37 Matching Annotations
  1. Aug 2020
    1. But, most importantly, they are to use the expertise of other students and the teacher in the classroom. I would also suggest including elements of abstracted replay, or viewing the work of experts as they revise and edit their own work process and product

      I find this to be a much more realistic representation of life outside of school. Most frequently, you are being tasked to take existing ideas, combine them, improve upon them, and adapt them to your needs. The times when you are asked to come up with something completely new and original are few. #cofcedu

    2. In thinking about this question, I may be splitting hairs, but I believe that the word choice involved in identifying construction as opposed to creation is also of the utmost importance.

      Always is. So much of our intended meaning or definition changes when word/term selection is off. #COFCEDU

  2. Jul 2020
    1. I do have concerns about the "rabbit holes" students can go down while performing internet based research. One of the best things about the traditional textbook format is the structure and direction it provides students. #cofcedu

    2. Her science book, for example, was divided into chapters, each chapter was broken into sections, and she could answer the first question at the end of each section by looking for the first bold word. The structure of the textbook was a map that Sarah could easily follow. After thinking about Sarah, Mrs. Pomona realized it did not work that way online. No one gave students a map for Internet inquiry. Students needed a sextant, a tool for navigation, to guide them.

      This still occurs in college level courses. Students want a straight forward list of questions so they can go through a reading systematically and find the answers to the questions. This gets the assignment done and ensures a good grade. None of that involves thinking, understand, or applying the information. #cofcedu

    1. There are a variety of ways to make Internet Inquiry Projects happen in your classroom. Once again, this model is appropriate, and very much needed, from Pre-K up through higher ed

      This is one of the best parts about these exercises. They can be modified for any age group, any skill level, any content area. Even when adjusting for the differences found within the same class. #cofcedu

    2. This process involves the following five phases: Students collaboratively (with the instructor) identify an area of interest and co-construct a driving question to guide inquiry. Students engage in online collaborative inquiry as they search and sift through online texts using digital tools to address their focus of inquiry. Students critically evaluate online information by considering the credibility (truthfulness) and validity (usefulness) of the information obtained. Students synthesize what they have learned during their online inquiry by actively curating and synthesizing information across multiple, multimodal sources. Student engage in online content construction by synthesizing what they have learned and selecting the best digital text or tool before sharing this answer.

      I've definitely grown to appreciate WebQuest activities. An excellent exercise for finding new information but also evaluating the quality of it. #cofcedu

    1. We would use narrative text.•We would teach inferential reasoning about setting, events, problems, solutions, characters, etc.•Typical discussion questions might include:ƒ|Tell us what you think will happen next?ƒ|What evidence in your text suggests this answer?•We would use informational text such as search engine results.•We would teach how to infer information from search result listings.•Typical discussion questions might include:ƒ|Which of these sites is a commercial site?ƒ|What evidence in the text suggests this?ƒ|Which of these sites comes from England? Which comes from Minnesota?ƒ|What evidence in the text suggests this?

      I wish for the digital and traditional text the first element was evaluating the "truth" or "quality" of the presented information. #cofcedu

    2. nother way of looking at this issue is to suggest that many educators will read the CCSS only with a lens to our past, and not a lens to our future, failing to include instruction in important online reading skills. F

      This must be me because I just don't get this entire article. Sorry. #cofcedu

    3. This initiative recognizes the reading has changed and that online reading is a problem-solving task, requiring new skills to locate, evaluate, synthesize, and communicate in online contexts. It describes these new online literacies as

      Reading has not changed. Reading is still reading. What has changed is the availability and quality of the information available to read. Reading has not changed, thinking and analyzing the information you have just read is what has become more difficult. #cofcedu

    4. How can we develop adequate understanding when the very object that we seek to study continuously changes?

      This isn't a unique conundrum. Its the same problem faced by anyone involved in science, technology, mathematics, or society. These things are always changing. Sometime the pace of change slows or quickens, but its still changing and evolving nonetheless. You develop adequate understanding through focused effort and remaining flexible to that evolution. #cofcedu

    5. However, this does not nec-essarily mean they are skilled in the effective use of online information, perhaps the most important aspect of the Internet. Studies show that stu-dents lack critical evaluation skills when reading online (Bennet, Maton, & Kervin, 2008; Forzani & Maykel, 2013; Graham & Metaxas, 2003) and that they are not especially skilled with reading to locate information online (Kuiper & Volman, 2008)

