41 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2020
    1. On the negative side, itseems a little unusual to demand such self-reflection, stray-ing close to introspective methodology. On the positive side,one can view this as the need to document design strategies,and who better to do this than the designers? By documentingwhat it is like to try to make learning happen from the point ofview of those who would foster learning, we may be edgingtoward a more usable, and hence more valid, form ofresearch

      I believe there will always be a hint of personal agendas, emotions, and motivations that will have an impact on research no matter what. Since we are studying humans and how they learn, I feel like it only makes sense to include the affective side. We are complex, so looking at our learning through multiple lenses (including a behaviorist or sociology standpoint) only helps us fill in more of the picture.

    1. Ourconceptoffundsofknowledgeisinno-vative,webetieve,initsspecialrelevancetoteaching,andcontrastswiththemoregeneralterm“culture,”orwiththeconceptofa“culturesensitivecurriculum,”andwiththelatter’sreli-anceonfolkloricdisplays,suchasstorytelling,arts,crafts,anddanceperformance

      Yes. It is not just a holiday or a piece of art, the culture is made of people, human beings.

    1. the methods by which we evaluate how such computer-based tools are appropriated andtheir impact on learning, on the whole, do not take into consideration differential effects forgroups that differ by ethnicity, race, language use, or class. It is quite possible that the tremendousfunding being invested in the development of such computer-based tools in education may be sim-ply reinforcing current inequities in opportunities to learn, unintentionally widening the achieve-ment gap

      Yes! As well as accessibility, usability across systems, etc.

    1. This results of research portray a complex developmental landscape, with muchintertwining, which contrasts sharply with approaches to development that tend toisolate and highlight only individual developmental changes.

      This reminds me of a discussion in another class about complex dynamic systems.

    2. utility of focusing ongoal-directed activity as a means of understanding the intertwining of cultural, so-cial, and cognitive processes.

      Goal setting done by who? If done by the student, this is good insight on their values and the perception of their expertise.

    3. Studieshave shown that many students can do mathematics (i.e., they can apply formulasto get numerical answers) but may not understand the concepts behind the proce-dures they learn to apply. More than just knowledge of procedures and formulas,understanding also includes the concepts and mathematical relations that underliethose procedures

      Shallow knowledge “of”.

  2. Oct 2020
    1. More recentwork in translanguaging (Canagarajah,2011b; Garcıa & Li,2014) has emerged as an influentialinstantiation of this resource orientation, asserting that languages are not stored in the mind asdistinct and separate entities, but are part of a single communicative repertoire that individualsstrategically access to communicate. From a pedagogical perspective, this understanding suggeststhat educators should aim to tap into a student’s full linguistic repertoire when teaching(through) a new language. Rather than driving an artificial wedge between an individual’s mul-tiple and varied linguistic resources, translingual pedagogies encourage active, improvizational,and strategic mixing of linguistic codes in classroom spaces.

      I’m interested in how they used the word “mixing” here. As I was reading, I thought of scaffolding and prior knowledge. We will see...

    1. Finally, the resultsof this studysuggest we should beutilizing the same technology tools for professional development that teachers are ableto use in their classrooms. In a recent report on teacher professional development in the United States, the National Staff Development Council(Darling-Hammond, Wei, Andree, Richardson, & Orphanos, 2009) urged educators to provide professional development in more current andauthenticways:“Itistimeforoureducationworkforcetoengageinlearningthewayotherprofessionalsdodcontinually,collaboratively,andonthe jobdto address common problems and crucial challenges where they work”

      Annotating this for those of us with an interest in PD!

    2. That is, these 45 teachersreported actually dropping“inconsequential”curricula from their current practices to make room for more student-centered lessons. In theErtmer et al. study (2001), teachers with constructivist beliefs tended to utilize a“blended”pedagogical approach (using traditionalandconstructivist practices), which allowed them to reconcile differences between theirespousedstudent-centered beliefs and theirenactedteacher-centered practices.

      I am curious why this number is so low?

    3. n the early to mid-2000s, access to technology resources began to increase (National Center for Education Statistics, 2006) effectivelyreducing, and in some cases even eliminating, thisfirst-order barrier.

      I would argue that this substantial increase has some negative impacts as well. We have too many resources or tech tools at our disposal.

    1. al.,2008).Although a focus on universality might have value for creating broadlyapplicable designs, it also risks underplaying the profound role of culture inshaping people’s engagement with the world around them at a physical and sociallevel

      I’m glad that this is brought up in this article. With LS, we are wanting to explore and better our understanding of how people learn...which hopefully doesn’t lead to “step by step” or “algorithmic” instructional design or lesson in a box.

    2. We were especially interested in whether and howpractices of joint storybook reading would translate into computer program-ming activities.

      Transfer

    3. However, aprevalent assumption (often based more on intuition than evidence) is thatphysicality in its own right can lead to improved learning experiences (Marshall,2007).

      I find this statement very interesting! Teachers’ intuitions or personal philosophy is what any sort of instructional design choice boils down to.

    1. In spite of strong evidence from previous workand pilot studies that students are able to generate and explore solutions to com-plex problems, withholding cognitive support runs counter to the normal practiceof what teachers and students are used to. At least in the local context of ourwork, our experience has been that students are used to seeking assistance fromtheir teachers so much so that they do so even before sufficiently trying to solveproblems themselves. At the same time, teachers are just as used to providingassistance when it is asked for so much so that often opportunities for students togenerate and explore RSMs are missed—opportunities that, as we have argued,are critical for realizing PF.

