121 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2019
    1. Most people like themselves well enough, and most people identify themselves as members of certain groups but not others.

      we define ourselves by what we are not

    2. the superiority of certain groups: men, native-born residents, heterosexuals, and believers in the dominant religion. This means seeing women, minorities, homosexuals, and non-believers as inferior. Understandably, the first list of groups tend to score higher on SDO, while the second group tends to score lowe

      the effect of power ownership in this is huge

    3. In general, those high in SDO have a strong belief in work ethic—that hard work always pays off and leisure is a waste of time. People higher on SDO tend to choose and thrive in occupations that maintain existing group hierarchies

      reminds me of the law of the jungle

    4. or example, researchers have found that those who score higher on SDO are usually lower than average on tolerance, empathy, altruism, and community orientation.

      the result of bias can go on different scales

    5. describes a belief that group hierarchies are inevitable in all societies and are even a good idea to maintain order and stability

      which is not exactly true due to the existing problems because of social dominance

    6. First, we’ll discuss old-fashioned biases that might have belonged to our grandparents and great-grandparents—or even the people nowadays who have yet to leave those wrongful times. Next, we will discuss late 20th century biases that affected our parents and still linger today. Finally, we will talk about today’s 21st century biases that challenge fairness and respect for all.

      I wonder how relevant this is to understanding biases in general

  2. Sep 2019
    1. Although it is permissible to observe people’s actions in public—even without them knowing—researchers cannot violate their privacy by observing them in restrooms or other private spaces without their knowledge and consent. Researchers also may not identify individual participants in their research reports (we typically report only group means and other statistics). With online data collection becoming increasingly popular, researchers also have to be mindful that they follow local data privacy laws, collect only the data that they really need (e.g., avoiding including unnecessary questions in surveys), strictly restrict access to the raw data, and have a plan in place to securely destroy the data after it is no longer needed.

      the idea is to analyze a group of people's behavior as a whole and not specific individuals

    2. Informed consent: In general, people should know when they are involved in research, and understand what will happen to them during the study (at least in general terms that do not give away the hypothesis).

      consent can be played with and manipulated like the Stanford Prison example

    3. Aside from being an overrepresentation of young, middle-class Caucasians, college students may also be more compliant and more susceptible to attitude change,

      racial factor is actually pretty important too especially within the US context

    4. Along with our counterparts in the other areas of psychology, social psychologists have been guilty of largely recruiting samples of convenience from the thin slice of humanity—students—found at universities and colleges

      or in other cases, countries with different social contexts and systems

    5. . This would be an example of archival research.

      this is what most students at my age do, because of lack of access to the other methods and tools

    6. . Such failures to replicate findings highlight the need to ensure that both the original studies and replications are carefully designed, have adequate sample sizes, and that researchers pre-register their hypotheses and openly share their results—whether these support the initial hypothesis

      The question is: if they fail, does that mean they are not valid? maybe the failure was in the justification and not the conclusion

    7. Although the judges consciously completed the survey, what makes this a study of priming is that the second task (sentencing) was unrelated, so any influence of the survey on their later judgments would have been nonconscious.

      It is interesting to see the relationship between these two ideas

    8. The methods we have considered thus far—field experiments, naturalistic observation, and surveys—work well when the thoughts, feelings, or behaviors being investigated are conscious and directly or indirectly observable. However, social psychologists often wish to measure or manipulate elements that are involuntary or nonconscious, such as when studying prejudicial attitudes people may be unaware of or embarrassed by.

      Could therapy analysis here be a technique of research there?

    9. In this diverse world, survey research offers itself as an invaluable tool for social psychologists to study individual and group differences in people’s feelings, attitudes, or behaviors.

      This gives analysis from the actual target internal thoughts and not external behaviors

    10. n cases where it’s not practical or ethical to randomly assign participants to different experimental conditions, we can use naturalistic observation—unobtrusively watching people as they go about their lives

      We are just take the normal human analysis to a step that it is more structural and organized

    11. leave the laboratory to collect data on life as it is actually lived. To do so, they use a variation of the laboratory experiment, called a field experimen

      This is the opposite of the laboratory context, however i don't think the results would also be opposing

    12. riding in competitive races appeared to improve riders’ times by about 20-30 seconds every mile compared to when they rode the same courses alone.

      this sentence has some interesting implications to it

    13. riding in competitive races appeared to improve riders’ times by about 20-30 seconds every mile compared to when they rode the same courses alone.

