Let me back up a sec. I think that AnPan and I are in agreement inasmuch as we are both skeptical of absolutist claims to the Truth of moral values.
So are we to believe you agree to disagree? Who is to say who is right or wrong on their view
3 Matching Annotations
- Jan 2019
-
www.readmorewritemorethinkmorebemore.com www.readmorewritemorethinkmorebemore.com
-
-
www.readmorewritemorethinkmorebemore.com www.readmorewritemorethinkmorebemore.com
-
t's like trying to teach the game of baseball to students by watching a bunch of baseball games.
I can appreciate the analogy from this quote
-
-
www.blogger.com www.blogger.com
-
I have to say i disagree. In almost this entire blog you heavily state how a non relativist basically has no grounds to stand when trying to back up a thought or opinion on a value or claim. But then you make a statement on how a non relativist will always have a stronger case when it comes to lazy relativist. So this sounds very contracting to the whole point your trying to make. You can't give a non credit to some degree then simply not acknowledge it when it comes to a relativist.
-