In this book, Abbate shows how women had to “recode” their roles in early computing. In this way they can against a rigged system. This book also reminds me a movie called Hidden Figures, which also shows how women earned respect through their exceptional professional abilities.

I really want people to stop publish negative message without any reason. As I get familiar with phschology, I notice there are so many factors will impact someone's mental health, even a single word. When I see so many people are suffered because of potential damage, I feel truly sad about this.

This article mainly talks about Face book's international initiative plan tried to get more people online. They launched Free Basics to let users access Facebook and basic information apps without paying. However, critics argued this setup broke net neutrality, because Facebook was promoting its own apps.

Once government regulate the target, social media's operation logic will change a lot due to lose of this high return rate method. There are some potential business model: Firstly, subscription is a common and stable way to receive money, and it doesn't need any data therefore protect privacy. However, there is challenges on subscription content. If user think the content is unworthy, social media will lose users. Other options can be Tipping and Paywall. For example, people can pay for useful course online or streamer they like.

This article mainly talks about Twitter's unique system create a performance intimacy (showing people vulnerability and personality to create connection). Although this conncection can create resonance, it also brings shallow relationships or misunderstanding.

A user will right click the message, click the "retraction" button, and click ok to confirm retraction. There are multiple options: User can keep the original content with a "retraction" sign to help discussion. Other than that, user can choose to delete the whole content with a "user retract" sign. This can help user to fix wrong message.

This article mainly talks about "Cyber-raiding" tactics (such as organizing a group of people to harass a live stream or social media account) are now being used more often on new platforms like Discord and Twitch. Some Discord private groups are now organizing campaigns to harass other people. These groups use computer programs and bots to collect information about their targets. The platform has introduced some tools to deal with these problems, such as blocking and temporarily restricting the speech of new users. However, the harassers also use VPNs and "trumpets" to bypass these tools.

I think online harassment is sometimes justifiable when it targets people who endanger society. Take a fugitive murderer, if the public pressure and shaming are aimed at bring that person to justice, and the pressure stops once the goal is met, then the harassment functions as a justice. However, harassment that's carried out for entertainment, or by people who slip into a righteous crowd and pretend their motives are positive are not acceptable.

This article mainly talks about that, techonology shouldn't be limited to replicate face to face communication. There is more space other than copy and paste. People can focus on utilize technology advantages to improve online communication and make it different from face to face.

Yes, there are multiple ways. I have answered some question on Chinese platform Zhihu, it is a crowdsourcing like answering question platform. People will post question and invite others in different industries to share their thoughts. In order to encourage good answers in this platform, Zhihu will put a "expert" or "significant" mark on the good answer.

This article mainy talks about Facebooks' algorithm tend to promote content that will trigger people harder reaction. It cause misleading content spread easier on Facebook. Although people in Facebook tried soft interventions but they are all delaied by their growing goals. Somehow commercial benefit cover ethcial responsibility in this company.

Yes I always do this in League of Legend, and I always get report feedback. Recently Riot are getting serious to any comment that is rude. I have been banned talking and typing in game, because I borrow my account to other people. They are less good at English and communicate more aggresively

Doomsurfing is a concept in this article. During uncertain time, some people will keep looking news for answers. Even though most of news are negative, and it makes people feel dpressed, people still scrolling and can't turn that off.

I think social media will create anxiety in most time. People are actually won't be perfect as they sharing to others, because everyone is human but not a god. However there are lots of content will make people feel "I'm am behind" and "I'm not good enough". This is really bad situation for people have less self value concious.

This article mainly talks aout attention become rare resources, some platform and social media earn money through catching people's attention. Trump win attention by using emotional action and words in such way. Also, comtemporary contents are more like "clickbait" to attract people. Some algorithms make content more aggrasive.

Today I think people only cite source for those who unfamiliar with certain meme. In most cases, memes lose their fun if someone don't know this before people use it. For example, I say tung tung tung sahura, and my friends don't get it, so I have to explain it to them, no one feel funny in this process.

This article mainly talks about how twitter start to think how to hlep better conersation online. Jack Dorsey admits that twitter encouraged toxic things like dunking through its original design. To fix it, they start to define and measure conversation health.

Social media should prevent the spread of harmful message and misinforamtion, help diversity and stability of new information. Besides, they should also monitor users mental health to prevent potential mental illness happening, and users need to aknowledge that they will see certain message.

