27 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2024
  2. Feb 2023
    1. He also advises that roughly three-fourths of thetotal number of participants should share a similar code between them (related to an experience oropinion found in their data) for a “commonality” to be established, such as a category or theme. Butmy own experience has taught me that, in some cases, that unique instance of a code that appears justonce and nowhere else in the data corpus, or a code that appears just two or three times acrossdifferent cases or time periods, may hold important meaning for generating a significant insight inlater analysis.

      impressive

    Annotators

    1. Researchers from theseparadigms would argue that just because data all converge onthe same conclusion, this does not assure that this specifiedreality is correct.

      surprise!

    Annotators

    1. This approach is often selected because when a researcher maximizes differences at the beginning ofthe study, it increases the likelihood that the findings will reflect differences or different perspectives—anideal in qualitative research.

      A big difference between qualitative and quantitative methods. What kind of differences are included here?

    Annotators

    Annotators

  3. Nov 2022
    1. Before reading this article, I wondered why this article is in Week 10 since it introduces more history and definition of DBR. We can read this first for this class. But after finishing reading this article, I feel we will have a deeper understanding of DBR and its limitations. In addition, this article will provide more practical suggestions for our project.

    2. scholars begin articulating which of theseapproaches they are using in that particular study. This can simplify the requirements on DBRresearchers, because instead of feeling the necessity of doing all three in every paper, they canemphasize one.

      Are most DBRs focused on through design? This reminds me of Chris's different papers on the same project. They seem to have different purpose and focus.

    3. all discrete decisions

      At least the major decisions should be recorded. Discrete decisions can be coded into different themes to be presented in general summaries.

    4. ensuring that researchers can make credible andtrustworthy assertions is a challenge

      Consistent communication within the community numbers may decrease this challenge.

    5. researchfor design (e.g., research with the intent of gathering data to supportproduct development) to researchondesign (e.g., research exploring the design process

      The essence of the development of DBR. I will pay attention to the following questions when reading the left article. What makes this change, and how it benefits design?

  4. Sep 2022
    1. Research demonstrates that preschool children define play as activitythat is freely chosen and self-directed. Surprisingly, children do notoften define play as being something that is necessarily fun

      Children seek autonomy in play.

    2. Our approach to defining play is often based on adultviews of what play looks like, rather than taking the child’s per-spective, and play means different things to different people atdifferent times

      That's really important. We cannot deny play or define it in a certain way.

    Annotators

    1. To be scientific, the design must allow direct, empirical investigation of an important question, account for the context in which the study is carried out, align with a conceptual framework, reflect careful and thorough reasoning, and disclose results to encourage debate in the scientific community.

      Seems like the good standards for the intervention.

    2. Since all studies rely on a limited set of observations, a key question is how individual findings generalize to broader populations and settings

      When we design intervention for real context, should we consider generalizations too? Is this a standard to evaluate our DBR intervention?