145 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2024
    1. Los Angles Mayor Karen Bass said Sunday after the tentative deal was announced, "Now, we must focus on getting the entertainment industry, and all the small businesses that depend on it, back on their feet and stronger than ever before.”

      Karen! Haven't heard about you since the LA times article... where it was noted that you didn't take a stance on this conflict while it was going on. but of course, you're here to tell everyone to get moving now that it's over!

    2. The strikes have also affected numerous businesses that rely on the entertainment industry.

      brief mentions of the economics, but pretty vague

    3. The WGA said in a statement at that time that the agreement was “made possible by the enduring solidarity of WGA members and extraordinary support of our union siblings who joined us on the picket lines for over 146 days.”

      longer section of a quote from them than I've seen in the other articles, including the mention of the "union siblings" which I don't think I've seen elsewhere

    4. The members of that union, officially the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, also are raising issues about compensation in an era of streaming and about safeguards around the use of artificial intelligence.

      solidarity was a result of similar concerns from each union

    5. was a major issue when writers hit the picket line more than four months ago.

      why is this in the past tense? it's a present problem, that's why they need a whole agreement on it...

    6. It would also raise the rates of health care and pension contributions,

      haven't really seen this brought up other places

    1. “I’m not overjoyed, I’m determined,” Aboud said. “But I feel like there are a lot of pieces to pick up.”

      less of an unrelentingly positive attitude - acknowledgement that there's still a lot of work to be done in other areas

    2. the experience of writers being able to stay writers benefits the companies,

      art is important!

    3. you get a job as a writer, you’re going to make enough or hopefully make enough to survive and also be able to hopefully ride out the downtime

      emphasis on preserving quality of life for artists

    4. David A. Goodman, co-chair of the WGA negotiating committee, called the new contract “transformative,” comparing it to a deal struck in 1960, when the guild won pension and heath care benefits.

      really makes it sound like a big deal

    5. protections around the use of AI — although the guild was not able to lock in a guarantee that studios wouldn’t use original content to “teach” AI programs.

      highlighting AI not as a major win, but as the biggest area of failure

    6. Among the important wins in the three-year contract:

      basically giving everything equal attention here

    7. “I think it’s a really great day because the writers believed in each other, and supported each other, and helped each other, and got something that’s good for all writers,” Kaplan added.

      the solidarity thing once again being an important point

    8. Jessica Goldstein, an executive producer on “That ’90s Show,

      I like that they're on the ground talking to WGA members here

    9. The length of the strike was grueling, but the contract that resulted was uniformly hailed as a big win that answers the demands of the streaming era while ensuring fair compensation for all.

      "uniformly hailed as a big win" is... certainly one way to put it? many of the other articles might disagree to an extent lol

    1. A number of celebrities—particularly talk show hosts who have fewer WGA writers on their staff—have come under fire in recent weeks for attempting to bring back their shows.

      a few articles have brought this up; I guess it emphasizes the passion of the strike supporters because they essentially bullied Drew until she backed out?

    2. The unions have argued the streaming era has diminished earning opportunities for writers and actors, as re-runs on broadcast television would earn them residual payments, but reruns on streaming platforms do not, while shorter and less frequent seasons on streaming compared to traditional network TV have also eaten into earning potential. Writers are also concerned that the growth in AI could mean their jobs get replaced by the burgeoning technology

      good summary of the streaming concerns, but not a very good summary of the AI concerns!

    3. WGA West President Meredith Stiehm told Deadline: “This strike was way too long, because the companies took so long to get serious

      like the LA times article said!