It reminds me some confused designs on iphone, are they really adapting or subdue user? Like putting nothing new or very useless function on new iphone, but still promote new version every year. I feel people notice this recent years and sales of iphone goes down a little bit.

This article is an introduction to ME/CFS. It is a longterm illness with extreme tired feeling. It is not relieved by rest and physical or mental activity will make it worse. Besides, it has symptoms like sleep disturbance, brain fog and post exertional malaise. Tha case of this illness is unknown, but there are many potential factors. It happens more in middle aged women and hard to identify

This article talks about serious violation on privacy on Facebook. Some employees use internal tools to access, track and monitor female users without authorization. It reveals serious problem within internal data control and employees supervise in Facebook. And author mentions that such incidents are not isolated, there is broader concerns.

I think the most serious problem is people are losing control on their privacy. Today we are giving lots of information without choice, like location, interest preferences (Amazom), Browsing history, and contact list. Also, many websites put "Accept all cookie" as an mandatory option.

The article talks about how an individual's sexual orientation can be known through social media connections. It still can happen without their own disclosure, which raise serious concerns about privacy.

It is mostly inaccurate, because I'm an international student, who has ramdom demand on online shopping. Sometime I choose jewelry for friends birthday gift, and sometime I buy internet stuff to make my pc game smoother. I feel comfortable with Google knowing this. I’m generally not interested in most of the advertisements I see while studying abroad. I usually shop based on my own needs, so I find most ads quite meaningless to me.

Jaboukie Young-White changed his Twitter name and picture as a official FBI account. He sent a controversies comment on Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Some people think the comment are historical injustice and racism, and it could be inappropriate and offensive. People also have different views on whether it is funny or offensive.

I have seen lots of trolling on myself or others. The main reasons are difference in oponion or some discrimination. For discrimination I just ignore them because most of communications are lack of logic. For oponions difference, I usually try to communicate with polite and patience and try my best to understand both sides. If people are keep trolling then I will quit the conversation.

This article mainly talks about Trump are probably using Android to post but his team are using iPhone. The words he uses are more emotional, but post on iphone are more official, like some link or activity. Also, the time of posts are different between Android and iPhone.

It happens when I notice how people are thinking differently, especially I'm talking with so many people.(the larger the sample size, the higher the possibility of encountering different people.). I don't feel compromise my authenticity, it is wise to save my energy on things that benefit me but not express myself to who don't understand me.

conspiracy theories is not a modern theory. It emerge in the 19th century. For example, political parties in the United States used conspiracy theories to attack their opponents, such as the Democrats accusing elites manipulate economy and the Whigs worrying about Catholic immigrants against them.

It reminds me Bilibili in China. It was a very friendly platform for people who like anime. However, with more traffic and people come to it, it become a very complex and chaotic platform filled with unhealthy memes and problematic content.

This article mainly talks about Elon Musk try to stop the acquisition of Twitter. He pointed out that fake account in twitter is too large to be consider reliable platform. Also, Legal experts said Musk may have to pay at least $1billion in break-up fees and have risk of the deal enforced by the courts.

There are many posts in Red Note have a very attractive but selective quoting title, like "if you cannot stay alone then you have no ability of loving yourself". When I first see this, the most strong feeling is self doubt and anxious, which makes me want to see what content will include in this post. This is harmful to people's mental health if they can not think critically.

This citation mainly talk about app store can be manipulated. A women sit in front of lots of iphone and download then delete apps to increase download numbers. Moreover, app owner can use such way to increase their apps rank. Thus, the rank might be confused for user to get real information

I dislike autochat bot.I only use social media when I seek help, want to sublease, or have questions. Meanwhile, I will charge money to platform to promote my post to more people, thus my problems can be solve quickly. However, those bots will occupy lots of real person and waste my money on promotion :(. It's kind hard to distinguish real person or bot if they just like/collect the post.

I have read a method that related to ethic, which is what a person does must be good for him or her, and good in this condition means good for that person, not good in the broader sense. Also, no one will do something that is meaningless to him or her. Is this view justified?

I read another ethic frameworks is called Adlerianism. It mainly discuss that a health people should have interest to help others, and people's actions are related to their goal, and people will grow with their inferiority complex. But it is not a traditional ethic framework, but more like a Individual Psychology.