to derive it from nothing wasmanifestly impossible
This reminds me of how people talk about infinity we can’t observe it directly, but we believe in it because we can understand the concept in our minds.
to derive it from nothing wasmanifestly impossible
This reminds me of how people talk about infinity we can’t observe it directly, but we believe in it because we can understand the concept in our minds.
to explain myself in one word, God.
Could Descartes be saying that the existence of God is proven simply by the fact that we can imagine a perfect being?
here is difficulty only in seeing plainlywhich things they are that we conceive distinctly
I think the point is that if something is completely clear and makes perfect sense to your mind, then you can trust it to be true.
he things which we conceive very clearlyand very distinctly are all true,
I can see what he is talking about now
depends on no material thing
Confused
the soul by which I am what I am, is entirely distinct from the body
I didn’t expect Descartes to dive into the mind-body separation so quickly it feels like a big philosophical leap early in the text.
I should borrow all the best in geometricalanalysis, and in algebra, and correct all the faults of the one by means of the other.
Coming back to the algebra connections.
I think
I wonder if Descartes is saying that thinking is the only proof of existence. Can feelings or senses count too?
everything to be false, I, who thought, must of necessity be something;
It’s like building a house from scratch — even if everything else collapses, the one solid block left is the fact that I’m thinking.
abstain from receiv-ing as true any opinions which are not true,
I think this is leading up to a bigger argument about how truth works not just in math, but in philosophy too.
that I should be sure of omitting nothing
Main idea with these four rules is that Descartes is trying to create a clear and dependable way to find truth by using reason.
to make everywhere enumerations so complete,
I don't understand what this meant but I will check back on it
to conduct my thoughts in order, by beginning with the simplestobjects,
This reminds me chemistry. When you need to identify something, you start breaking it down until you find the core value, so in this case his thoughts.
divide each of the difficulties which I should examine into asmany portions as were possible
Descartes has set laws for governing.
never to accept anything as true when I did not recognize it clearlyto be so
Interesting phrase, need to understand this more deeper
This made methink that some other method must be sought, which, while combining the advan-tages of these three, should be free from their defects.
I’m going to reread this section to better understand how Descartes compares the ancient and modern approaches.
confused and obscure art
I was confused when Descartes said algebra was a confusing and obscure art — I’ve always seen it as something that helps make things clearer, not harder to understand.
go so slowly
This piece reminds me of sports, when you first start slow you need to check if you are doing your form/steps correctly before moving on
not advance speedily
This connects with the first phrase and is also how when practicing your steps or form you don't want to go to fast or you might fail.
keep from falling.
Now we transition to not failing the form/step.