This is your gruelling daily routine. Now, ask yourself: what could philosophy do for you?
I wonder how the question and the imagined reality are related?
This is your gruelling daily routine. Now, ask yourself: what could philosophy do for you?
I wonder how the question and the imagined reality are related?
An Antidote to Injustice by Jennifer M Morton Picture yourself as a young mother with two children. You enrol in university to obtain a bachelor’s degree, hoping to give yourself a better chance at a job that pays a living wage. Maybe you receive government loans to pay for tuition, and rely on your family’s help, but you still don’t have enough to pay for living expenses and childcare. So, you continue working at a job that pays slightly above minimum wage while taking a full load of courses. Every day you wake up early to get the children ready for school and commute an hour or more to university. After class, you pick up your children from school. If you’re lucky, you can drop them off with a relative while you go to work. By the time you return home in the evening, you are tired, but still have many pages to read and assignments to complete. This is your gruelling daily routine. Now, ask yourself: what could philosophy do for you?
I think the strong use of pathos by the author was a good idea to grab readers attention and pull them in to an all to real depiction of a hard life that many mothers have to face. the author turns his first question into the "question of what could philosophy do for you" peaking my interest by making me wonder how the two things are related.
I thing group activities like this are the best way to engage a class and I look forward to participating in similar tasks this quarter. As it happens I have actually participated in this exact game previously for a political science class seeing the over lap of knowledge between the two subjects if very interesting.
working
I thing group activities like this are the best way to engage a class and I look forward to participating in similar tasks this quarter. As it happens I have actually participated in this exact game previously for a political science class seeing the over lap of knowledge between the two subjects if very interesting.
During the first round of this exercise, students inevitably take so many fish that there are none left in the lake. Students then discuss what has happened and what they ought to do differently in the next round. Some students have strong intuitions that everybody should take an equal amount, while others insist that all that matters is that in the end there are enough fish left to repopulate the lake. Not only is this exercise pedagogically engaging, but it leads students to develop proposals and to evaluate them critically. When successful, students use what they learned in this exercise to begin developing a sense of what they think would be a fair way of distributing resources and to critique the political and social institutions under which they live.
I wonder what comparisons the students playing this game could draw to real life after having analyzed the outcome of this imaginary predicament?
I divide students into groups and ask them to imagine that each group is a family subsisting by fishing from a lake. If a group catches two fish, most of their family will survive, although some among the weak, elderly, or very young in the family could die. If the group catches three fish, all of their family will survive. If they catch any more fish, the excess will rot. However, two fish have to be left in the lake in order for the fish population to be replenished the following year. If the groups over-fish, famine ensues and all of the families will die. There are only enough ‘fish’ (paper fish) in the ‘lake’ (a bag I pass around) to allow for most families to take just two fish, if there are to be two fish left in the lake in the end. During the first round of this exercise, students inevitably take so many fish that there are none left in the lake.
I thing group activities like this are the best way to engage a class and I look forward to participating in similar tasks this quarter. As it happens I have actually participated in this exact game previously for a political science class seeing the over lap of knowledge between the two subjects if very interesting.
philosophy teaches you to think and write logically and clearly. This, we tell our students, will be of use to them no matter what path they pursue. We advertise philosophy, then, as a broadly useful means to a variety of ends. There is a lot of truth to this dispassionate answer, but it is also rather disappointing.
I quite like the pragmatic answer the author give to the question why the study of philosophy resonates with you as an individual. I like the pragmatic answer despite the author claiming it is dispassionate I believe it beautifully describes the field and its practical use with out trying to overcomplicate and upsell what philosophy really is