      This has to contradict with other sciences like Economics where they apply the concept of ceteris paribus, where they only deal with one variable holding everything else constant

    14. riding in competitive races appeared to improve riders’ times by about 20-30 seconds every mile compared to when they rode the same courses alone.

      Is this where the ethical issues come in?

    15. riding in competitive races appeared to improve riders’ times by about 20-30 seconds every mile compared to when they rode the same courses alone.

      It is interesting to see that this process seems pretty objective that even robotic elements started to take the place of human judges

    16. riding in competitive races appeared to improve riders’ times by about 20-30 seconds every mile compared to when they rode the same courses alone.

      I wonder if researching the same hypothesis with different research methods would sometimes give us unmatching or even contradicting results? Therefore, do we need to do most or even all these experiments to ensure the validity of their results?

    17. riding in competitive races appeared to improve riders’ times by about 20-30 seconds every mile compared to when they rode the same courses alone.

      This happens to restrict the spontaneous aspect of the experiment and it might add expectations on the subjects which makes the whole thing limited and unreliable

    18. riding in competitive races appeared to improve riders’ times by about 20-30 seconds every mile compared to when they rode the same courses alone.

      This is what normal observations look like, they cannot be considered as objective and truthful as experiments

    19. riding in competitive races appeared to improve riders’ times by about 20-30 seconds every mile compared to when they rode the same courses alone.

      This is interesting because there was no genuine intention to actually follow scientific research methods

    20. riding in competitive races appeared to improve riders’ times by about 20-30 seconds every mile compared to when they rode the same courses alone.

      Outcome, conclusion?

    21. riding in competitive races appeared to improve riders’ times by about 20-30 seconds every mile compared to when they rode the same courses alone.

      Methodology?

    22. riding in competitive races appeared to improve riders’ times by about 20-30 seconds every mile compared to when they rode the same courses alone.

      Skepticism leads to truth. But also, here, he is going to break down other possible factors that might have led to the result he is attempting to search

    23. riding in competitive races appeared to improve riders’ times by about 20-30 seconds every mile compared to when they rode the same courses alone.

      Hypothesis, argument?

    1. Decades of research on social cognition and attitudes have revealed many of the “tricks” and “tools” we use to efficiently process the limitless amounts of social information we encounter.

      This is so much active work that the brain and personality does...

    2. Individuals’ implicit attitudes are sometimes inconsistent with their explicitly held attitudes

      They, in a way, build up the explicit ones

    3. they might not want to admit to them, such as when holding a certain attitude is viewed negatively by their culture. For example, sometimes it can be difficult to measure people’s true opinions on racial issues, because participants fear that expressing their true attitudes will be viewed as socially unacceptable.

      Great elaboration on previous point!

    4. ndividuals aren’t always aware of their true attitudes, because they’re either undecided or haven’t given a particular issue much thought.

      and are in denial sometimes!

    5. . For example, a negative attitude toward mushrooms would predispose you to avoid them and think negatively of them in other ways. This bias can be long- or short-term and can be overridden by another experience with the object. Thus, if you encounter a delicious mushroom dish in the future, your negative attitude could change to a positive one.

      I have always thought of this in relation to subjects and not objects!

    6. An attitude is a “psychological tendency that is expressed by evaluating a particular entity with some degree of favor or disfavor” (Eagly & Chaiken, 1993, p. 1). In essence, our attitudes are our general evaluations of things

      first impression in short!

    7. We will discuss the consequences of both consciously and unconsciously held attitudes in the next section.

      I would like to pursue research on this exact point!

    8. A behavior or process is considered automatic if it is unintentional, uncontrollable, occurs outside of conscious awareness, or is cognitively efficient (Bargh & Chartrand, 1999). A process may be considered automatic even if it does not have all these features; for example, driving is a fairly automatic process, but is clearly intentional. Processes can become automatic through repetition, practice, or repeated associations.

      Isn't it that most of our decisions are automatic? I am confused!

