- Oct 2024
-
social-media-ethics-automation.github.io social-media-ethics-automation.github.io
-
Data collection and storage can go wrong in other ways as well, with incorrect or erroneous options. Here are some screenshots from a thread of people collecting strange gender selection forms:
Data collection practices should prioritize inclusivity and respect for diverse gender identities. It's crucial to offer comprehensive and sensitive options that accurately represent the full spectrum of gender expressions. Thoughtful design of gender selection forms not only improves data accuracy but also demonstrates respect for all individuals, fostering a more inclusive environment.
-
-
social-media-ethics-automation.github.io social-media-ethics-automation.github.io
-
Fig. 4.5 The number of replies, retweets, and likes can be represented as integer numbers (197.8K can be stored as a whole number like 197,800).
The number of likes and comments on social media posts can provide valuable insights into user engagement and content popularity. These metrics often serve as indicators of a post's reach and impact, reflecting how well the content resonates with the audience However, it's important to note that while these numbers can be easily quantified (for example, 197,800 likes), their true meaning goes beyond mere statistics. They represent real people interacting with and responding to the content, potentially influencing opinions and sparking conversations
-
-
social-media-ethics-automation.github.io social-media-ethics-automation.github.io
-
A human computer running a cooking program. In other words: “someone following a recipe” (but probably not a dumpling recipe)
This analogy can be a useful tool for introducing programming concepts to beginners, making the abstract world of coding more relatable through the familiar context of cooking. It also highlights how computational thinking can be applied to everyday tasks, demonstrating the ubiquity of algorithmic processes in our daily lives.
-
-
social-media-ethics-automation.github.io social-media-ethics-automation.github.io
-
Fig. 3.1 A photo that is likely from a click-farm, where a human computer is paid to do actions through multiple accounts, such as like a post or rate an app. For our purposes here, we consider this a type of automation, but we are not considering this a “bot,” since it is not using (electrical) computer programming.# { requestKernel: true, binderOptions: { repo: "binder-examples/jupyter-stacks-datascience", ref: "master", }, codeMirrorConfig: { theme: "abcdef", mode: "python" }, kernelOptions: { kernelName: "python3", path: "./ch03_bots" }, predefinedOutput: true } kernelName = 'python3'
It raises important questions about the authenticity of online engagement and the ethical implications of such practices. As we consider this a form of automation, despite the human involvement, it challenges our understanding of what constitutes a "bot" in the digital age.
-