This whole section from the article is a very complex dilemma and it stood out to me the most. From a justice lens, ff the U.S. slows down while China continues to improve in AI, that can risk us losing technological and military edge. There's already a deep distrust between the two countries, and, it might be true, I don't know, but I strongly believe that they could view our negotiation to slow down as a way to lock in our dominance and hinder their advancements, and economy. With Trump still being in office for two more years, and him stating that whoever wins AI, wins, make all of this even more difficult and, not to mention, that things can be hidden in data centers. From a common good lens, as mentioned in the article, slowing things down can prevent cyberattacks or bioweapons. I believe, globally, we all don't want an existential tech disaster to happen, but I think we won't realize that completely until we're almost there. It's all about money, unfortunately, until we get to that point. While there's no need for a permanent freeze, and as suggested in the article, focusing on specific redlines can be helpful during these negotiations. It's common sense, or at least it should be, that using AI for nuclear development or, I mean there already are, robots that become autonomous killers are things we want to prevent. There's already a huge backlash against data centers, and I believe, somewhere down the line, political parties will have to set a baseline for what AI can be used for to secure elections and votes.