    4. the guild thanked its 11,500-strong membership for generating “leverage” with their participation in the work stoppage.

      emphasis on the strength of the union

    5. Writers were pushing for streaming residuals and protections against the threat of AI in the film industry

      mentions these in the same sentence here - but more points below are dedicated to AI stuff than streaming stuff

    1. A prolonged production shutdown could hurt the workers that help support productions, such as drivers, dry cleaners, caterers, carpenters and lumber yard workers. In the 2007 strike, which lasted 100 days, the Los Angeles economy took an estimated $2.1 billion hit.

      like some of the other articles, there is a concern for the wider economic impact

    2. The fallout has been significant. Disney is in the midst of laying off 7,000 workers. Warner Bros. Discovery cut thousands of jobs and shelved titles last year as they confronted a huge debt load. Many other studios are adopting similar cost-saving measures.

      framing this as practicality - not quite making excuses for the studios, but trying to help the reader understand their side I guess

    3. They are also fighting what they describe as “abuses” of so-called minirooms.

      haven't seen any other article touch on this specific complaint

    4. But compensation is the most crucial issue to them.

      taking a strong stance that the streaming wars are the main event here

    5. guardrails about artificial intelligence.

      there's the "guardrails" thing again

    6. Historically, yes. There have been decades-long tensions between writers and the studios, with writers often feeling like second-class citizens

      this comment on the history is interesting

    7. Television production has grown rapidly over the past decade, as media companies have invested billions into streaming services. But the writers have said that their compensation has stagnated.

      streaming wars get top billing here

    1. Original writers on older cable and network TV projects that have subsequently aired on streamers will remain uncompensated by the newer platforms.

      this is kind of ridiculous... as it says in the next paragraph, a lot of these shows get WAY more streams than the original content. don't they deserve compensation for their work just like everyone else?

    2. Under the contract, AI can't be used to write or rewrite literary material. However, a writer can choose to use the services of AI for projects, provided consent has been given by companies and the individual follows certain policies. A writer cannot be compelled to use AI software.

      details given on this front are pretty similar to the other articles

    3. the new agreement requires them to share only the cumulative number of hours streamed, as opposed to information on how many people have watched a show or film in total—data that Netflix has already been sharing since 2020 via its weekly Top 10 lists.

      so what was the new victory here, exactly?

    4. The new agreement will see residuals paid out on projects that "are viewed by 20% or more of the service's domestic subscribers in the first 90 days of release, or in the first 90 days in any subsequent exhibition year."The WGA's access to information from these platforms will be limited to confidential reports of "the total number of hours streamed, both domestically and internationally, of self-produced high budget streaming programs (e.g., a Netflix original series)."

      there definitely seems like there could be ways for companies to work around this...

    5. Before the agreement, screenwriters on such projects as reboots, remakes and existing intellectual property (for example, films based on books, comics, or consumer products like Barbie) were not entitled to such payment. This led to concerns that studios would pursue more IP-driven projects and fewer original ideas in a bid to cut costs.

      bringing in other hot topics like the constant presence of IP is helpful for framing this

    6. For writers who aren't yet viewed as prolific showrunners, this exception could likely become a bone of contention in the coming years, as these auteur showrunners will no longer be required to take on a writing staff or run a writers' room.

      interesting conundrum

    7. Shows that have a run of seven to 12 episodes per season are required to hire five writers, while series that have a run of 13 episodes or more must take on six writers. Of these totals, three writer-producers are required to be onboard.

      again, I like that they give numerical details of this stuff

    8. those who write for Netflix will see the streaming platform's three-year foreign residuals rise from the current structure of $18,684 for a one-hour episode to $32,830

      this numerical data is good to include

    9. Before streaming became dominant, this often meant payment for cable reruns, syndication, home video releases, and streaming licensing windows, with checks coming anytime an episode of TV you participated in was repeated on cable. For projects that are produced for the streaming platforms, residual payments generally start after a show's 90-day window on the service.

      they do a good job of explaining what has changed here, which not a lot of the articles do

    10. Residuals are payments negotiated by the unions that key members of a production—such as actors, writers, and directors—are paid by studios to cover any time a TV show or movie is watched beyond its initial compensation window, with payments decreasing every year

      again, I like that they're defining their terms here

    11. A summary of the agreement published on the WGA's website

      solid source

    12. representatives of AMPTP said that the trade association "presented a deal that offered historic pay and residual increases, substantially higher caps on pension and health contributions, audition protections, shortened series option periods, and a groundbreaking AI proposal that protects actors' digital likenesses for SAG-AFTRA members."

      they're really high on their own supply, huh?

