23 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2024
    1. Black girls were still the fodder of porn sites, dehumanizing them ascommodities, as products and as objects of sexual gratification.

      Black girls are still being depicted on pornographic websites, dehumanized and treated as mere products and objects of sexual desire. This is so inhuman and not appropriate to treat people as such based on their skin tone.

    1. #TransformDH was our attempt to turn the digital humanities toward these radical traditions, as well as toward the bodies of critical work in new media studies by Wendy Chun, Lisa Nakamura, Anna Everett, Tara McPherson, and many others, that unpack the politics inherent in the force of the digital, the powers that shape the hardware and software that in turn shape our scholarly work.

      The goal with #transformDH was to steer digital humanities towards radical traditions, as well as to engage with critical scholarship in new media studies by scholars like Wendy Chun, Lisa Nakamura, Anna Everett, Tara Mcpherson, and others. These works examine the political dimensions of digital forces and how hardware and software shape our academic pursuits.

    1. I find this to be the best locus to explore the division that Drucker andMcGann pointed to, because these digital objects [whose existence is anchored inmateriality] and the immateriality of the rational logos that sits behind the traditional,abstract and modern, humanities discourse are essentially in opposition.

      I believe this is the prime focal point for investigating the division emphasized by Drucker and McGann because the Digital entities, grounded in materially, stand in contrast to the intangible rational concepts that underpin traditional humanities discourse. This dichotomy highlights the inherent opposition between tangible digital objects and the abstract principles of traditional humanistic study.

    1. We argue that critical digital humanities starts with thesepremises in order to avoid the dangers of treating thecomputer as a ‘truth machine’ or allowing the technicalissues of the research infrastructures and projects drivethe kinds of questions that digital humanities is allowed toask

      The statement underscores the significance of critical digital humanities in not viewing computers as unquestionable sources of truth and in not letting technical challenges determine the direction inquiry. It stresses the need for maintaining a critical outlook on technology and infrastructure to uphold broader intellectual and ethical considerations within digital humanities research.

    2. The aim of outlining a critical digital humanities here is notto offer a prescription for a final approach, rather it is tobegin to enumerate the plurality of approaches within sucha field, and more specifically a constellation of conceptsrelated to a notion of ‘digital humanities’ and thesoftwarization of the humanities more generally.

      The purpose of of introducing a critical digital humanities approach here isn't to prescribe a fixed method. Instead, it's to kickstart a conversation about the multitude of approaches within this field. More specifically, it aims to delve into different concepts associated with 'digital humanities' and the broader trend of software integration in humanities scholarship.

  2. Jan 2024
    1. Relational databases (most common type of database) store and provide access not only data but also metadata in a structure called data dictionary or system catalog. It holds information about: tables, columns, data types, constraints table relationships, and many more

      Relational databases, the most prevalent type, efficiently manage and offer access to both data and metadata through a structured data dictionary or system catalog. This repository holds crucial information, including tables, columns, data types, constraints, table relationships, and more, ensuring the comprehensive organization and accessibility of database elements.

    2. Each book has a number of standard metadata on the covers and inside. This includes: a title, author name, publisher and copyright details, description on a back, table of contents, index, page numbers.

      These standard metadata elements, encompassing title, author, publisher details, copyright information, back cover description, table of contents, index, and page numbers, offer comprehensive insights into each book's content and context.

    3. Those are some typical metadata elements: Title and description, Tags and categories, Who created and when, Who last modified and when, Who can access or update.

      These metadata elements provide essential information, ensuring effective organization, accessibility, and attribution within a digital collection.

    1. Text Analysis

      text analysis as a method that involves examining and interpreting written material

    2. s discussed in Chapters 3 and 4, humanists now generally employ arange of materials broader than the texts and documents of their prede-cessors, including objects, artifacts, space, performance and construct.

      This encompasses objects, artifacts, space, performances, and constructs. This broader approach reflects a more inclusive and interdisciplinary perspective in the study of humanities.

