to be established, such as a category or theme. Butmy own experience has taught me that, in some cases, that unique instance of a code that appears justonce and nowhere else in the data corpus, or a code that appears just two or three times acrossdifferent cases or time periods, may hold important meaning for generating a significant insight inlater analysis.
impressive
tween angst
I didn't know this expression before.
Researchers from theseparadigms would argue that just because data all converge onthe same conclusion, this does not assure that this specifiedreality is correct.
surprise!
Data Analysis and Representation by Research Approaches
reference 2
General Data Analysis Strategies Advanced by Select Author
reference1
igure 8.6 Template for Coding a Phenomenological Study
useful2
This approach is often selected because when a researcher maximizes differences at the beginning ofthe study, it increases the likelihood that the findings will reflect differences or different perspectives—anideal in qualitative research.
A big difference between qualitative and quantitative methods. What kind of differences are included here?
Stepwise multiple regression
In what cases should we use stepwise multiple regression directly?
(b= 3.943
why?
upport the writing of the dissertation during the last year(s) of doctoral work
When is the best time to apply for funding?
Iteration also addresses the problem of over-collecting data.
How/why iteration works
Before reading this article, I wondered why this article is in Week 10 since it introduces more history and definition of DBR. We can read this first for this class. But after finishing reading this article, I feel we will have a deeper understanding of DBR and its limitations. In addition, this article will provide more practical suggestions for our project.
scholars begin articulating which of theseapproaches they are using in that particular study. This can simplify the requirements on DBRresearchers, because instead of feeling the necessity of doing all three in every paper, they canemphasize one.
Are most DBRs focused on through design? This reminds me of Chris's different papers on the same project. They seem to have different purpose and focus.
dentify strategies in IDR that could benefit DBRdevelopment.
How do you describe the relations between IDR and DBR?
all discrete decisions
At least the major decisions should be recorded. Discrete decisions can be coded into different themes to be presented in general summaries.
ensuring that researchers can make credible andtrustworthy assertions is a challenge
Consistent communication within the community numbers may decrease this challenge.
researchfor design (e.g., research with the intent of gathering data to supportproduct development) to researchondesign (e.g., research exploring the design process
The essence of the development of DBR. I will pay attention to the following questions when reading the left article. What makes this change, and how it benefits design?
perpetual servitude
永久奴役
Research demonstrates that preschool children define play as activitythat is freely chosen and self-directed. Surprisingly, children do notoften define play as being something that is necessarily fun
Children seek autonomy in play.
Our approach to defining play is often based on adultviews of what play looks like, rather than taking the child’s per-spective, and play means different things to different people atdifferent times
That's really important. We cannot deny play or define it in a certain way.
slog
love this idea
t is critical to document the nature ofthose failures, and the attempted revisions, as well as the overall results of the experiment.
Reminds me of Productive Failuress https://www.manukapur.com/productive-failure/#:~:text=What%20is%20Productive%20Failure%3F,for%20solving%20complex%2C%20novel%20problems.
To be scientific, the design must allow direct, empirical investigation of an important question, account for the context in which the study is carried out, align with a conceptual framework, reflect careful and thorough reasoning, and disclose results to encourage debate in the scientific community.
Seems like the good standards for the intervention.
require long-term partnerships between research and practice
That's also my worries.
Since all studies rely on a limited set of observations, a key question is how individual findings generalize to broader populations and settings
When we design intervention for real context, should we consider generalizations too? Is this a standard to evaluate our DBR intervention?