      Its teaching them how to be responsible members of the online community. How to use and contribute to the information available online responsibly and ethically. Its teaching them how to sort through the crap to find the quality. #cofcedu

    6. It is clear that the nature of literacy regularly and continuously changes in online spaces.

      Nope. Literacy does not change. The tools we use to demonstrate our literacy changes, but literacy is fundamentally the ability to read and write in a specific language. Its a small but an important distinction. Just because I can now write and read blogs on a website vs. reading the opinion section in a newspaper or magazine does not change the fact that I am still reading and writing. All that's changed is the medium. #cofcedu

    7. The Internet is a very disruptive technology (Christensen, 1997), alter-ing traditional elements of our society from newspapers to music.

      Not sure I agree with this statement. I think the internet just changed the delivery method. Music is still music, now its just delivered digitally as opposed to in a hard format such as a CD. Same with written products. You still sit down and read something except now its on a computer screen instead of a magazine or newspaper or book. #cofcedu

    1. but the real learning gains result from engaging students in learning experiences that could not be accomplished without technology.

      This could really be the subject for this entire Tech in Ed course. Its almost perfect. I would only modify it to include instances where technology enhances understanding.

      COFCEDU

    1. TPK becomes particularly important because most popular software programs are not designed for educational purposes. Software programs such as the Microsoft Office Suite (Word, PowerPoint, Excel, Entourage, and MSN Messenger) are usually designed for business environments.

      This is interesting because virtually everything is based off of the Microsoft office suite base. Even Google's Classroom and suite of programs like Google Docs looks like Office clones. We use these as the base technologies for organizing and running classrooms yet they are designed for the business world, not the classroom. #COFCEDU

    2. teachers should understand the deeper knowledge fundamentals of the disciplines in which they teach.

      Students can absolutely see right through the teacher who has just memorized the info on the slides for that presentation and cannot answer questions or provide in depth information. You can't just memorize the information and repeat it in front of the students. You must first fully understand the information yourself before you can teach it to others and make the lesson relatable. #COFCEDU

    3. Many approaches to teachers’ professional development offer a one-size-fits-all approach to technology integration when, in fact, teachers operate in diverse contexts of teaching and learning.

      This is a problem with professional development across many professions. Professionals are expected to expand their skillset and stay on the cutting edge of developments in their field in order to remain competitive in the job market or to compete for advancement. The problem is that most employers expect this to be done at your own expense and in your off time. It is framed as a personal investment in your own future. These investments should be a partnership between employers and professionals. Don't force teachers to spend their own money and sacrifice their off-time to participate in training which will improve their skillsets. Incentivize that process, share the costs, allow it to be accomplished during normal work hours as much as possible, and let them know there will be tangible benefit for mastery of new skills. #COFCEDU

    4. eachers often have inadequate (or inappropriate) experience with using digital technologies for teaching and learning. Many teachers earned degrees at a time when educational technology was at a very different stage of development than it is today.

      This was put on shocking display with the COVID 19 shutdowns. Across all age groups from my kid in kindergarten, to my teens in middle and high school, to myself in college courses, most educators were unable to effectively use the most basic technological tools to participate in distance learning. #COFCEDU

    5. Also complicating teaching with technology is an understanding that technologies are neither neutral nor unbiased. Rather, particular technologies have their own propensities, potentials, affordances, and constraints that make them more suitable for certain tasks than others

      Technology is a tool, not the lesson. Often, the use of new technology is forced upon teachers and takes away from their teaching. A person who has mastered their content and who has mastered their teaching skills might be able to engage students with lecture. Another may not have that ability and using some sort of technological tool helps them make that connection. Helping teachers and students connect or helping to illustrate points, that's when technology has value. #COFCEDU

    6. I believe the challenge also lies in ensuring you aren't just using the newest technology just for the sake of using it. There needs to be a tangible gain associated with using it. A pen is a more advanced technology than a pencil yet it is not the appropriate technology when teaching young students how to write. #cofcedu

    1. Organizations and adults must meet youth where they are in order to foster connected learning. They do this by being sponsors of what youth are genuinely interested in — recognizing diverse interests and providing mentorship, space, and other resources. <img src="https://clalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/block2.png">Shared PracticesOngoing shared activities are the backbone of connected learning. Through collaborative production, friendly competition, civic action, and joint research, youth and adults make things, have fun, learn, and make a difference together.

