It is like the relationship between the proofs of the argument, only when we have our memory in our brains, we can have our unique ability of critical thinking.

Human-beings tend to be arrogant, we should not to think we are so smart like the smart devices. It is great enough to know how to use and control the smart devices. The point is not to compete to a technology device. That's not a wise strategy.

Indeed, we can easily find the correct information in the first time. However, the web is just a tool, we use it to know the answers. We won't get smart because we get some new tools, right?

The great impactions come form the huge usefulness. So, sometimes the most useful thing may bring us a larger harm.

They do can present us the attractive and entertainment technology experience. Even children don't know any knowledge can be attracted by them easily.

I hate that when I talking to someone, but he is checking his phone. The feeling is terrible and I will play my phone as well so it will kill the talk.

According to this study, I found the main cause of the low scores students get is the distraction by the phones. Abandon using phones during school is obviously a bright way to raise students' scores.

The most fundamental and effective way to avoiding the influence of phones is putting them out of sight.

It's normally that people want to quit the things they are doing but check their phones. So this will let us speed the working process, which will probably lower the quality of works.

Indeed, when we working with the phone on side, we will save some attention to the phone. Iy will decrease our focus time on the working.

When we work or play without the phones, we can get more concentrate on the thing we do. In this way, we can feel more fun doing things.

We should not solely pursue the great convenience the smart phone brings us, but focus our intelligence development by think something ourselves.

I don't think anybody will know it till read this article. I will tell my friends this crazy thing!

It is really amazing that our phones can influence our brainpower even without be playing by us. I will put away my phone when I don't need to use it at home from now on.

In my opinion, the groups who were close to the smart phones would loss the contest.

This task can show the creativity and innovation of test takers .

This is like a test of careful ability. People who can concentrate on thinking will perform better. In another word, the test measures the ability of people not to rely on mobile phones to live.

I think the smartphones are more important than other sources of distraction. As the author mentions before, phones are being with people in every moment. So we tend to treat our smartphones more serious when they catch our attentions every time.

I have the same feeling, that's why our phones must be turn to silent mode when we have classes.

It matches my previous thoughts, various alters do can distract us from things we currently do.

We began to rely on the devices when we don't know the answers, but not to think ourselves. The " use it or lose it" theory also proven this.

Before reading the following content, I guess the influence mainly is about our distractions after using the electronic devices.

It had been a dream for me when I was a child, to have a smart mini computer with me all the time. Now the smart phones really be loved by us because it's well- functional feature.

A good way to get rid of different kinds of notifications is to forbidden them which unnecessary to be known for us, like the phone games and video apps. We will feel more independent when we turn off some meaningless alerts on phones.

Sometimes when we forget to bring our phones when we waiting in line or doing something alone, we will feel helpless and terrible because we can have a sense of embarrassing, for have nothing to kill the time.

There's a saying is the phone has become the third hand of human begins, which shows the importance of the phone now. It is hard to see the people come out without their phone anymore,

According to my data center on my phone, the average daily based time I use my phone is between 2 hours and 4 hours.

I think in this case, the author already has a patent for Twitter content.

Only once and for all manuscripts have been polished and modified to get the final published manuscript.

Sometimes secrets can be the positive or some privacy secretes. It is not true when we get used to treat secrets in an bad way.

I think so, cause Twitter can be seen by many people who keep focus on the writer's works. It is boring to open to public in advance.

I don't think the author should think about his thoughts before the article is published. This is a professional norm. I think that if an author publishes his own scattered thoughts, it is not comparable to the final unified systemic article.

A famous writer and he had an unfinished novel. [(https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:%E9%A6%96%E9%A1%B5)

When you say it, you lose the mystery that the work should have, just like the early spoiler of the movie. This is a very unwise act.

I agree with this. Sometimes when we talk on the phone, we will write our own ideas on paper to better present our views. In addition, when we sometimes talk to our friends about our own problems, we finally come up with a solution to the problem.

In such an era of high-transparency, many people have unselfishly shared the philosophies they have personally experienced with those young people who have just entered the society. However, young people can't understand the true meaning unless they have experienced the tempering of life.

The author may feel exasperated because he did not understand the details of Salinger's life. But this is exactly where Salinger's wisdom lies, leaving behind the infinite imagination of future generations.

Could it be that if the author posts something on Twitter, would he change his work to rely on Twitter's comments? I don't think so. The right to grasp and modify the work should always be in the hands of the author.

Indeed, writing is always anxious. But I think that writing Twitter can greatly alleviate or even eliminate this anxiety in writing. Because this is different from a private personal diary, when you post to the public, you are active. Therefore, the anxiety of writing in this positive state of mind will naturally decrease.

It turns out that the secret process of creation can produce a more private work, allowing readers to have a direct dialogue with the author. This is really amazing, it is a great result of the author's intentional writing.

A very good statement, some people send some social status not to show others, but to remind themselves. Or in the future they can look at what they are like now.

I am curious: What does "There is no there there" mean? So I checked this phrase, it refers to that the person/thing/item is not that important, or nothing special.

This description is very lively and interesting, and it shows that many of the author's literary creations come from the feelings of real life. The authors speculate that if Alain de Botton had Twitter, he would reveal the source of various life experiences in the work, such as a wife who makes him helpless.

This description is very lively and interesting, and it shows that many of the author's literary creations come from the feelings of real life. The authors speculate that if Alain de Botton had Twitter, he would reveal the source of various life experiences in the work, such as a wife who makes him helpless.

Henry James is a famous American novelist and literary critic. His masterpieces include novels: "An American", "Portrait of a Lady", "Dove Wings", "Envoys" and "Golden Bowl".