    13. The studios' refusal to rule out artificial intelligence one day replacing human workers escalated the tensions.

      so AI does get first billing here, but less dramatically - the streaming wars stuff is mentioned right below and given pretty much equal attention

    14. The AMPTP comprises the major studios: Netflix, Amazon, Apple, Disney, Warner Bros., NBC Universal, Sony, and Paramount.

      I like that they define this, I feel like many of the articles don't

    15. The industrial action saw a number of shows postponed or canceled as writers were no longer permitted to contribute to scripts on projects either in development or in production.

      haven't seen much in other articles to acknowledge this, so it's interesting that it's here

    1. and they won big

      did they?

    2. October had long been seen as kind of a last-ditch moment for an agreement to be reached without catastrophic meltdowns in the industry. That said, many workers inside and outside Hollywood have incurred immense financial losses during the strike, and studios like Warner Bros. Discovery, which initially saw a bump to their bottom line, have projected lower earnings for 2023, by $300 million to $500 million.

      briefly touching on the economic effects as the LA times did

    3. the WGA’s agreement with the AMPTP historically sets the template for Hollywood’s other trade unions.

      according to what proof?

    4. This timeline is similar to the events ending the last strike, which happened 15 years ago.

      interesting statement to make in comparison to the LA times, which really emphasizes the differences between the current strike and the previous one

    5. the WGA contract is likely to influence the terms of SAG-AFTRA’s ongoing negotiations

      emphasis on the connection between these strikes and how they may help each other even in their resolution

    6. “the WGA reserves the right to assert that exploitation of writers’ material to train AI is prohibited by MBA or other law” — a major issue given many authors’ recent discovery that their work is being used to train AI owned by Meta and other companies.

      they do take time to emphasize this, but not as much as the AP

    7. The MOA includes increases to minimum wage and compensation, increased pension and health fund rates, improvements to terms for length of employment and size of writing teams (which had been shrinking drastically in recent years), and better residuals (which are like royalties), including foreign streaming residuals.

      brings up these other protections before AI

    8. President Joe Biden, who is set to join striking auto workers on their picket line on Tuesday, issued a statement applauding the writers’ tentative deal. “There simply is no substitute for employers and employees coming together to negotiate in good faith toward an agreement that makes a business stronger and secures the pay, benefits, and dignity that workers deserve,” he said.

      shouting out that Biden supported them - didn't see this in the other articles

    9. The strike officially ended in the wee hours of Wednesday, September 27, after 148 days,

      important date!

    1. What most observers agree on, though, is that this was just the first of many AI labor disputes.

      once again, coming back to this note of doubt - how much did the writers actually win?

    2. Robert D. Atkinson, president of the tech policy think tank Information Technology & Innovation Foundation, said limiting AI is unproductive.“If we ban the use of tools to make organizations more productive, we are consigning ourselves to stagnation,” Atkinson write on X, formerly known as Twitter.

      this guy clearly has an interest in business, not art

    3. Some skeptics doubt whether the writers made significant headway on AI. Media mogul Barry Diller, chairman of the digital media company IAC, believes not enough was done.

      interesting to include this questioning perspective

    4. David Gunkel, a professor of media studies at Northern Illinois University

      source

    5. Last week, 17 authors, including John Grisham, Jonathan Franzen and George R.R. Martin, filed a lawsuit against OpenAI alleging the “systematic theft on a massive scale” of their copyrighted books.

      important evidence confirming that this is a concern that extends beyond the world of screenwriting

    6. they hashed out terms while noting that the outlook is certain to change. Under the draft contract, “the parties acknowledge that the legal landscape around the use of (generative AI) is uncertain and rapidly developing.”

      the protections are tentative because the technology is evolving so quickly

    7. Language over AI became a sticking point in the writers’ negotiations, which dragged on last week in part due to the challenges of bargaining on such a fast-evolving technology.

      reasoning for why negotiations dragged on are different than the other article

    8. Tom Davenport, a professor of information technology at Babson College and author of “ All-in on AI: How Smart Companies Win Big with Artificial Intelligence.” “It pretty much insures that if you’re going to use AI, it’s going to be humans working alongside AI.