    9. In summary, our mood and motivations can influence both the way we think and the decisions we ultimately make.

      In summary, we decide and think differently based on our moods

    10. However, this occurred only if the participants were not aware that the weather might be influencing their mood. In essence, participants were in worse moods on rainy days than sunny days, and, if unaware of the weather’s effect on their mood, they incorrectly used their mood as evidence of their overall life satisfaction.

      due to the social talk about cold weather and the connotation it has with it

    11. Imagine trying to choose a restaurant with a group of friends when you’re really hungry. You may choose whatever’s nearby without caring if the restaurant is the best or not

      Importance vary depending on emergency

    12. In this situation, your ability to reason objectively about the quality of your assignment may be limited by your anger toward the teacher, upset feelings over the bad grade, and your motivation to maintain your belief that you are a good student. I

      This happens a lot when we don't understand our parents' actions that might seem negative for us but are actually for our best

    13. However, these judgments are shaped by our tendency to view ourselves in an overly positive light and our inability to appreciate our habituation to both positive and negative events.

      is this our natural coping mechanism?

    14. Another factor in these estimations is the durability bias. The durability bias refers to the tendency for people to overestimate how long (or, the duration) positive and negative events will affect them.

      This usually happens with acceptance decisions to programs that you've dreamt of.

    15. the impact bias : the tendency for a person to overestimate the intensity of their future feelings

      relates to the point i mentioned earlier

    16. For example, we tend to underestimate how much time it will take us to complete a task, whether it is writing a paper, finishing a project at work, or building a bridge—a phenomenon known as the planning fallacy

      In addition, the way we predict our actions' impact on others' feelings and emotions.

    17. As might be expected, the more information there is available, the more accurate many of these judgments become (Carney, Colvin, & Hall, 2007).

      how different are predictions from prejudice?

    18. If you have a paper due in a week and have the option of going out to a party or working on the paper, the decision of what to do rests on a few things: the amount of time you predict you will need to write the paper, your prediction of how you will feel if you do poorly on the paper, and your prediction of how harshly the professor will grade it. 

      the examples can go from this simple to pretty complex existential cases

    19. Whenever we face a decision, we predict our future behaviors or feelings in order to choose the best course of action. I

      we take posteriori decisions

    20. individuals’ ability to accurately predict others’ behaviors, as well as their own future thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, and how these predictions can impact their decisions.

      I am highly interested in exploring the part about one's identity

    21. People use the availability heuristic to evaluate the frequency or likelihood of an event based on how easily instances of it come to mind (Tversky & Kahneman, 1973). Because more commonly occurring events are more likely to be cognitively accessible (or, they come to mind more easily), use of the availability heuristic can lead to relatively good approximations of frequency. H

      This is common in political and sociological analysis of multiple cases out there in the world

    22. Therefore, although the man fits the mental image of a professor, the actual probability of him being one (considering the number of professors out there) is lower than that of being a truck driver.

      How static can such data be? This limits aspects of those who do not comply to the usual profiles of their identities.

    23. However, when base-rate information (e.g., the actual percentage of athletes in the area and therefore the probability that this person actually is an athlete) conflicts with representativeness information, use of this heuristic is less appropriate.

      objective quantitative data always backs up expertise level.

    24. In many situations, an object’s similarity to a category is a good indicator of its membership in that category, and an individual using the representativeness heuristic will arrive at a correct judgment

      experience hugely influences the way we perceive society

    25. A script for dining at a restaurant would indicate that one should wait to be seated by the host or hostess, that food should be ordered from a menu, and that one is expected to pay the check at the end of the meal. Because the majority of dining situations conform to this general format, most diners just need to follow their mental scripts to know what to expect and how they should behave, greatly reducing their cognitive workload.

      its interesting to think of the cultural differences that might come up in this situation. And how this affects the schemes of people who are foreigner to our cultures

    26. individual people (person schemas), ourselves (self-schemas), and recurring events (event schemas, or scripts)

      Is this how the subconscious categorizes its information?

    27. dying in a plane crash is extremely rare, but people often overestimate the probability of it occurring because plane crashes tend to be highly memorable and publicized.

      I personally panic about this but i figured i was wrong when i checked the data for my airplane type

    28. Therefore, although the man fits the mental image of a professor, the actual probability of him being one (considering the number of professors out there) is lower than that of being a truck driver.

