6 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Let’s try that, banging two rocks together, first with reading. Youdidn’t read and prepare for class today. Whether it was too many hoursat work or too many other things due in your other classes, somethingjust had to give, and you let the reading go for your writing class. Butyou have a few minutes before class to pull something together. Youhave the reading, you have some paper and a pen or a laptop, and youhave the course syllabus. Take five minutes, and make them count.Quickly answer these questions.

      Even minimal preparation can spark meaningful classroom engagement. I like that he turns an unprepared moment into a learning opportunity.

    2. Not much holding themtogether. So far this essay of philosophizing mixed with examplesmight make you think that I let my students write anything they wantand that I’m encouraging you, as well, to write anything you want; inother words, trading rules for freedom. I don’t think writers have tochoose one over the other. I don’t think you can. If I try to convinceyou to write whatever you want, I’m using a traditional strategy forengaging students: your choice, your interests, your whatever. But anywriting choice is a choice. At the end of a semester, Adbe Guerrero,a former student, taught me about the positions that expertise andchoice occupied in relation to his experiences, my teaching, and oneof our later readings

      Charlton argues for experimentation instead of over-focusing on rigid form. I like his honesty that "focus" can limit invention; reminds me to explore ideas before narrowing. In my personal projects, I also "drift" before finding structure, it's the same creative process. He claims too much focus harms learning, which is true but I believe some structure helps.

    3. The ease of familiarity and the intrinsic value of focus, in the end,may be two of the most damaging myths we need to re-invent in a writ-ing classroom.

      He ends by warning against over-valuing focus and routine. Challenging the "focus = good writing" myth makes sense, originally needs uncertainty. I like that he closes by inviting curiosity and collaboration, it turns writing into exploration. Feels similar to innovation in engineering, embracing trial and error as part of design.

    4. Brittany questioned the form and function of a test, so it made sensefor her to try and create one that met her goals. In the end, she cre-ated what we might now call an example of high school and collegealignment—an exam in high school that might have prepared her forour college writing class. It is wishful thinking, but classmates wereprompted to talk about how to approach tests that they needed to takebut didn’t agree with, and my colleagues and I learned that alignmentdiscussions can be had among all stakeholders, rather than amongteachers and administrators alone.

      Relates to the public communication, like adapting a game demo for investors. Could invention projects like this replace traditional essays? This reaffirms that audience awareness develops through experimentation, not memorization.

      (SAYS-DOES) Charlton says Brittany’s creative testing aligns audiences, and this does illustrate authentic transfer of learning.

    5. Q: If you can comprehend difficult material (i.e. Downs &Wardle Article), does that affect your writing capability?Merely a MisconceptionFrom the elementary level to secondary schooling, educa-tors are consistent upon the insistence that their students readmore because it will help improve their vocabulary, writing,etc. School districts have even gone as far as instituting incen-tive programs in order to encourage reading (i.e. AcceleratedReader or A.R.) or otherwise force it on students. However,the question here is, does reading more really help; and if so,does reading more difficult material play a role in one’s writ-ing level?. . . I believe that one’s writing can be improved throughreading and that in some part, your reading level does affectyour writing capability, but it is not always the case. Differ-ent people learn differently. Writing requires practice all onits own in order to better oneself at it and requires the read-ing of not just more difficult pieces but a multitude of pieces.In order to improve one’s writing one needs to be exposed todifferent varieties of writing in order to hone the ability ofcomprehension. Everyone has their own method and style ofwriting, however no one style of writing is original. It is justlike art, an artist can no longer claim their work to be originalbecause everything has been done before. What can be doneis to take what others have given us and use it to our advan-tage; learn from it.

      Brittany tests the link between reading and writing improvement, later critiques standardized testing. Her evolution from essay to exam design shows creative transfer. Her mock ACT logically aligns testing with actual writing tasks. What grading criteria did she use for her mock exam, was it ever tested?

    6. For this project, then,I want you to create a text in which you explain a theoryyou have about writing and learning.

      How can first-year students create theory if they feel inexperienced? Similar to how in robotics we hypothesize solutions before testing them.

      (SAYS-DOES) He says students should form personal theories; this does empower learners as researchers.