Finding a safe space online that allows people to explore parts of themselves that are not readily available in public has positive implications for mental health. Such Spaces provide an opportunity for people to express themselves and get support without fear of scrutiny or negative judgment. However, ensuring that this environment is safe and positive is key, otherwise it may backfire.

According to these contents, social media can promote mental health by building healthy communities. And it provides support and a sense of belonging that helps people cope with life's challenges. However, if the community becomes toxic, it can have a negative impact on mental health.

In the context of social media, replication refers to the process where content, or a modified version of it, is shared and distributed across platforms, reaching more viewers. When users share or remix content, the new version may include changes or additions, which are then carried forward as the content continues to spread. This creates a cycle where the modified version becomes the basis for future iterations, allowing both the original and the altered content to reach even larger audiences over time.

Knowing how recommendation algorithms work, users - especially content creators - will often adjust their strategies to expand their content, such as by increasing engagement and using trending topics. This is critical for creators who rely on social media for income, as higher visibility can lead to more opportunities for monetization. However, this also raises ethical issues, as it can sometimes encourage sensationalism or low-quality content exploitation systems.

It's essential that Design Justice emphasizes not only the outcome of design but who is involved in the process. If only dominant groups are part of the decision-making, we risk creating systems that unintentionally harm or exclude marginalized groups. Ensuring that all voices are represented can lead to more inclusive, equitable design solutions that truly serve diverse communities.

When people post about others without their permission, it can lead to serious privacy violations. For example, sharing personal moments or information without consent can damage relationships and put people at risk. This is especially true with parents oversharing about their kids (“sharenting”), as it can affect the child’s future without their knowledge or agreement.

It's really scary to think that just by looking at who your friends are, people can speculate about your personal life, like your sexual orientation. It makes me feel like social media knows too much about us. I think platforms need to do a better job of keeping our private information safe so it's not used in ways we don't want.

Sartre’s exploration of “Bad Faith” highlights a significant issue with inauthentic arguments, especially in modern trolling behavior. People who engage in trolling often present arguments they don’t truly believe, either for attention or to provoke others. This concept of knowingly spreading falsehoods or engaging in self-deception resonates with many of the harmful dynamics we see in online spaces today, where authenticity and accountability are often lacking.

As discussed in the article, inauthentic behavior is increasingly concerning in today’s social media. Examples of law enforcement phishing and trumpet accounts demonstrate how easy it is to manipulate others by forging identities. Not only do these tactics deceive individuals, they also exacerbate the spread of misinformation and further undermine users’ trust in the platform. This is a reminder that stronger systems should be in place to authenticate users and prevent these harmful behaviors from occurring.

Although 4Chan is known for "free speech," it has also sparked discussions about online responsibility and ethics. How to protect freedom of speech while avoiding the spread of malicious and harmful behaviors on the Internet is a question worth pondering.

Dictionaries are very useful when working with social media data. Especially when we need to organize multiple pieces of user information (such as username, avatar, watch list, etc.) to edit code, it provides a flexible way to quickly access and manage this data.

We need to be careful when simplifying data, just like painting a picture, sometimes we forget to paint some important parts. If we don't pay attention to these omissions, it may lead us to make wrong decisions or be unfair to some people, so think carefully about what important things are being overlooked every time you simplify.

All data is a simplification of reality, just like drawing a map. It looks simple on the map, but in fact each line represents many different things. Because the data is collected through specific standards or frameworks. Data cannot tell us everything, it can only tell us part of it, so when we look at the data, we must remember that it cannot show everything (limitations).

The computer is "sitting and doing nothing" waiting for an event to happen, which means that when the user is using it, it is important to respond quickly. Even though a computer may appear to be idle, ensuring it can respond promptly when an event occurs is critical to improving the user experience.

The gap between intention and behavior is an important issue. While we can look separately at what the robot did and what the person behind it intended to do, the two are not necessarily the same, making it difficult to say who is responsible. So, we may need clearer rules when using these automated things.

The article mentioned that rights come from "the Creator," sparking discussion about the separation of religion and government. Because the government should not consider any religion when formulating laws and policies, but should remain neutral and ensure that all citizens enjoy equal rights and treatment regardless of religious background. It also makes people think about how these natural rights should be understood and interpreted in a secular society.

Taking non-coercive action is not the same as inaction, but a way of action that is appropriate. It is said here that it does not interfere at all, but it is better to say that it takes appropriate action according to the situation. Instead of simply “Trying to force something to happen will likely backfire”.