      Judging off our regular perceptions can be wrongful if the judgment is based on a non-factual basis

    29. . Rather than engaging in an in-depth consideration of the object’s attributes, one can simply judge the likelihood of the object belonging to a category, based on how similar it is to one’s mental representation of that category.

      This can unfortunately be taken to extreme situation where racial conflicts and stereotypes arise

    30. Because the majority of dining situations conform to this general format, most diners just need to follow their mental scripts to know what to expect and how they should behave, greatly reducing their cognitive workload.

      does this hinder them from being awake or conscious to observe other existing non-schemes?

    31. greatly reduce the amount of cognitive work we need to do and allow us to “go beyond the information given”

      cognitive work that we need to do is just to document and associate, rather than comparison and analysis.

    32. A schema is a mental model, or representation, of any of the various things we come across in our daily lives. A schema (related to the word schematic) is kind of like a mental blueprint for how we expect something to be or behave.

      this reminds me of the fact that when I speak of something, the picture of that thing always comes up to my mind, and sometimes also sounds or smells or feelings.

    33. How do we simplify all this information to attend to what is important and make decisions quickly and efficiently?

      It is fascinating that we actually take everything in and not realize it.

    34. The area of social psychology that focuses on how people think about others and about the social world is called social cognition.

      Can another word be social understanding, social knowledge?

    35. What would you make of this scene? What story might you tell yourself to help explain this interesting and unusual behavior?

      I personally would not interpret it in any way because I know I do not have enough information. However, I know many people who would think this is a discussion about the student's attitude

    1. Psychological research shows that when people are placed in front of mirrors they often behave in a more moral and conscientious manner, even though they sometimes experience this procedure as unpleasant. From the standpoint of the self as a social actor, how might we explain this phenomenon?

      This is because they are reminded of the chance that someone is observing their actions at that moment, so they will have to act in a conventional, agreed upon way. But also the fact that they see themselves acting without in a immoral way would make them feel embarrassed because they don't want someone else to act that way to them or in front of them anyway

    2. For human beings, selves begin as social actors, but they eventually become motivated agents and autobiographical authors, too. The I first sees itself as an embodied actor in social space; with development, however, it comes to appreciate itself also as a forward-looking source of self-determined goals and values, and later yet, as a storyteller of personal experience, oriented to the reconstructed past and the imagined future. To “know thyself” in mature adulthood, then, is to do three things: (a) to apprehend and to perform with social approval my self-ascribed traits and roles, (b) to pursue with vigor and (ideally) success my most valued goals and plans, and (c) to construct a story about life that conveys, with vividness and cultural resonance, how I became the person I am becoming, integrating my past as I remember it, my present as I am experiencing it, and my future as I hope it to be.

      I believe that these three aspects of identity, although are valid, do not happen in chronological order but rather they are dependent on context and situation.

    3. As such, life stories reflect the culture, wherein they are situated as much as they reflect the authorial efforts of the autobiographical I.

      this relates to discourse about identity

    4. But it is not until adolescence, research shows, that human beings express advanced storytelling skills and what psychologists call autobiographical reasoning

      especially because they are able to relate events in life in a more reasonable way

    5. By making them our own, we maneuver ourselves into the inner position of proprietors, of creators."

      Is this the case for all people? Especially with those who have traumas from their childhood

    6. It also involves achieving a sense of temporal continuity in life—a reflexive understanding of how I have come to be the person I am becoming, or put differently, how my past self has developed into my present self, and how my present self will, in turn, develop into an envisioned future self.

      as we grow older we tend to become more rationally and reflexively driven.

    7. A great deal of the identity work we do in adolescence and young adulthood is about values and goals, as we strive to articulate a personal vision or dream for what we hope to accomplish in the future.

      that is the age of building up your personality. I am assuming that the autobiographical author point will speak about a later stage in age.

    8. Committing oneself to an integrated suite of life goals and values is perhaps the greatest achievement for the self as motivated agentSelf as motivated agentThe sense of the self as an intentional force that strives to achieve goals, plans, values, projects, and the like..

      at this point, you are actively making a decision which will b translated into actions later on.

    9. demands on students to work hard, adhere to schedules, focus on goals, and achieve success in particular, well-defined task domains.

      Is this competitive notion, which grows in children in result to this, healthy on the long term?

