I think community involvement in data design is important becausethe person who design this may ignore the users’ true needs. Including affected people in the design process can help reduce these problems because they can share their real experiences and point out risks that developers might overlook. For example, different users may have different concerns about privacy, bias, and how social media platforms spread information. By listening to these people and involving them in testing, developers can create more fair and responsible systems. How can developers make sure that the voices of marginalized groups are actually considered when designing new technologies?

In my opinion, these important social media platforms may recommend popular posts rather than more reliable content. The number of likes does not fully reflect the accuracy or value of the content. I think that the social media platforms should not only consider the number of likes but also whether the content is genuine and has reliable sources.

I found it interesting that the article shows how difficult it is to make a bot behave ethically. I think the developers should be responsible for what their bot does, even when the bot learns from other users, because they are the ones who decided to create and release it.

In my opinion, if the bot act just like human, for example, they may post human selfie and share daily. This will make communication on social media less credible. It feels like it’s getting harder to know what’s authentic online. I mean, should social media platforms be required to clearly identity accounts that are operated by bots?

I think the Sacco case raises an interesting question about the boundaries of public rights. They have the right to critique her remarks. However, i think this does not necessarily mean that thay have the right to further pry into her private life. Does the public information disclosed on social media imply that the public can freely search for person's private informations?

Another Ethics framework that could be included is Ethics egoism. Whether an action is moral mainly depends on whether it is in line with the interests of the actor. This framwork could be interesting for social media because the company may want more profit and more users online, they may release more atractive video or news, in order to make their user addicted to their apps. So that they can make more profit during this process. If the company can bring greater benefits, then the company might consider this choose as morally justified. But i wonder whether should a compamy's own benefit be enough to make a decision ethical if their users are harmed.