      This sounds like the exact purpose behind programs like magnet school programs, "space camps" or other summer workshops, or the aeronautical engineering program being sponsored and co-created here in Charleston by Boeing.

    2. Learning is motivating when it grows out of personal interest. A growing body of research indicates that interest helps us pay attention, make connections, persist and engage in deeper learning. For example, when reading about games they enjoy playing, teenage boys read at a much higher level than their reading level in school. <img src="https://clalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/relation.png" alt="Interests Icon">RelationshipsLearners need support from peers and mentors to persist through setbacks and challenges. A survey of 30,000 college graduates found that a strong connection to a faculty member doubled the positive life outcomes of graduates. Learn more about the power of interest-based mentorship in this infographic. <img src="https://clalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Opportun.png" alt="Interests Icon">OpportunitiesSuccess beyond the classroom requires tangible connections to real-world career and civic opportunities. The Digital Youth Network provided in- and out-of-school connected learning experiences to low-income students in Chicago. They surpassed their more wealthier peers, growing up in Silicon Valley, in 21st-century competencies and digital media engagement.

      This is a nice way to explain / paraphrase the topic, but none of this is really new information. Of course students are more interested in something and will persist when it interests them. Of course students will achieve when they connect with a mentor or peer or make some other personal connection related to something they are already interested in. Of course if that interest can correlate to a post education opportunity in the real world, students will most likely continue to pursue it. #cofcedu

  3. www.literacyworldwide.org www.literacyworldwide.org
    1. Although Wikipedia is not a scholarly source, it is usually a good enough first stop to learn about something. However, students need to know how it is updated. They need to recognize that there are back-channel discussions about what ends up appearing on the site. These discussions can be fraught with power dynamics, resulting in controversial issues appearing unbalanced as more powerful authors block alternative viewpoints.

      How about the fact that information on Wikipedia can be completely false sometimes? Isn't that a little more important than the power dynamics and unbalanced power?

      cofcedu

    2. do we remind them of the risks of placing their information online and give them choices of how much personal information to reveal?

      This must be emphasized more. The current concerns over Tik Tok and its popularity are a prime example.

      cofcedu

    3. Twitter plays a large role in my teaching, but the essential elements can be applied in many technological contexts.)

      I'm sorry I know my comments make me sound like an 80 year old curmudgeon and probably elicit a bunch of the "OK Boomer" responses, but seriously... Unless we are talking about marketing or other specific techniques for reaching massive amounts of people, the statement "Twitter plays a large role in my teaching" is going to make me cringe every time I hear it.

      cofcedu

    4. For example, teaching digital skills would include showing students how to download images from the Internet and insert them into PowerPoint slides or webpages. Digital literacy would focus on helping students choose appropriate images, recognize copyright licensing, and cite or get permissions, in addition to reminding students to use alternative text for images to support those with visual disabilities.

      This has been a major point of conflict for me so far. As I read the explanation of "Digital Literacy" to me it just sounds like skill proficiency. I hope this article shows clear differentiations between the two.

      cofcedu

    1. When most workers held jobs in industry, the key skills were knowing a trade, following directions, getting along with others, working hard, and being professional. To hold information-age jobs, people also need to think deeply about issues, solve problems creatively, work in teams, communicate clearly in many media, learn ever-changing technologies.

      This is a false statement...

      Workers in industry also needed to:

      -think deeply about issues -solve problems creatively -work in teams -communicate clearly -learn ever changing technologies

      The only thing that is different now is the multimedia aspect. That is just new venues for sharing the information. The rest of the skills are all the same.

      The skills they don't mention for modern technology age jobs that were the basis for industry age jobs:

      -knowing a trade (specialization) -following directions -getting along with others -working hard -being professional

      These are all just as necessary today as they were before.

      cofcedu

    2. Writing on the web enables one to build and create content to make meaning. New genres that blend texts and tools have emerged on the open web and are often referred to as making. 2 Learning through making involves constructing new content. Good online writers pick up tools while composing text through creating and curating content. In turn, the content they remix and modify drives the open web. The following skills and competencies of the writing strand reflect an emphasis on making.

