43 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2017
    1. Dependency theory states that as long as peripheral nations are dependent on core nations for economic stimulus and access to a larger piece of the global economy, they will never achieve stable and consistent economic growth. Further, the theory states that since core nations, as well as the World Bank, choose which countries to make loans to, and for what they will loan funds, they are creating highly segmented labour markets that are built to benefit the dominant market countries

      To this statement I would to bring examples of Asian tigers such as Japan, S.Korea and other South Asian countries. These countries were able to become developed during short period (40-50 years) despite conditions described in the Dependency Theory section.

    2. In the period of colonialism, core or metropolis nations created the conditions for the underdevelopment of peripheral or hinterland nations through a metropolis-hinterland relationship. The resources of the hinterlands were shipped to the metropolises where they were converted into manufactured goods and shipped back for consumption in the hinterlands. The hinterlands were used as the source of cheap resources and were unable to develop competitive manufacturing sectors of their own.

      However, these conditions created back in the colonialism period by western civilization are not something unchangeable. Every developing country has opportunity to become developed if they are able to handle corruption and create favorable conditions for an entrepreneurship and so on.

    3. Dependency theory was created in part as a response to the Western-centric mindset of modernization theory. It states that global inequality is primarily caused by core nations (or high-income nations) exploiting semi-peripheral and peripheral nations (or middle-income and low-income nations), creating a cycle of dependence (Hendricks 2010).

      I agree with this statement of Hendricks too. For me it is obvious. It is not blaming of rich nations, and, definitely, it is not blaming of poor countries, but the reality of these days. However, as I was saying above: what is obvious for me, not necessarily so for others.

    4. Critics point out the inherent ethnocentric bias of this theory. It supposes all countries have the same resources and are capable of following the same path. In addition, it assumes that the goal of all countries is to be as “developed” as possible (i.e., like the model of capitalist democracies provided by Canada or the United States). There is no room within this theory for the possibility that industrialization and technology are not the best goals.

      I would agree with this critic of the two perspectives on global stratification because it is obvious that world, regions and countries are different from each other. Regions, countries and nations within them have different cultures, religious, languages, etc. and because of these have different perception on different aspects of their lives. I think I am a man of idea that what is good for one nation or country might be wrong for another nation or country.

  2. Mar 2017
    1. We're a complicated species--both moral and immoral as our environment and physiology dictate. But, mostly the moral dominates. Not so bad for a complicated big-brained mammal.

      Maybe!!!

    2. The exceptions to this rule are the five percent of the population who I've found do not have an oxytocin response and are pathologically selfish like Madoff, and another few percent who are nearly pathologically virtuous like Mother Teresa. The rest of us vacillate between good and evil.

      Still, the idea of the article seems to me controversial because that brain's response to the environment is not proved 100%!

    3. This research has largely confirmed Smith's argument for why humans can be virtuous. We have shown that virtuous behaviors are caused by the brain's release of the neurotransmitter and hormone oxytocin. When oxytocin is high, costly caring and helping behaviors follow. When we inhibit oxytocin release (for example, in experiments where I've administered testosterone to volunteers), virtue wanes and selfishness dominates. Oxytocin release makes us feel empathy and by doing so increases our sensitivity to the feelings of those around us. I recently published an article reviewing these findings (link is external). 

      Who could imagine this?! It is amazing and, at the same time, probably controversial.

    4. he biological answer is that we have evolved behaviors that increase our chances of survival and reproduction

      This is very interesting! So, this means that there are no bad or good people, and all that moral and amoral staff is about our biology. This can justify some of my bad actions then. I am happy to realize that I am not a bad person; however, it is sad to realize from this article that I am not a good person either.

    5. All of us recognize virtue and vice when we see it, with virtues generally being actions that benefit others and vices entailing selfish acts. The moral philosopher Adam Smith (also the "father" of economics) argued in his 1759 book The Theory of Moral Sentiments that virtue derives from our innately social nature in which we cannot help but share in the joy and pain of those around us. Smith argued that when we do things that cause others pain, we also feel pain. Because our biology causes us to avoid pain, we typically avoid such actions. Similarly, we enjoy pleasure and vicariously experience pleasure when we do something that brings happiness to others. This "fellow-feeling," or what we would now call empathy, is what maintains us in the community of humans. This is a critical requirement for a social creature. Smith was the first to clearly make the case that it is our social nature that motivates human virtue and is the reason why we vilify vice.

