Often, inductive arguments might present evidence that is suggestive, intriguing or compelling
Inductive arguments are described as strong or weak not good or bad. Somewhat like looking at a balance between the two in the examples provided.
Often, inductive arguments might present evidence that is suggestive, intriguing or compelling
Inductive arguments are described as strong or weak not good or bad. Somewhat like looking at a balance between the two in the examples provided.
how can doctors and therapists collaborate to learn more about the links between physical and mental health?”
Very interesting topic! This is something that I would enjoy furthering my knowledge about.
Sometimes we see value not in the content of the argument but in the focus it brings to a topic.
This is what makes an argument more intriguing and interests the reader, because when we genuinely are interested about the topic we willingly read. We usually pick up more information on the topic and more likely to remember it.
We might conclude that an argument is not valid, but still see ways in which this argument can help us get closer to the truth on a particular topic.
This is the answer to the main topic question, "why look for strengths if the argument is flawed?" This can be useful for general conversations and keeps it going rather than shutting it down.