13 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2019
    1. more negative

      shouldn't this be more positive? (the CI is 0,043; 0,302) And the unstandardized regression coefficient is 0,172.

    2. 0.12 to 0.34 point

      Waarom noem je hier twee keer de Confidence interval en niet een keer de ongestandaardiseerde regressiecoefficient (van 0,23)?

    1. BY status3 exposure3

      Does this sequence matter? The assignment doesn't really say what is the moderator en what the predictor?


      Maakt deze volgorde uit in de syntax? (bij mij staat er eerst descriptive en dan homogeneity)

    1. Squaring, summing, and averaging the solid red arrows (within-groups differences) yields the within-groups variance

      Can you explain this? Or can you give an example?

    1. (Standard) normal distribution one or two means > 100 t distribution one or two means each group > 30

      What is the difference between these two? When does your sample have to contain >100 people (because when you test 2 means you have 2 groups and do a t-test right, so each group has to be over 30 so a minimum of 60?)


      Hoe krijg ik dit in mijn syntax erbij? Zodat je niet die hele tabel Candy weight krijgt? En is dit belangrijk voor in het tentamen?

    1. When political cynicism is added as a predictor, the negative effect of education becomes stronger. In the model without political cynicism, political cynicism suppressed part of the effect of education

      I get that political cynicism is a surpresser here, but it is also negative so I don't get how it can surpress another negative variable?

    1. of the confounder (age) on the dependent variable (newspaper reading time)

      Is dat in het figuur dan 0.83 of 0.04?

    2. is most strongly related to both political interest

      Is 'education' niet het meest sterk gerelateerd aan politieke interesse? Deze heeft een waarde van 0.28 en age een van 0.12?