I learned a new saying "go down the rabbit hole". I checked the meaning of this short sentence, which means that things will enter an unknown process. Such an interesting rhetoric expresses the possibility that the trend of things is like entering the wonderful rabbit hole of "Alice in Wonderland".

If the author continues to post his new ideas on social media, it really has a two-side impact. On the one hand, we can learn about the writer's new inspiration and get inspired at the first time. On the other hand, this may reduce the attractiveness of the author's new work to the reader because of the lack of some mystery.

Twitter is more like a new communication channel. Almost everyone has a Twitter account, and almost everyone has used Twitter.

The mechanical metal texture is indeed very attractive, just like the mechanical keyboard that is now popular. When I hear the sound of tapping metal when I type, I will become more creative.

All inventions are radical at first, and change always brings different opinions. The benefits of the invention will always show up as new users increase, and then replace existing products.

I have never seen a typewriter. It is similar to a thick keyboard.Typewriters have greatly improved the efficiency of the dissemination of literary works. At the same time, the typewriter was a good assistant for human communication. The typewriters I have in mind often appear in the spy films of the last century.

Here is an image for the IBM Typewriter heads.

Here is a YouTube video for IBM typeball working in slow motion. https://youtu.be/RTtKaqIpOJc

When we read the paper book, in addition to reading the text, we also gained other feelings about the book. This diverse feeling is that e-books cannot be replaced.

The author sees reading as a serious matter, unlike relaxed Twitter and video games. In fact, doing other things is the same, and I can pay attention to things in order to do things well.

Modern mobile books have become very user-friendly, with navigation, chapters and page numbers.

This is a very famous truth, and the people who win the hearts of the people will get the authority. In the war years, all orders will be reshuffled.

It is more convincing and immersive for writers to write their own experiences into novels. Tolstoy, who witnessed the war, successfully painted a magnificent scene of war in the book.

The charm of printing is the thick feeling of holding the palm of the hand, the physical feeling of touching the text, and the smell of the ink.

Life is short, we have to read more good books in a short life. But the criteria for judging good books are not only immersive. Just like war and peace, it is boring in front. Only after 15% of the previous one can understand the deep meaning of the author.

The inability to concentrate is probably a human nature. Primitive humans must maintain a high degree of vigilance and attention to changes in the environment in order to notice the beasts. Therefore, they must have a very sensitive sensitivity, and they must also prevent enemy attacks when doing current work. Over time, this has become a major feature of humanity.

The author actively controls himself/herself from the influence of mobile phone messages and concentrates on reading.

When people concentrate on reading and are attracted by books, time becomes very fast. We just want to swim in the book.

The new note-taking function of voice dictation is not possible with ordinary paper books. This is indeed a big advantage of e-books.

I often can't help but check the news of social software and let myself get out of the current thing. In fact, this will cause habitual inattention and inability to do the thing you are doing. I should try to fix this problem in the future.

The author not only took notes, but also printed them into a book to revisit the experience of reading. This is a good habit. I will use this method to organize my notes in the next reading.

The author vividly depicts the convenience of people reading in the Internet age.

Indeed, traditional bookstores need to be maintained by good people like the author.

Turning off reminders is a thorough approach. We can't believe in our own consciousness. The external environment has a powerful influence on us.

I agree with the author's point of view. It is not distracting to check the information on the Internet. Instead, it is an expression of immersive reading and seeking background information.

The reason why many people don't like to read large novels is that they can't remember a large number of character names. In addition, the Russian city name in the book will also cause headaches for many readers who don't understand Russia.

Here the author is very humorous and imagines that his life will have a Kindle progression. I think the author's reading habits are very good, gradually filling his/her own blanks, and the author begins to read large novels. Sometimes changes can bring unexpectedly good results.

I also often pay attention to the percentage progress bar below the e-book, I think the shortcomings of this feature outweigh the advantages. If we care too much about the progress of reading, we will speed up reading and reduce our understanding. This is not conducive to understanding the subject and content of the book.

A positive attitude is often the beginning of success, and I appreciate the author's optimism. Sometimes, self-affirmation and positive psychological hints will promote our efficiency.

The author vividly wrote the mentality of not reading the book, which truly reflects that we tend to evade reality if we do not achieve the results we want. Hiding unfinished books will comfort us.

It is indeed inconvenient to carry a heavy work on the subway. I have a similar experience. If the subway is crowded, I can't open the page at the peak of the traffic.

I think "Pulled out" can show the portability of a mobile phone. Just like cuneiform tablets, we convey more information through small objects.

Poetry can reflect both social phenomena and poetry's feelings and thoughts. Through a short length of poetry, you can read long-form understanding and association. Many poems in ancient China have been passed down to the present day, because the poet's thoughts and social experiences are worthy of our analysis and taste.

It is impossible to deny a possibility that children who grow up in the era of the gradual demise of paper books may prefer reading on the screen. People who have not been exposed to paper books are more likely to adapt to e-books.

Indeed, compared to traditional paper books, reading e-books on mobile phones is more distracting, and there are too many tempting things on the phone to distract us.

As scholars have said, reading without flipping pages makes people very confused like in the sea. I also think that reading e-books can't be immersed, and reading e-books for a long time will make my eyes cry.

This sentence echoes the beginning, and it shows the results of expert research. We are not easy to concentrate on reading e-books. Later, the author mentioned that reading in front of the screen is impossible to read into the soul. The side reflects that the author is a person who loves reading very much, and has a deep understanding of "soul reading."

This opening sentence shows the author's determination to experience e-book reading, although many experts and scholars do not recommend it. This attitude reminds me of a truth that seeks truth through practice. Only when I have experienced it, I have more experience.