      credible source for input on AI

    9. The strike was also about streaming-era economics, writers room minimums and residuals — not exactly compelling picket-sign fodder. But the threat of AI vividly cast the writers’ plight as a human-versus-machine clash, with widespread implications for other industries facing a radically new kind of automation.

      claiming that the AI thing was more marketable to the public than the streaming wars stuff

    10. During the nearly five-month walkout, no issue resonated more than the use of AI in script writing.

      this article claims AI is the main enemy here and the main thing writers were fighting against - different from the LA times article

    11. screenwriters secured significant guardrails

      metaphor - protection from falling down/off something

    1. the real narrative of this strike is that 11,000 WGA members, most of whom you’ve never heard of, and 160,000 members of SAG-AFTRA, many of whom you’ve never heard of, had the power together to bring change.”

      Keyser telling us what the "real" narrative is - but as the next sentence suggests, the deal doesn't mean change will be easy, so whether this truly ends up being a victory remains to be seen

    2. The studios pushed back. “Guys, we’re on the 5-yard line, don’t come back here and say it’s a new kickoff,” said Zaslav, according to a person in the room.

      this is apparently Zaslav's language, not the author's, but the sports metaphor is still interesting

    3. “The longer the strike goes on, what I’m sensing is firmer resolve and more anger. We aren’t only striking for ourselves — we’re striking for the writers who come after us.”

      the strikers are thinking about the extended consequences of their decisions

    4. Underscoring the lack of trust between the two sides, the studios immediately released a summary of their offer publicly. The CEOs believed the public release helped put pressure on WGA leadership.

      this is interpretation - the intention does seem obvious, but can we really know it?

    5. the writers left angry, saying they’d been subjected to a “lecture” about the strength of the studios’ offer. The studios only wanted them to “cave,” they said in a message to members.

      months had passed, and studios still weren't taking it seriously

    6. according to people familiar with the situation who were not authorized to discuss it.

      interesting source?

    7. Complicating matters was the more diverse makeup of the alliance, which now included tech giants Amazon, Apple and Netflix, which had long resisted the idea of sharing streaming data — a chief concern for writers.

      so there were conflicting interests/values withing the AMPTP

    8. The strike did provide a short-term financial benefit for the companies. Paramount Global, Disney, Amazon Studios and others saved hundreds of millions of dollars that otherwise would have been spent making and marketing shows. For some of the traditional companies, the savings boosted their stretched balance sheets, which they use to impress Wall Street, in an otherwise challenging year.

      kind of icky how they used this to their advantage

    9. While the Los Angeles City Council unanimously passed a resolution supporting the writers and several members popped up on the picket lines, Mayor Karen Bass studiously avoided entering the fray. There was speculation during the summer that the coalition-building politician might attempt to broker peace in Hollywood, but such a mediator role did not come to pass.

      interesting to hear how the city/politicians engaged with this and how that may have served their own interests

    10. The presence of SAG-AFTRA members on picket lines reenergized the writers’ cause.

      unlike 07 when solidarity quickly waned, in this case there was a huge second wind with the SAG strike adding to the strength of the movement

    11. she blasted what she regarded as the greed of the studios and streamers.

      this is a careful statement - it's not the article calling the studios greedy, it's Drescher

    12. In an interview with CNBC on the day the actors’ strike began, Disney’s Iger called strikers’ demands ill-timed and “not realistic.” To many, Iger’s argument was undermined by the fact that he was speaking from Allen & Co.’s Sun Valley Conference in Idaho, informally known as “summer camp for billionaires.” Mountain meadowlarks chirped in the background.

      really great snapshot of how little Iger cares

    13. Days after the Deadline article was published, the writers got thousands of new allies on picket lines. On July 13, SAG-AFTRA announced its own strike against the AMPTP, ratcheting up tensions in an industry that had not seen a joint strike by actors and writers since 1960.

      ultimately, it doesn't matter if the quote was real or not - it increased support, which makes it important no matter what.

