8 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2024
    1. On the one hand, the whole planet is(unevenly) connected in global networks of information and images thattravel throughout the world instantly (Doyle, 1992). On the other hand,the media are less and less mass oriented.

      The Internet Age has brought on a phenoma of extreme societal compartmentalization, which in the modern day has resulted in the seperation of the many different groups that make up America (i.e. different ethnicities, genders, political alignments). While this separation may not be seen in day-to-day life, it has slowly caused many people to view "outsiders" in a more extreme way and for them to perceive others as having more extreme ideas that what can actually be observed face to face.

    2. By and large, most women do not accept men’s authority any longer. Thepower game has to be played out now on an interpersonal basis. Theinstitutions of society have greater difficulty than in the past in coming tothe rescue of patriarchalism.

      Due to the massive technological advances that came at the beginning of the Internet Age, women were able to join the workforce in massive numbers. By the 1990s, women no longer needed the legal or personal permission of men to live as they pleased, and the self-sufficience created by countless new jobs meant that women no longer had any logical pressures to be subservient to men. Patriarchy became illegitimate as men were generally no longer needed for women to navigate society.

    1. The lone dissenting vote came fromVinia R. Quinones, aPuerto Rican hospital administrator who was nowthe sole nonwhite member of the Board.®^Once the BHE ruled in fevor of tuition—which ranged from $387 to$462 per semester for city residents, the equivalent of about $1,635 to$1,950 today—Carey and the state legislature approved an infusion offiscal aid for the school.^® The money permitted it to reopen, but it wasstill not sufhcient to fully resolve the financial crunch.^* Five thousandpart-time and athousand full-time CUNY employees were terminated—mostly counselors, higher education oflficers, nontenured lecturers, andtenure-track faculty. (Tenured feculty were threatened with layoffs aswell, but in the end all of them kept their jobs, although ten people whohad been promised tenure were let go.)^

      Students and those who benefit from publicly-assisted programs are rarely the only people to benefit from them. Organizations like CUNY exist to benefit society as a whole. CUNY professors and instructors that taught at the university were those who were the most passionate about spreading knowledge, but they also benefitted from jobs that they could passionate about. Thousands of CUNY employees were treated as just another part of the budget cut and were sent off. This disgusting act was permitted by the BHE, who were nearly entirely white and clearly did not appreciate the value that the CUNY system in its original form provided for the disadvantaged.

    2. edgar Evers faculty membersdescribed the plan to reduce their college to atwo-year school as “bla¬tantly racist.”^^ Many suspected it was the first step toward closing theschool altogether. “Those who control the purse strings don’t give adamn” about the city’s working poor, said one professor involved withthe Student-Faculty Coalition to Save Medgar Evers College.^®

      It is clear that the CUNY schools at this time existed to serve NYC's diverse community and support the post-secondary needs of those who were unable to afford to attend expensive private universities or access technical schools. However, the students and their schools were still treated as disposable and with little care from the heads of the CUNY system. The students were being robbed of more than just an education; they were being robbed of a community that reflected who they were. It's clear that this has no value in the eyes of the heads of CUNY who only cared about maximizing profit when the university system was founded on the idea of providing education to all.

    1. Other subsidy programs were earmarked to underwrite gentrification.Tax abatements were given to those who would buy up decaying housingstock (low-cost apartments for low-income people) and refurbish it for amore affluent clientele.

      Gentrification is more than just rich people moving into low-income neighborhoods and raising housing prices. It is entirely systemic that starts with the existence of the low-income neighborhoods in the first place. After groups are marginalized and forced to live barely above or below the poverty line, they are further marginalized and villainized in the eyes of wider society. It then becomes the "responsibility" of more affluent members of society to better the community with their presence.

    2. The citygovernments appears to have followed this approach. Indeed even asbasic services to low-income residents were cut, funds were directedtoward subsidizing corporate interests on a lavish scale.

      I find it interesting that this information is so easily accessible and shows that governing bodies can and will put corporations over people. Clearly, the members of these disadvantaged communities cannot really be blamed for their worsening situation. If it is clear that cities have done this in the past on purpose, then why do many people today still continue to blame disadvantaged groups in America for their socioeconomic situation?

  2. Jan 2024
    1. In many sending countries, like India, Korea, Taiwan, and the Domi-nican Republic, the growth of high-level jobs has not kept pace with theexpansion of higher education, so that the well educated often cannot findjobs that match their training.

      Countries often experience brain-drain, resulting in their most educated citizens leaving their countries en masse. Is it possible and likely for these citizens to return to their countries and attempt to improve infrastructure and potential industries? Would it be beneficial for the next generation of people approaching working age in said countries, or would they emigrate regardless?

    2. In addition, New York is now home to a largenative black and Hispanic population, which gives the issue of competi-tion for jobs at the bottom of the occupational ladder a different tone. InChapter4, I continue the discussion of work by focusing on immigrantwomen. Since the beginning of the twentieth century, working daughtershave given way to working mothers, and the key question is how this shifthas affected immigrant women’s lives both inside and outside the home.

      Jobs in the service industry have always been in demand for "low-skill"/non-university educated people. Jobs in this industry have and are typically done by women, especially women of color. bell hooks makes note of this in her work "We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity" where she notes the fact that black American women have historically been relegated to jobs in the service industry. This lead to them often being the breadwinners of their households as black American men often had difficultly with maintaining jobs that provided enough to support their families. People will always need to be taken care of, so there will always be service jobs. In modern day America, these jobs are often held by immigrant women. For example, my immigrant mother is a CNA at a nursing home, and the vast majority of her colleagues are fellow Ghanaians, Nigerians, Jamaicans, and women from other black-majority countries. It's interesting to see how immigrants over the span of a century still gravitate to similar jobs.