      This could be more difficult in fast-paced courses (5-8 weeks). I oftentimes can not afford my students PF because I don’t have time for it.

    2. e. This suggests that, when given an opportunity,students do have richconstructive resources(di

      What are deemed constructive resources in 2020?

    3. delay that structure up until the student reaches animpasse—a form of failure—and is subsequently unable to generate an adequateway forward

      This reminds me of just in time teaching slightly...just more rapid and structured.

    1. Further, by identifying and understanding how learners naturally transition between unproductive and productive states when tinkering, we can begin to investigate new ways to scaffold learners who are unable to make this transition on their own.

      Adding more structure/formality to what was earlier described as “open-ended” and “tinkering-based”. I think there is a happy medium here where students can be provided the benefits to learning in an open environment, but yet be scaffolded through reflection and metacognitive prompts regarding the process.

    2. importance of making the work of others visible, even if participants do not share the same convergent

      Playing devil’s advocate - this leads me to the current culture of K-12 systems in formal education...look at your own paper, do your own work, don’t copy...there are a lot of “rules” in the current educational structure that go against this idea of collaborative yet divergent learning.

    3. n the short-term, the ability to recognize when learners are engaged in productive versus unproductive perseverance is a critical element in supporting their effective tinkering

      Is emotional intelligence going to be a more integral part of teacher preparation/professional development now? Since self-esteem and motivation are prevalent factors in “grit” and “processing”. What is considered productive for one student may not be productive for another.

  3. Sep 2020
    1. There-fore, the goal of design-based research is to lay open and problematize the com-pleted design and resultant implementation in a way that provides insight into thelocal dynamics. This involves not simply sharing the designed artifact, but provid-ing rich descriptions of context, guiding and emerging theory, design features ofthe intervention, and the impact of these features on participation and learning.

      I have not thought about DBL like this, in regards to what exactly it provides...

    1. design-related fields of education have made less progress in designing learning environ-ments that sustainably disrupt historically shaped inequities and cultivate transformative agencyfrom within communities.

      Just another instance of slow systemic change.

    1. we require research into new pedagogical models that includethe effective elements of inquiry and knowledge communities, but are not aschallenging for instructors

      interesting

    2. n order to respond to recent calls for the transformation of teaching and learn-ing in schools

      The need for change in our education systems has been a common theme...but where are these calls for transformation coming from? Who is declaring the need for change?

    1. show that these activities increase students’ understanding of the physicaland chemicalproperties of simple and complex compound

      How would one scaffold the use of these models (introduction and then gradual fading)? Would a student be allowed to use these models on an assessment?

    1. I'm about halfway through the article and I am noticing the use of a participatory versus acquisition based framework for learning. By viewing knowledge not just as something that is acquired, a silo to be filled and ceased filling once full, that knowledge is limited. The way that knowledge is described here as dynamic, growing, and changing. Knowledge is not accumulated, it is advanced.

    1. As stu-dents engage in dialogue and negotiation in a knowl-edge-building discourse (Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1994), themore knowledgeable peers contribute byraising important is-sues, pointing to resources, and by providing clarifications.Lessknowledgeablemembersplayanimportantrolebybring-ing up questions and asking for clarifications

      Using this as a prompt for online discussions to promote “deeper” discussion. What questions do you have or what do you need to know, and/or what expertise or knowledge can you provide for solving this issue, addressing this concern, etc.

    2. supportivescaffolding, reflectivescaffolding, and intrinsic scaffolding.

      Reading about these different types of scaffolding caused me to think of how the different types of scaffolding change during the PBL process and how they might reflect with different focuses of LE. Supportive scaffolding being student-centered and knowledge-centered, the scaffolding that occurs near the end where the instructor switches and provides more content specific feedback is knowledge-centered, etc etc.

    1. arguethatindividualsmustlearntoviewknowledgeas apersonalartifactthatcan beimprovedbyproduc-tivelyreflectingupontherelationsbetweenexistingtheoryand evi-dence.

      When? Which is the “best” grade for implementing this kind of change of how students think about learning?

      First thing I thought of was how some schools will blend two courses together (like science and math) and cover both curriculums as one course. When does this usually occur? And with PBL as the influence?

    1. the team saw that the value of technology lay not in what it could do on its own but in its integration with successful curriculum materials

      Don’t use technology for the sake of using technology. How is that technology going to enhance or facilitate learning? For who? How?

    1. Appropriately designed assessments can help teachers realize the needto rethink their teaching practices

      Assessment should not just measure the performance/learning of the student, but should also be a resource for teachers in improving their practice

    2. Stress on isolated parts can train students in a series ofroutines without educating them to understand an overall picture that willensure the development of integrated knowledge structures and informationabout conditions of applicability

      This makes me think of recent efforts in education and the blending of two content areas into one. For example, literature and history.

  4. Aug 2020
    1. Observation-Analysis Projects

      Due to teaching full time and being familiar with classroom learning environments, this is probably the option I will opt for. I’d like to analyze a learning environment outside of the typical brick and mortar classroom.