    14. “The most amazing thing about that quote was that somebody said it out loud,” Brian T. Arnold, a WGA strike captain at Paramount Pictures, said this week. “It laid out the way the AMPTP feels about artists and feels about their writers.

      but do we know that they actually said it?

    15. An AMPTP spokesperson said the anonymous person was “not speaking on behalf” of the alliance or its members.

      I remember the article described above, but I don't think I ever saw that the AMPTP denied that quote came from them, so this is interesting

    16. That support was vividly on display in late May when Zaslav was met with a chorus of boos from students when he received an honorary degree and delivered the commencement address at Boston University.

      great example of support being shown from outside the industry

    17. the guild also moved aggressively

      "aggressive" has a somewhat negative connotation, but I think it's trying to convey power and motivation

    18. the battle played out as much on social media as it did on the picket lines, with writers portraying executives as callous, overpaid fat cats unconcerned about the workers they profited from. On picket lines, writers hoisted signs bearing easy-to-grasp messages such as “The CEOs Have Yachts, Writers Have Mortgages” and “We Just Want 2% From the 1%.”

      warfare language again, and an interesting description of the rhetoric the WGA was using to gain support

    19. Cal State Northridge associate professor of entertainment media management Todd Holmes estimates that the dual strikes have cost California’s economy about $5 billion.

      a californian and someone who studies entertainment media - good source

    20. the stage was set

      performance metaphor

    21. Media companies have cut nearly 20,000 jobs in the last 18 months — about a third of those at Disney.

      once again bringing up Disney specifically, which is interesting since Iger is the first studio guy name-dropped in this article

    22. We fought in their streaming wars

      the "streaming wars" language is, as always, an interesting metaphor

    23. The median weekly pay for writer-producers has declined by 23% over the last decade, according to the WGA’s figures.

      more numerical data - directly from the WGA

    24. 599 scripted original series ran on linear channels and streaming services

      numerical data

    25. years of mounting frustration over the industry’s shift toward a streaming-centered business model suddenly exploded into public view.

      highlighting streaming as an important part of the conflict

    26. WGA West President Meredith Stiehm: “We won.”

      victory!

    27. With the new three-year agreement, the WGA gained much of what it had demanded back in April, including higher pay, minimum staffing requirements in writers’ rooms, bonuses for successful streaming shows and protections against the threat of screenwriters being replaced by artificial intelligence. The studios agreed to guarantee second-step payments to film screenwriters so they don’t have to spend months and months doing rewrites without a check.

      linking directly to the source here to back up claims

    28. “It took the AMPTP, and eventually the CEOs, 102 days to even understand that the game they had played in 2007 was not going to happen this time,” Keyser said this week in an interview.

      this time is different.

    29. Fifteen years ago, solidarity between the industry’s unions — and among writers themselves — had quickly frayed as the economic toll of the labor action began to mount.

      interesting to blame a lack of solidarity for the dissolution of the last strike

    30. a perfect storm of trends — deep anxieties over new technology, a nationwide surge in pro-labor activism, the messaging power of social media and historic solidarity among entertainment industry workers — collided with tactical miscalculations by studio chiefs to bring Hollywood to its knees.

      the main claim of the article

    31. “It shouldn’t have taken this long,” said entertainment lawyer Robert Schwartz, who was not involved in the deal.

      is he a valid source if he has no connection to this situation?

    32. On Wednesday, the strike ended after 148 days, making it one of the industry’s longest.

      establishing that this was LONG, because the length is an important part of the question they're trying to answer

    33. In an industry founded on creative collaboration, how did the two sides end up so deeply distrustful of one another that the business was brought to a grinding halt, causing billions of dollars in economic pain not only in Hollywood but for the Los Angeles economy as a whole?

      the main question they're investigating - how and why did this take so long?

    34. Iger promised to spend as long as it would take to get a deal done, according to people close to the process who were not authorized to speak publicly.

      what does "people close to the process" mean? did he really promise?

