7 Matching Annotations
  1. May 2018
    1. “Powerful parents demand something in return for their commitment to public education—for keeping their children in public schools, as opposed to fleeing to the private schools that many could afford” (p. 139). Affluent parents of successful students are less concerned that all children have access to a quality education and are more concerned that their own children have access to the best type of instruction, are tracked in Advanced Placement and Gifted and Talented Programs, and are recognized with strong letter grades and awards for their academic success (Kohn, 1998). This demand for differentiation (Wells & Oakes, 1996) or advocacy for tracking (McGrath & Kuriloff, 1999) is a type of parent involvement that can be detrimental to students and schools. As Casanova (1996) warns of “con-trolling parents,” they also deprofessionalize teachers and exacerbate the unequal treatment of all parents in schools further stratifying the involved and uninvolved parent along race and class lines.

      This section reminds me of some of the parents in my community. I've been teaching in different schools in the Stapleton neighborhood for about three years now. I've observed the behaviors presented in this text myself and have heard numerous observations from colleagues. This presents a really interesting situation for teachers. On one hand, you have parents who are very invested in their child's education. They are super supportive and love to be involved in the classroom and the school. It's great to have parents who are invested and enthusiastic about their child's schooling. But then, the power dynamics come into play like the behaviors Casanova describes. In these situations, teachers feel intimidated by these parents because of the power and influence they hold within the school and community. Parents want the best for their children, so how can we engage them in ways to ensure the best for all of the children in the school? Most of these parents have multiple ways in which they can support the school. I wonder if there's a way for the school to find a way to get them involved in a way that would end up benefiting all students.

    2. Time poverty (Newman & Chin, 2003) refers to a family’s lack of time due to other commitments;

      Time Poverty is a factor that often gets overlooked by schools. Parents and educators can both relate to the fact that there aren't enough hours in the day to accomplish everything you need to get done. Parents have other commitments with work or family matters that keep them from being involved at school. How can we include families into the classroom who are unable to attend classroom or school events due to busy work schedules?

  2. doc-14-6k-docs.googleusercontent.com doc-14-6k-docs.googleusercontent.com
    1. TIAF taps neighborhood social capital (as found, for example, in churches) for the construction of new ideas and actions related to schools and other organizations of influence

      This gives me a new perspective on the involvement of religious institutions with education. My gut reaction is to keep the two separate, but context is always important. In rural areas, churches are places where large groups of people regularly convene. Using these spaces to generate ideas and support is a great way to use the resources in a community.

    2. Community-based educational leadership—that which is immersed in urban life and committed to urban transformation can openly counter institu-tional and social structures that perpetuate injustice, exploitation, and vio-lence. Armed with emic love and historical understanding, Freirean leadership engages oppression at its core without fear of professional repercussions

      I love this approach to educational leadership. We need to stop relying on the schools to fix all of the issues in our community. All community members need to work as one to solve the issues plaguing our communities instead of piling all of the responsibilities onto one institution. I'm reminded of the history of the schools in Reggio-Emilia and how it was a true communal effort to build the first school.

    3. Critical thinking Leaders and followers are aware of systems and structures of oppression and actively seek to change them

      In the last assignment I completed for the Social Foundations class, the main idea was how to be a critically reflective teacher. It is crucial for teachers, who are leaders in their classrooms and communities, to critically reflect about the structures and systems within their school and local community.

    4. In essence, the correct posture of one who does not consider him- or herself to be the sole possessor of the truth or the passive

      This quote reminds me of the "white savior" complex and how damaging it is for all parties. When you approach a situation believing you have all the knowledge necessary and are there to "save" students, schools, communities, etc., you are further disenfranchising people and creating more problems.

    1. A macrosystem differs in a fundamental wayfrom the preceding forms in that it refers not tothe specific contexts affecting the life of a par-ticular person but to general prototypes, existingin the culture or subculture, that set the patternfor the structures and activities occurring at theconcrete level.

      The society in which a child is brought up in has a huge effect on their growth and development. The societal norms they are surrounded by will influence their actions and beliefs. You can see the differences between adults who were brought up in different states around the United States. When I recount experiences from my childhood in the South, they differ from my friends' experiences from growing up in the mid-West. It's interesting that where you were born has a factor in your development.