This is an interesting perspective that people feel as though gayness is something that does not improve upon the world. Like there is no benefit to being gay in the sense fo productivity as comapred to other identies and cultures
. I think this also attributes to what we were talking about in the context of Darwinism in the sense of how they technically don't contribute to it because they are not producing any children.
Would this be the justifcation for why so many homosexual men married women because at least they could contrubute to society, while also reciving an heir to pass on all of their wealth to the next generation. Was their a sense of duty and fufillment that came with it, even if they were not sexually attracted to their wives. This also reminds me of how gay men sought purpsoe through learning about the world like the Greeks, as they did not identify with these terms and were just guys who casually enaged in sexual activites with men.