    35. Chris Keyser, the WGA Negotiating Committee’s co-chairman

      establishing Keyser as a "main character" in this story

    36. Writers Guild of America against the major media companies

      establishing the "us vs. them" - the 2 sides of the conflict

    1. compared with 48% in urban schools.

      with error included, this could be 50.2%, which would make it a majority as well (just barely)

    2. Democratic teachers are more likely than Republican teachers to say this (73% vs. 66%)

      when we bring error into the equation, the gap between these numbers is pretty miniscule - definitely much closer than those accompanying the other responses. it would be interesting to see a breakdown of these divisions for the "somewhat effective," "not too effective," and "not at all effective" answers, as well

    3. About four-in-ten teachers (39%) say their school has done a fair or poor job providing them with the training and resources they need to deal with a potential active shooter.

      I'm not a huge fan of how this data is grouped, because personally I think "fair" and "poor" have pretty different connotations... lumping these two descriptors into the "worst" category together makes the situation more dire than it may actually be

    4. survey methodology.

      the methodology notes that these survey results have a sampling error of +/- 2.4%

    5. we surveyed 2,531 U.S. public K-12 teachers from Oct. 17 to Nov. 14, 2023. The teachers are members of RAND’s American Teacher Panel, a nationally representative panel of public school K-12 teachers recruited through MDR Education.

      this is not a random sample of teachers; they were all part of a specific panel of recruited individuals.

  2. Mar 2024
    1. crisis

      ending with more language that really illustrates the severity of the situation

    2. “The equity stakes are monumental,” said Kim Cook, the chief executive of the National College Attainment Network. “The later those letters come, the more the conversation shifts from where to go to if to go.”

      source - I've never heard of this "NCAN" thing, but I guess they're legit?

    3. There are growing concerns that the FAFSA problems will disproportionately affect traditionally underserved communities, particularly Black, Latino, first-generation and low-income students.

      once again emphasizing the specific impact on minorities

    4. James Kvaal, the under secretary at the Education Department.

      source

    5. at the request of Republicans, who say it took a back seat to other priorities, like President Biden’s student loan debt forgiveness programs.

      second reference to Biden, this time sort of implying that the Republicans are blaming him/his focus on other policies for the FAFSA problems

    6. Andrea, 17

      we already saw a picture of her above, but it's good to have another one in close proximity to her actual statements in the article

    7. pernicious flaw

      great word choice here - "pernicious" = highly destructive, even deadly. really implies the gravity of the situation

    8. “It’s agonizing,” said Andrea, 17, who asked to be identified by her first name to protect her parents, who immigrated to the United States from Mexico and are undocumented. “It’s deeper than a form. It’s our futures.”

      good quote, & the specific context of this girl's family situation helps craft a strong pathos appeal

    9. Andrea, a senior at KIPP Denver Collegiate High School in Colorado, will be the first person in her family to attend college.

      source - student with personal story

    10. The government needs the FAFSA information to calculate how much federal aid students should receive. The schools, in turn, need that number to make their own calculations about how much a student should expect to pay at that particular college or university, after tallying up tuition and any extra scholarships.

      highlighting this domino effect again

    11. critical function

      strong diction once again leaning into that sense of urgency/importance

    12. Students reported being repeatedly kicked out or locked out of the form, or hung up on after holding for 30 minutes to three hours for someone to answer

      good to actually give examples of the "malfunctions" the paragraph references, rather than just saying there were malfunctions.

    13. according to recordings of two back-to-back meetings

      source - recordings of meetings

    14. A Biden administration official, who asked for anonymity to discuss details of the process, said the department had begun sending out “small batches” of data over the weekend.

      source - interesting that they wanted to be anonymous... in terms of phrasing, it's also interesting to specifically invoke Biden's name here, sort of pointing out that he's the one at the head of the government that's having all these issues

    15. “Financial aid offices across the country are hanging on by their fingernails at this point,” said Justin Draeger, the chief executive of the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators.

      source

    16. Many schools are pushing back their enrollment deadlines to give students more time to figure out their finances, throwing college budgets and wait lists into chaos.

      noting the domino effect of this - it's having an impact on the processes of the educational institutions as well as the students

    17. Richard Cordray,

      like I said above, they attempt to paint Cordray as a hero of sorts - having his picture adds to this

    18. A series of blunders by the department — from a haphazard rollout to technical meltdowns — have left students and schools in limbo and plunged the most critical stage of the college admissions season into disarray.

      sense of messiness and urgency being created by word choice - "blunders" again, "haphazard," "meltdowns" contribute to former, "in limbo," "critical stage," contribute to latter.