    3. Someolder tools are still in use even though they are no longer supported bythe institutions and organizations - either commercial or not-for-profit-that developed them

      older tools continue to be utilized despite lacking support from the institutions or organizations that originally developed them, be it commercial or not-for-profit. It highlights the resilience of these tools and the willingness of users to maintain their use, even in the absence of official backing.

    4. humanist scholars have also convened inclassrooms, symposia, lectures, seminars and conferences for centuries

      it emphasizes the centuries-old tradition of humanist scholars gathering in classrooms, symposia, lectures, seminars, and conferences. These forums have long been crucial for intellectual exchange and collaborative learning among scholars.

    1. Whether it’s going into the archives or trying to piece together the history of a neighborhood and creating some sort of electronic repository around these primary sources, or is it something more mundane but still important, like transcribing the fragments of a long lost newspaper

      now, with computers, we can save all the cool old stuff we find, like old newspapers, and put them in a special electronic library. Even the small things, like writing down pieces of a super old newspaper, are important because they help us know about the past!

    2. The public is an obvious one, right? I mean, like one place that the Digital Humanities and Digital History seems to me like it’s been a success over the last quarter century is sharing research. I guess when this kind of enterprise started, people talked about democratizing free… And in some ways that has happened.

      The success of Digital Humanities and Digital History in sharing research over the last quarter-century has notably democratized access to information. Embracing digital platforms has made scholarly work more widely available, contributing to a more inclusive and collaborative academic landscape.

    1. The semipublic peer-to-peer review was modeled on a number of recent exper-iments in peer review, most notably Noah Wardrip-Fruin’s Expressive Processing(2008), Kathleen Fitzpatrick’s Planned Obsolescence (2009), Shakespeare Quar-terly’s “Shakespeare and New Media” issue (2010), and Trebor Scholz’s Learningthrough Digital Media (2011)

      The adoption of a semipublic peer-to-peer review model, influenced by works like Noah Wardrip-Fruin’s "Expressive Processing," Kathleen Fitzpatrick’s "Planned Obsolescence," the "Shakespeare and New Media" issue in Shakespeare Quarterly, and Trebor Scholz’s "Learning through Digital Media," reflects a dynamic shift in scholarly discourse.

    2. In the aftermath ofthe 2011 Modern Language Association Convention, many members of the fieldengaged in a public debate about what it means to be a “digital humanist.” Thedebate was sparked by University of Nebraska scholar Stephan Ramsay, whose talkat the convention was bluntly titled “Who’s In and Who’s Out.”

      the conversation around digital humanities continued to evolve, encompassing topics like the integration of technology in teaching and research, the development of digital archives, and the impact of digital tools on traditional scholarly practices. The aftermath of the 2011 MLA Convention marked a critical juncture in the ongoing exploration of the intersection between technology and the humanities, shaping the trajectory of digital humanities as a vibrant and dynamic field of study.

    1. Hypertext in particular attracted a good many theorists

      Exploring its possibilities and implications became a focus of intellectual discussion.

    2. COCOA is also economical of file space, but is perhaps less readable for thehuman.

      It was a tough time for technology.

    3. At this time much attention was paid to the limitations of the technology. Data to be analyzed wereeither texts or numbers. They were input laboriously by hand either on punched cards, with eachcard holding up to eighty characters or one line of text (uppercase letters only), or on paper tape,where lower-case letters were perhaps possible but which could not be read in any way at all by ahuman being.

      Back then, technology had its challenges – manual input on punched cards or paper tape limited both character types and human readability, highlighting the constraints of early data processing methods.

    4. in 1998 he reflected on the potential of the World Wide Web

      that was cool

    5. humanities computing

      Humanities computing uses computers to study history, literature, and culture. It helps us understand the past and preserve important stories using technology.

    1. “humanities computing

      Humanities computing" refers to the application of computational methods and technologies to the field of humanities, enabling the analysis, interpretation, and exploration of various aspects of human culture and knowledge. It involves the use of computing tools and techniques to enhance research, document analysis, text processing, and other scholarly activities within the humanities disciplines.

    2. What Is Digital Humanities?

      technologies to enhance the study, analysis, and interpretation of humanities disciplines