    10. Theory and research on what developmental psychologists call the age 5-to-7 shift

      I wonder how this applies to children who are not in the same context (education I am assuming)

    11. In order to do so, the person must first realize that people indeed have desires and goals in their minds and that these inner desires and goals motivate (initiate, energize, put into motion) their behavior.

      Reminds me of Kant's moral philosophy in his book "Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals"

    12. observing and imitating the goal-directed, intentional behavior of others, rather than random behaviors

      Although they are building their outer self based on inner motives, the inner motives are still inspired by outer factors. This is an interesting chicken egg relationship!

    13. To be an agent is to act with direction and purpose, to move forward into the future in pursuit of self-chosen and valued goals

      The term agent has a purposive connotation to it.There is an active aspect of this word that might be explained, in this context, by active thinking, reflecting, and analyzing.

    14. motivated agent.

      I am starting to understand that the inner self (ME) is going to be analyzed as a the driver for the outer self to exist. As in, the backstage explanations for the way a certain actor acts on stage.

    15. observers can never fully know what is in the actor’s head, no matter how closely they watch.

      The only access point to this information is personal reflection?

    16. Whether we are talking literally about the theatrical stage or more figuratively

      I wonder if we can take the discourse about the stage any further in our analysis to talk about authenticity and originality of personalities.

    17. , you may begin to see yourself in a new light, and others will notice the change, too.

      isn't it the other way around? The fact that you will do your actions, and then have others react to it, only then your perception of yourself will change.

    18. In the language of traits, you have decided to “work on” your “neuroticism

      how you reflect on your self, building on what others perceive you and your relationship to them

    19. Erikson (1963) argued that experiences of trust and interpersonal attachment in the first year of life help to consolidate the autonomy of the ego in the second.

      the impact of social interactions on the way the I is constructed

    20. Around the same time, children also begin to express social emotions such as embarrassment, shame, guilt, and pride

      they perceive themselves based on how others judge them. They evaluate, define, and communicate to themselves based on their external and social interactions

    21. suggesting that the I now has linguistic labels that can be applied reflexively to itself: I call myself “me.”

      notion of self and property happens early especially with recognizing "your" mother, "your" game...

    22. the sense of the self as a social actor begins to emerge around the age of 18 months.

      my latest annotation does not apply to this situation I guess...

    23. "I" should apprehend the "Me"

      The consciousness should apprehend the sub-con as a social actor? Because I usually is a subject that takes action, and in the context of reflection, that would be the consciousness who is doing the action of thinking back and analyzing its sub-conscious actions. Here, it could understand its actions as a social actor in principal.

    24. unfortunate individuals who do not get along well in social groups or who fail to attain a requisite status among their peers have typically been severely compromised when it comes to survival and reproduction.

      much deeper concepts can arise in relation to this. Such as ethics, social recognition, right and wrong, conformity...

    25. Homo sapiens and their evolutionary forerunners have survived and flourished by virtue of their ability to live and work together in complex social groups

      the gift of language as a means of communication

    26. the manner in which we perform our roles as actors in the everyday theatre of social life.

      Also reminds me of Artistotle's "humans are civic animals" and Ibn Khaldoun's observation of societies.

    27. n a way that you hope will bring you more happiness, fulfillment, peace, or excitement.

      is this the purpose of understanding the self? is understanding the self necessary for this to happen?

    28. he self is what happens when “I” reflects back upon “Me.”

      after a long year, you sit down and think about how your outer image looked in relation to your internal values and goals

    29. The ancient Greeks seemed to realize that the self is inherently reflexive—it reflects back on itself.

      our thought process in itself is usually a reflective talk back to the self

    30. Describe the development of the self’s sense of motivated agency from the emergence of the child’s theory of mind to the articulation of life goals and values in adolescence and beyond.

      Growth in age = growth in perception = growth in personality = growth in self

    31. Describe how a sense of self as a social actor emerges around the age of 2 years and how it develops going forward.

      starting to see the evolution / development of the aspects of the self

    32. autobiographical author

      a combination of both - this is because this aspect takes former, present, and future experiences that include both inner and outer interactions. Is this what the author is trying to say though?

    33. How does a person apprehend and understand who he or she is?

      If I had to assume before reading the article, I would say that that's done through conclusions drawn from the way one perceives themselves and the way others perceive them. I relate this to a study of James Jee Paul on identity and its different aspects.