    19. bureaucratic mess

      kind of appealing to our collective hatred of bureaucracy here

    20. millions of families and thousands of schools rely on

      news value - impact. this matters to a LOT of people.

    21. exasperated staff member

      strong adjective that presumably depicts the state of mind of many employees of the dept. of ed

    22. fateful

      invoking "fate" because the fates/futures of these students are a big part of what this article is concerned with

    23. Karen Chavez, the assistant principal of college and career at a high school in Denver, and her student Andrea.

      giving us pictures of the people whose personal stories will come in later

    24. The Education Department

      ed dpt. is a "main character" of sorts in this story. perhaps a villain.

    25. Blunders That Plunged the College Admission Season Into Disarray

      "blunders" and "disarray" establish a sense of chaos

    26. Inside

      adds to the interest of the article by implying it's some kind of "inside look"

    27. the consequences of the FAFSA delays could be on par with the devastation that historically Black colleges and universities experienced in 2011, when the government made it harder for parents to obtain loans to help pay for their children’s educations.

      once again emphasizing how FAFSA delays and problems are most likely to impact minority groups

    28. as of last week, officials had met in person with only 20 of the 180 schools that had reached out for extra support

      can't even deliver on their reparatory measures!

    29. Student advocates fear many of them will simply give up, skipping college or relying on expensive loans to pay for it.

      leans a little bit into the "college is necessary/the best choice after high school" pov, when in reality there are other options

    30. Even as the department has tried to project optimism about its progress, officials privately harbored doubts.

      is this trying to project optimism or just a lack of integrity?

    31. senior officials at the White House and the Education Department have cited unreasonably short timelines, contractors who blew past deadlines and insufficient funding.Credit...

      blaming everyone but themselves

    32. There were obvious misses, such as a lack of robust user testing needed to catch what would turn out to be dozens of major technical problems. And the Education Department realized only in November that it had not adjusted a critical income formula, which would have denied more than $1 billion in aid to students.

      these seem like some problems that could have been pretty easy fixes! and yet, here we are

    33. it’s been a top priority for us at the very highest levels of the department going back a year and a half now

      has it?

    34. The company, General Dynamics Information Technology, had been involved in HealthCare.gov — an Obama-era online insurance marketplace that had a notoriously rough rollout in 2013.

      why hire this company if they screwed things up before???

    35. They spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.

      so many anonymous sources!

    36. officials acknowledged that other important assignments, such as restarting federal loan repayments and reopening schools after the coronavirus pandemic, used up vital resources.

      definitely trying to paint themselves as the good guys - saying the reason they got behind on this was from trying to help students in other ways

    37. “This is a lot of the Dreamers, new immigrants and the kind of people who, if they can just get a hand up in the higher education process can make their way in this country,” Mr. Cordray said. “We want them to be able to do that.”

      coming back to this guy to show that the employees/people in charge of this process aren't necessarily bad people and seem to be trying to help

    38. the first sign of hope that college is within reach.

      dramatic but okay

    39. The goal of the revamped FAFSA system was to simplify the notoriously bewildering form by whittling it down from more than 100 questions to fewer than 40 and making it more accessible to lower-income students.

      emphasizing the initial goal to set up the explanation of how the goal failed to be met

    40. The department is working with 5.7 million applications that are in so far, but more than 10 million additional ones are expected to roll in as students make their way through the process, which is still not functioning without delays.

      getting some numerical data in

    41. It was another setback in the botched rollout

      emphasizing this is one in a series of unfortunate events

    42. more than 200 of the department’s employees, including Richard Cordray, the nation’s top student aid official, to read through each of the emails one by one and extract crucial identifying information required for financial aid. The students’ futures depended on it.

      painting Cordray as kind of a hero figure