tion and annotation. Try selecting this sentence and then add a note in the panel. Mobile selection quirks vary across browsers; long-press to select and adjust handles.

HTML page to test text selection and annotation. Try selecting this sentence and then add a note in the panel. Mobile selection quirks vary across browsers; long-press to select and adjust handles.

e-origin HTML page to test text selection and annotation. Try selecting this sentence and then add a note in the panel. Mobile selection quirks vary across browsers; long-press to select and adjust handles.

t text selection and annotation. Try selecting this sentence and then add a note in the panel.

age to test text selection and annotation. Try selecting this sentence and then add a note in the panel. Mobile selection quirks vary across browsers; long-press to select and adjust handles.

h The Revolution Will Not Be Funded presents no easy answers for those of us struggling both to make a living and to create social change, it exhorts us to put the consideration of our movements’ missions, and the way we fulfill them, before considerations of organizational and job security — and to regularly revisit within our organizations the question of whether the form and the content of our work are essentially compatible.” — Christy Thornton, NACLA Report on the Americas “Are non-profit organizations sufficiently accountable and responsive to the larger aims of popular social movements, or is the ‘non-profit industrial complex’ thawing the potential for fundamental social change? The Revolution Will Not Be Funded provides a variety of critical perspectives that challenge the conventional foundation model and non-profit system approa

l the ‘n

ollection will help today’s U.S.-based justice movements make sense of our responsibilities — and envision creative opportunities — to help map a transformative future for liberation.” — Joo-Hyu Kang, member, CAAAV Organizing Asian

ty to make itself safe — including to make itself safe from us and our most radical, challenging, revolutionary, feminist ideas.” — Ruthann Robson, Women’s Studies Quarterly “Although The Revolution Will Not Be Funded presents no easy answers for those of us struggling both to make a livin

The anti-Blackness embedded in this objectification can be highlighted in the complications of the Library of Congress subject headings about Black ethnic groups. According to Beall (2007), the 20th century use of the LC subject heading Negroes was transitioned to Blacks, and then to Afro-Americans, and then to African-Americans within the last few decades. As most information professionals know, cataloging backlogs are never finished, and the labor that would be required to actually alter and apply the proper subject headings in a timely manner would be deprioritized and underfunded compared to other institutional goals. As such, the frequent mis-naming and renaming of Blackness as subject headings has created a situation in which the terminology of active catalogs do not match current terms which Black people use to describe themselves.

Rare books and special collections archives serve as particularly useful focal points for observing both the causes and effects of the issue.

and information systems,

In the context of a philosophical history where non-Whites and non-males were rationalized as objects for various types of labor and breeding, Norbert Weiner’s theory that all beings are information objects is the logical, albeit limited, progression of civil society’s terms of subjection through the cybernetic understanding of the human.

rough age, &c., I must be able on the morrow to work with the same normal amount of force, health and freshness as to-day. You preach to me constantly the gospel of “saving” and “abstinence.” Good! I will, like a sensible saving owner, husband my sole wealth, labour-power, and abstain from all foolish waste of it. I will each day spend, set in motion, put into action only as much of it as is compatible with its normal duration, and healthy development. By an unlimited extension of the working-day, you may in one day use up a quantity of labour-power greater than I can restore in three.

Let us now return to our would-be capitalist. We left him just after he had purchased, in the open market, all the necessary factors of the labour process; its objective factors, the means of production, as well as its subjective factor, labour-power. With the keen eye of an expert, he has selected the means of production and the kind of labour-power best adapted to his particular trade, be it spinning, bootmaking, or any other kind. He then proceeds to consume the commodity, the labour-power that he has just bought, by causing the labourer, the impersonation of that labour-power, to consume the means of production by his labour. The general character of the labour-process is evidently not changed by the fact, that the labourer works for the capitalist instead of for himself; moreover, the particular methods and operations employed in bootmaking or spinning are not immediately changed by the intervention of the capitalist. He must begin by taking the labour-power as he finds it in the market, and consequently be satisfied with labour of such a kind as would be found in the period immediately preceding the rise of capitalists. Changes in the methods of production by the subordination of labour to capital, can take place only at a later period, and therefore will have to be treated of in a later chapter.

The price-form, however, is not only compatible with the possibility of a quantitative incongruity between magnitude of value and price, i.e., between the former and its expression in money, but it may also conceal a qualitative inconsistency, so much so, that, although money is nothing but the value-form of commodities, price ceases altogether to express value. Objects that in themselves are no commodities, such as conscience, honour, &c., are capable of being offered for sale by their holders, and of thus acquiring, through their price, the form of commodities. Hence an object may have a price without having value. The price in that case is imaginary, like certain quantities in mathematics. On the other hand, the imaginary price-form may sometimes conceal either a direct or indirect real value-relation; for instance, the price of uncultivated land, which is without value, because no human labour has been incorporated in it.

It is, in the first place, quite clear that a change in the value of gold does not, in any way, affect its function as a standard of price. No matter how this value varies, the proportions between the values of different quantities of the metal remain constant. However great the fall in its value, 12 ounces of gold still have 12 times the value of 1 ounce; and in prices, the only thing considered is the relation between different quantities of gold. Since, on the other hand, no rise or fall in the value of an ounce of gold can alter its weight, no alteration can take place in the weight of its aliquot parts. Thus gold always renders the same service as an invariable standard of price, however much its value may vary. In the second place, a change in the value of gold does not interfere with its functions as a measure of value. The change affects all commodities simultaneously, and, therefore, caeteris paribus, leaves their relative values inter se, unaltered, although those values are now expressed in higher or lower gold-prices.

A thing can be a use value, without having value. This is the case whenever its utility to man is not due to labour. Such are air, virgin soil, natural meadows, &c. A thing can be useful, and the product of human labour, without being a commodity.

epublic. If in approximately six months’ time statecapitalism became established in our Republic, this would be a great success anda sure guarantee that within a year socialism will have gained a permanently rmhold and will have become invincible in this country.