6 Matching Annotations
  1. May 2022
    1. Are supporters of reproductive justice always pro-choice?

      I feel like that’s the case with anything just because somebody likes this doesn’t mean they are always interested in another

    2. ambiguity--the many possible meanings of some part of the argument.

      I never understood the word ambiguity before know and it helps me grasp tons on concepts from before now

    3. Since our goal in an assessment is to decide how effective we think the argument will be at getting its point across, any charge of vagueness implies some failure to communicate that point. This becomes a critique

      This is hard for me not to do a lot of the times especially for how long most of the writings have to be

    4. ambiguity--the many possible meanings of some part of the argument.

      I’ve never heard of that word before that’s something new and great to add to my diction

    1. The original argument does not mention any of these exceptions.  By pointing this out, we can show that the argument as expressed is invalid.

      Wow that’s crazy I’ve never really thought about how vague the constitution is in the prospective of how you put it.

    2. Arguments that start with a generalization and then apply it to specific cases are known as deductive arguments.  Those that use specific examples to arrive at a general conclusion are known as inductive arguments.

      I never knew there was a terminology for these types of arguments that’s kind of cool to know