      I really could feel this always. When I did something bad to other people I also felt bad, but when I did something good and kind to others I felt like I am almighty because of people's good feelings.

  3. Feb 2017
    1. 21. The “American Dream”—the notion that anybody can be successful and rich if they work hard enough—is most commonly associated with which sociological theory?

      c

    2. 19. The Occupy Wall Street movement of 2011 grew to be an international movement. Supporters believe that the economic disparity between the highest economic class and the mid to lower economic classes is growing at an exponentially alarming rate. A sociologist who studies that movement by examining the interactions between members at Occupy camps would most likely use what theoretical approach?

      a

    3. 18. A sociologist conducts research into the ways that Hispanic American students are historically underprivileged in the American education system. What theoretical approach is the sociologist using?

      c

    4. 15. Some jobs today advertise in multinational markets and permit telecommuting in lieu of working from a primary location. This broadening of the job market and the way that jobs are performed can be attributed to:

      d

    5. 14. Your 83-year-old grandmother has been using a computer for some time now. As a way to keep in touch, you frequently send emails of a few lines to let her know about your day. She calls after every email to respond point by point, but she has never emailed a response back. This can be viewed as an example of:

      a

    6. 7. The existence of social norms, both formal and informal, is one of the main things that inform ___________, otherwise known as a way to encourage social conformity.

      d

    7. 5. Most cultures have been found to identify laughter as a sign of humour, joy, or pleasure. Likewise, most cultures recognize music in some form. Music and laughter are examples of:

      d

    8. 4. Rodney and Elise are American students studying abroad in Italy. When they are introduced to their host families, the families kiss them on both cheeks. When Rodney’s host brother introduces himself and kisses Rodney on both cheeks, Rodney pulls back in surprise. Where he is from, unless they are romantically involved, men do not kiss one another. This is an example of:

      a

    9. 2. The American flag is a material object that denotes the United States of America; however, there are certain connotations that many associate with the flag, like bravery and freedom. In this example, what are bravery and freedom?

      d

    10. A thumbs-up, for example, indicates positive reinforcement in Canada, whereas in Russia and Australia, it is an offensive curse (Passero 2002)

      It is not true! At least with Russia.

    11. complain about the unsafe driving habits of Italians compared to people in the United States. It helps to remember that culture is learned. Everyone is ethnocentric to an extent, and identifying with one’s own country is natural.

      And when it comes to the safety matters such as lives and health, I do not think that it is ethnocentrism of someone.

    12. complain about the unsafe driving habits of Italians

      But unsafe driving is unsafe for people, therefore, it is not a good thing, right? Someone might say that it is a part of culture, but it threatens people's lives. I believe that all, even cultural, habits threatening to others safety should not be considered very simplified and as a just cultural difference.

    13. However, indiscriminately embracing everything about a new culture is not always possible. Even the most culturally relativist people from egalitarian societies—ones in which women have political rights and control over their own bodies—would question whether the widespread practice of female genital mutilation in countries such as Ethiopia and Sudan should be accepted as a part of cultural tradition.

      As I aforementioned, in my second comment, this concerns me very much!

    14. Ethnocentrism can be so strong that when confronted with all the differences of a new culture, one may experience disorientation and frustration. In sociology, we call this “culture shock.” A traveller from Chicago might find the nightly silence of rural Montana unsettling, not peaceful. An exchange student from China might be annoyed by the constant interruptions in class as other students ask questions—a practice that is considered rude in China. Perhaps the Chicago traveller was initially captivated with Montana’s quiet beauty and the Chinese student was originally excited to see an American-style classroom firsthand. But as they experience unanticipated differences from their own culture, their excitement gives way to discomfort and doubts about how to behave appropriately in the new situation. Eventually, as people learn more about a culture, they recover from culture shock.

      I am not sure that I understand the author's point in this paragraph. Is he saying that even person likes a new culture it is still culture shock? If so, I did not know that!

