3 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2026
    1. One cannot, therefore, easily adjust the amount of these inputs available to the land owned. Instead,individuals nd it easier to adjust the size of land cultivated to these inputs through tenancy contracts.

      This extract highlights the idea that tenancy contracts act as an adjustment mechanism in a context of imperfect markets. The argument assumes that households respond mainly to economic constraints, especially labour availability. However, this explanation may be incomplete, as it underplays the role of social norms, caste relations, and power asymmetries in shaping access to land and contracts. Tenancy choices may therefore reflect social constraints as much as economic rationality. To what extent can tenancy contracts be explained by market imperfections alone, rather than by social and institutional factors?

    2. One cannot, therefore, easily adjust the amount of these inputs available to the land owned. Instead,individuals nd it easier to adjust the size of land cultivated to these inputs through tenancy contracts.

      This extract highlights the idea that tenancy contracts act as an adjustment mechanism in a context of imperfect markets. The argument assumes that households respond mainly to economic constraints, especially labour availability. However, this explanation may be incomplete, as it underplays the role of social norms, caste relations, and power asymmetries in shaping access to land and contracts. Tenancy choices may therefore reflect social constraints as much as economic rationality. To what extent can tenancy contracts be explained by market imperfections alone, rather than by social and institutional factors?

    1. The evolution of agriculture in Palanpur involvedand was shaped by the interactions amongst several factors, including demographic change, expansion ofirrigation, intensication of cultivation, changing cropping patterns, farm mechanization, growing non-farmemployment, ‘marketization’ of factors of production, and improvements in formal credit supply.We identify ve fundamental elements of the change in agriculture in Palanpur. First, growing populationpressure and sale of land have meant that per capita land owned and land operated have declined signicantlybetween 1983 and 2008–10. While the decline in land availability per capita has inuenced changing patternsof tenancy, it has also affected choice of crops and cropping intensity. Second, while agricultural output, and tosome extent outside jobs, played a central role in income growth in earlier surveys, growing non-farm andoutside jobs have become more important in recent periods. The decline in the role of agriculture hasimplications not just for income distribution and inequality in the village but also for the labour and landmarkets. Third, we look at the role of agriculture in relation to social and cultural aspects of the village,particularly the afnity of some of the caste groups in relation to agriculture

      This passage highlights that long-run development operates through cumulative and interdependent processes rather than through a simple sectoral reallocation of labour. The persistence of agricultural employment despite declining output shares suggests that agriculture continues to play a stabilizing and coordinating role in rural labour markets, influencing income diversification, tenancy relations, and investment decisions. Long-term data make visible these slow institutional and technological adjustments that are often missed in short-run analyses. Structural transformation in Palanpur therefore appears less as an exit from agriculture than as a gradual reorganization of its functions within a diversified rural economy. Does this imply that agriculture should be understood as a complement rather than a residual sector in long-run development?