26 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2023
    1. “I think gacha games have less monetization... or like, top-down stuff. Because it’s separated from the gameplay. You’re making a good game, and then gacha is the monetization. Whereas for a [free-to-play strategy] game like Clash of Clans, monetization is the core thing, and you pay for time.” However, he acknowledged that the game still involved gambling. “I think it deserves to be criticized. Or at least looked at critically.”

      I agree the game's core gameplay is amazing and to be able to run in a portable device is a technological marvel, but that doesn't mean gambling is good as you should not go for a roll when you don't have enough money

    2. t costs around $444 to guarantee a particular character through the game’s pity system, which increasingly stacks the percentages in your favor as you pull. If you’re going for a specific featured weapon, the figure is $592.

      DUDE! JESUS THAT LIKE 937 DOLLARS WHAT!!

    3. “If my family and non-gamer friends ever knew, they would absolutely lose their minds,” said one government employee who spent over a thousand dollars on the game.

      Yeah they would ngl i play the game and haven't spend any money on the game and still got good rewards. I imagine people getting bored when they have overpowered characters

    4. “It’s like that Ariana Grande song: I see it, I like it, I want it, I got it,” said one anonymous investment banker who’s spent over $10,000 i

      my mom would kill me if i spend that amount of money god damn!

    1. an unfair advantage

      i agree cause well my last annotation kinda say that :D -both cause unfair advantages -both make people spend -but one can make atleast a slight advantage the other well not exactly ngl

    2. if you play Clash Royale and you paid to upgrade all your cards to level 13, you'll have a clear advantage against an opponent with level 11 cards. However, the free-to-play player can and will eventually have the same level 13 cards, but they'll have to make a bigger effort than you.

      Thats not the case sometimes as the cards are more leveled meaning more possibilities to ruin ones fun in a game, but at least there is a chance to win ig

    3. Pay-to-fast, also known as Pay 2 fast or P2F, is a term used for video games that let you progress in the game quicker if you spend real-life money on them.

      I still put them in pay to win because you are ahead than a player that hasn't payed and will still have advantage

    1. these heavily loot-focused games have always had a slot-machine quality, which Diablo Immortal’s business model makes literal.

      Thats what most games do in these days

    2. to upgrade the gems you have, and eventually to slot in each gem’s additional resonance slots. It’s endless.

      Most of this you gotta pay since i tried the game myself to see and its dependent on paying

    3. You wouldn’t know it when you start playing the game. At first, Diablo Immortal is as fun to play as it sounds: a lightweight, portable, social, and quick-fire version of Diablo 3.

      Many mobile games start off like that by giving you free resources and coins that can only be used in a shop. Examples can be Clash Of Clan when they give you a high amounts of gems

  2. Sep 2023
    1. using AI as a tool to enhance human creativity, rather than as a replacement for it. Education and public awareness campaigns can help people understand the value of traditional art and the importance of supporting artists.

      This is the best way to help both artist and ai

    2. e potential to disrupt the traditional art market. As AI-generated art becomes more prevalent, it could lead to a decrease in demand for traditional art, causing artists to lose income.

      this says how important it is to manage it as more of a tool to avoid thing like this

    3. ome artists believe that AI-generated art lacks the emotional depth and authenticity that comes with human creativity

      of course since ai made it and it feels like theres no meaning behind it. You cant just tape a banana on a wall and say "yup this is art" and i swear if theres a reason why its like that omg i will die

    1. artists understandably nervous about their own futures — why would anyone pay for art, they wonder,

      as an artist myself, i thought that the digital art was gonna be a head start for the future and just leave sketching on a book alone ,but when the ai art thing started it made me worry for my job and i can see that here too

    2. “I’m not going to apologize for it,” he said. “I won, and I didn’t break any rules.”

      I hate this as many artist in that competition worked with passion to create pieces of art while you can just write a sentence and bam! art created done thats it. I feel like yes giving the power for people to create art is amazing, but the satisfying feeling of perfecting your craft is better than letting someone else do it for you

    3. In your opinion, how do A.I.-generated pictures like these compare to an original piece of artwork

      they look to uncanny for me as if you put an complicated sentence the worse it gets, while if you just put "woman" or "man" it will be easier

    1. “We should learn to appreciate the beauty and the creativity of AI. Because if we leverage AI, if we work with AI, maybe we can better develop our own creativity. Maybe we can collaborate with AI, and achieve something we cannot achieve alone,” he says. “But if we are unaware of our bias against AI, that is not possible.”

      we could but in the present moment ai is taking the talents of artist we need a ai tool that works with the creativity of the artist

    2. It’s not like some people prefer Coke and some prefer Pepsi. It represents a deeper philosophical question about our understanding of human identity,”

      what? this i dont get that much since its not comparable to ai art