    15. Almost everyone is a little bit ethnocentric.

      Everyone is a little bit ethnocentric, a little bit egocentric, a little bit haughty, a little bit greedy, a little bit amoral, a little bit impatient, a little bit ... I think all people have a little bit of everything in them, including all positive human qualities.

    16. Canadians often express disgust at other cultures’ cuisine, thinking it is gross to eat meat from a dog or guinea pig, for example, while they do not question their own habit of eating cows or pigs. Such attitudes are an example of ethnocentrism, or evaluating and judging another culture based on how it compares to one’s own cultural norms

      I think, this is how most of human beings react and live their lives! It is really difficult to be non judgemental. Even the best of us are not without vices.

    17. In 2009, a team of psychologists, led by Thomas Fritz of the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in Leipzig, Germany, studied people’s reactions to music they’d never heard (Fritz et al. 2009). The research team travelled to Cameroon, Africa, and asked Mafa tribal members to listen to Western music. The tribe, isolated from Western culture, had never been exposed to Western culture and had no context or experience within which to interpret its music. Even so, as the tribal members listened to a Western piano piece, they were able to recognize three basic emotions: happiness, sadness, and fear. Music, it turns out, is a sort of universal language.

      I did not know this. Wow, it is very interesting finding!

    18. Sociologists consider humour necessary to human interaction because it helps individuals navigate otherwise tense situations.

      This is very true! I could not say better! :)

    19. Often, a comparison of one culture to another will reveal obvious differences. But all cultures share common elements. Cultural universals are patterns or traits that are globally common to all societies. One example of a cultural universal is the family unit: every human society recognizes a family structure that regulates sexual reproduction and the care of children. Even so, how that family unit is defined and how it functions vary. In many Asian cultures, for example, family members from all generations commonly live together in one household. In these cultures, young adults will continue to live in the extended household family structure until they marry and join their spouse’s household, or they may remain and raise their nuclear family within the extended family’s homestead. In Canada, by contrast, individuals are expected to leave home and live independently for a period before forming a family unit consisting of parents and their offspring.

      I remember when I heard for a first time about western culture of leaving parents' house around 18 to live alone, it was wild for me. It was odd for me that parents do not help their children with money and housing. In our culture, parents must provide children with education, housing, job, car, and marriage expenses. However, these days I believe that letting children live on their own is one of the best ways to help them to become mature and prepared for their future lives.

    20. Take the case of going to work on public transportation. Whether commuting in Dublin, Cairo, Mumbai, or Vancouver, many behaviours will be the same in all locations, but significant differences also arise between cultures. Typically, a passenger would find a marked bus stop or station, wait for the bus or train, pay an agent before or after boarding, and quietly take a seat if one is available. But when boarding a bus in Cairo, passengers might have to run, because buses there often do not come to a full stop to take on patrons. Dublin bus riders would be expected to extend an arm to indicate that they want the bus to stop for them. And when boarding a commuter train in Mumbai, passengers must squeeze into overstuffed cars amid a lot of pushing and shoving on the crowded platforms. That kind of behaviour would be considered the height of rudeness in Canada, but in Mumbai it reflects the daily challenges of getting around on a train system that is taxed to capacity.

      This is very interesting to know about different countries' way to get on a bus! For example, in Kazakhstan there is now culture or rule of standing in a line to get on a bus. When the bus comes, people are chaotically trying to get on the bus first. As a result, sometimes people fight.

    21. Almost every human behaviour, from shopping to marriage to expressions of feelings, is learned. In Canada, people tend to view marriage as a choice between two people, based on mutual feelings of love. In other nations and in other times, marriages have been arranged through an intricate process of interviews and negotiations between entire families, or in other cases, through a direct system such as a “mail order bride.” To someone raised in Winnipeg, the marriage customs of a family from Nigeria may seem strange, or even wrong. Conversely, someone from a traditional Kolkata family might be perplexed with the idea of romantic love as the foundation for the lifelong commitment of marriage. In other words, the way in which people view marriage depends largely on what they have been taught.

      I agree with this paragraph partly. Yes, it is true that every community, country or nation has its own cultural traditions and beliefs; and they should be respected. When we are talking about harmless different marriage traditions, I think, we can apply the philosophy of this paragraph. However, what about cruel and life threatening cultural traditions existing across the world, they are taught or not!