Wage-labour
Are they predicting that wage labor will not exist one day?
Wage-labour
Are they predicting that wage labor will not exist one day?
It is unfit to rule because it is incompetent to assure an existence to its slave within his slavery, because it cannot help letting him sink into such a state, that it has to feed him, instead of being fed by him. Society can no longer live under this bourgeoisie, in other words, its existence is no longer compatible with society.
Their cannot be a Jeff Bezozs without the working class. Their cannot be a bouesgeois without the proletariat. If the 99% cannot exist because of the way the 1% has controled society, that society will not exist. It is not sustainable.
nally, in times when the class struggle nears the decisive hour, the process of dissolution going on within the ruling class, in fact within the whole range of society, assumes such a violent, glaring character, that a small section of the ruling class cuts itself adrift, and joins the revolutionary class, the class that holds the future in its hands. Just as, therefore, at an earlier period, a section of the nobility went over to the bourgeoisie, so now a portion of the bourgeoisie goes over to the proletariat, and in particular, a portion of the bourgeois ideologists, who have raised themselves to the level of comprehending theoretically the historical movement as a whole.
What in modern times would actually motive this type of change, if anything?
. At first with the aristocracy; later on, with those portions of the bourgeoisie itself, whose interests have become antagonistic to the progress of industry; at all times, with the bourgeoisie of foreign countries. In all these battles it sees itself compelled to appeal to the proletariat, to ask for its help, and thus, to drag it into the political arena. The bourgeoisie itself, therefore, supplies the proletariat with its own instruments of political and general education, in other words, it furnishes the proletariat with weapons for fighting the bourgeoisie.
I think, in America we see that the aristocracy is so entangled with the bouegeoisie that the routes given to the proletarians is ineffective.
At this stage the labourers still form an incoherent mass scattered over the whole country, and broken up by their mutual competition.
Reminds me of the walstreet protests which were mostly peaceful sit ins.
partly because their specialized skill is rendered worthless by the new methods of production. Thus the proletariat is recruited from all classes of the population.
The starving artist archetype?
bourgeoisie, the landlord, the shopkeeper, the pawnbrok
Those who make their money off of the hourly wages of the working class.
In proportion therefore, as the repulsiveness of the work increases, the wage decreases. Nay more, in proportion as the use of machinery and division of labour increases, in the same proportion the burden of toil also increases, whether by prolongation of the working hours, by increase of the work exacted in a given time or by increased speed of the machinery, etc
An explanation of minimum wage.
the epidemic of over-production
This concept seems to relate to some of the suffering experienced during this current pandemic. Overproduction and an emphasis on productivity has changed our culture so much that we strugle to survive without it. Despite the over production many do not have their basic needs met. This is esspecially true of the most heavily exploited populations.
nations into civilisation
History of colonialism for the sake of exploitation.
In place of the old wants, satisfied by the productions of the country, we find new wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of distant lands and climes
Consumerism become part of our culture to support the existance of the bourgeoisie.
for which the discovery of America paved the way. This market has given an immense development to commerce, to navigation, to communication by land. This development has, in its time, reacted on the extension of industry; and in proportion as industry, commerce, navigation, railways extended, in the same proportion the bourgeoisie developed, increased its capital, and pushed into the background every class handed down from the Middle Ages.
This type of develpment has never been sustainable.
rapid development
This seems to always be dependent on resources and how to best exploit them.
Bourgeoisie and Proletariat
Today, this might translate as the 99% and the 1%. Although, we can also recognize the inner order within those groups as well.
In the earlier epochs of history, we find almost everywhere a complicated arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold gradation of social rank. In ancient Rome we have patricians, knights, plebeians, slaves; in the Middle Ages, feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters, journeymen, apprentices, serfs; in almost all of these classes, again, subordinate gradations.
Just like the social divisions we see today, this type of order has always existed and impacted our societies.