      This aspect is also concerning to me...see Wikipedia. The great thing about the internet is the ability for everyone to contribute. The bad thing about the internet is the ability for everyone to continue. This is what has made evaluation such a critical skill.

      cofcedu

    3. Synthesize Integrating separate and unique information from multiple online sources. 21C Skills: Problem-solving, Communication Coalescing information shared on one webpage to make meaning. Incorporating information shared across two pages on one website to make meaning. Combining information shared across pages on two or more websites to make meaning. Integrating information of multiple modes across multiple websites to help solve a problem.

      This skill concerns me sometimes. When I see "Synthesize" I think it means finding and absorbing many different pieces of information/perspectives on the same topic so that you can improve a "big picture" or more complete understanding. Unfortunately, what I have seen in college is that "Synthesize" (in practice) means to take a bunch of ideas from other people's work and use their ideas to explain your thesis. The missing component is original thought. I want my students to experience a subject in as many ways as possible so they can develop their own understanding...their own original thought on the subject. Then you can go back and read what everyone else has already said about it so you can better understand your experiences and your original thoughts.

      cofcedu

    4. judge the credibility of these sources

      This is huge and one of the most important lessons young people need to learn. Evaluation of the source of information is critical and difficult. Social media has played a big part in making this skill even more necessary today.

      cofcedu

    5. 21C Skills of communication, creativity, collaboration, and problem-solving that are important cross-cutting leadership skills to move from being a consumer to a maker on the web.

      Is there ever a concern about making things too complicated? For example, just to perform this assignment, I must first understand and be proficient in the basic use of a computer. Then I must be proficient in the use of my school's student portal so that I may access this assignment. Then I must be proficient in the use of hypothesis. I must also be proficient in knowing how to install the hypothesis program with the correct browser so I may merge it with the PDF just so I can read it and make this comment. That's an awful lot of work when I can just read the document and take notes... I get that hypothesis allows for the quick sharing of ideas and collaboration, but was that a huge missing component? Was collaboration not happening before? My opposition isn't to new technological tools, its to make things "super techy" just because we can.

      I come from the workforce and frankly this type of stuff seems great in academia, but in the workforce, "Keep It Simple" is the name of the game.

      cofcedu

    6. I'm curious to understand why the word "literacy" was chosen as opposed to something like "proficiency". When I think of literacy, I think of reading and writing in a specific language. When I read the descriptions in this article of the various components of "Web Literacy" to me it sounds more like developing proficiency in skills which improve your ability to communicate / learn. To me it sounds like you must first be literate, then once you are literate, let's develop your proficiency with the web so you can enhance your learning and communication (literacy) skills. #cofcedu

  4. Jan 2020
    1. The Middle East is home to some of the richest as well as the poorest countriesinthe world but is, on average, much better off than sub-Saharan Africa and slightlybetter off than the global average. However, economic development in the Middle Easthas been oil dependent and state driven and has not followed the modernization path ofeconomic diversification, occupational specialization, and mass education (Inglehart1997). The Middle East is the world’s most oil-rich region (but does not rank as high inminerals).Middle Eastern countries stand out as extremely homogeneous, while Africancountries are highly fractionalized. Contrary to Collier and Hoeffler’s (2002) work onAfrica, we find that ethnic dominance increases the risk of conflict. The Middle Eastscores higher than Africa and the global average on ethnic dominance. However, asoriginally coded, this variable does not account for the divisions within Islam. Whenwe use our recoded variable (ethnic dominance, Islam), where countries with signifi-cant Shia minorities are given a 0, the Middle East scores much lower on ethnic domi-nance than Africa and the global average.Authoritarian and democratic regimes are generally less prone to conflict thanregimes with middle-range scores (Hegre et al. 2001; Fearon and Laitin 2003). BothAfrica and the Middle East score significantly less democratic than the global average.Populous countries are more prone to conflict, mainly because larger populationsare more likely to host more sources of conflict. Middle East countries are generallysmall, and population size does not account for conflicts in this region. We now addmodified ethnic dominance, regime type, and natural resource dependence to theanalysis.

      Results from statistical analysis.

    2. Can conflict in the Middle East be explained by factors that are unique to the MiddleEast? Or is the Middle East just an unfortunate region where conflict risk factors haveaccumulated?

      This is a central question

    Annotators