53 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2020
    1. The inhabitants of Canada, Massachusetts, the middle provinces, the southern ones will be as different as their climates; their only points of unity will be those of religion and language.

      That still rings true today!

    2. they are a mixture of English, Scotch, Irish, French, Dutch, Germans, and Swedes. From this promiscuous breed, that race now called Americans have arisen

      Highlights America's immigrants at the time.

    3. It is not composed, as in Europe, of great lords who possess everything, and of a herd of people who have nothing. Here are no aristocratical families, no courts, no kings, no bishops, no ecclesiastical dominion, no invisible power giving to a few a very visible one; no great manufacturers employing thousands, no great refinements of luxury.

      The difference between UK and America is clear in his mind. It's new and exciting to him.

    1. But as the happiness of my family is the only object of my wishes, I care very little where we be, or where we go, provided that we are safe, and all united together.

      Put's family before country. That's sweet of him.

    2. Alas, she herself, that once indulgent parent, forces me to take up arms against her.

      He see's Britain in a new light because of his interactions with Americans?

    1. even weave some comedy and sass in there

      Of course! I honestly can't take myself too seriously when I'm writing an important topic. I think cracking a joke helps ease the tension and makes the conversation easier.

    2. highlighting important themes and ideas about all of these texts.

      Important themes and ideas of the story or important themes and ideas of society at the time? Or maybe both?

    3. future PSU English students will feel inspired to contribute

      The definition is always going to be different with each passing PSU student. I find that so interesting and pretty cool.

    4. We do not claim to have a “perfect” or “complete” representation of American literature.

      Yes! And that's perfectly fine! It would be nearly impossible to claim such a thing.

    5. This anthology tries to unpack

      i'm not so sure how far you can unpack American literature. It doesn't have one specific box and it seems to break all the traditional rules.

    6. However, this anthology takes things a step further because it makes connections between important works of American literature and contemporary culture

      This is important to do. It makes it easier for someone within my or the next generation to understand instead of using the expectations of a bygone societal norm.

    7. What is the difference between American literature and American history?

      That's an interesting aspect that we didn't talk about in this class. They might be paralleled or they might not.

    1. He bears the marks of the singeing to this day.

      When I first read this, I assumed the squirrel was grey. But now because of this explanation, I believe he was a read squirrel instead.

    2. The bear was too clumsy and growled too much, the elk was too tall and his antlers would strike against the lodge pole of the wigwam; the dog was not wise, and the serpent was never known to do good to the Cahrocs or to any man

      Interesting that they thought this out. Normally, bears would mean courage or elk would be sophistication.

  2. Aug 2019
    1. “strategic essentialism” in which one can speak in rather simplified forms of group identity for the purposes of struggle while debating within the group the finer shades of difference.

      Definition?

    2. A good deal of postcolonial debate has to do with rival claims to victimhood, with each side claiming the sympathies of right-thinking people because of their past sufferings.

      One country is often inflicting the other country.

    3. Postcolonial criticism could be compared to the tendency of Hollywood films set in such countries to focus on the problems of Americans and Europeans within those societies while marginalizing the views of their native peoples.

      Good example.

    4. it can be argued that this way of defining a whole era is Eurocentric, that it singles out the colonial experience as the most important fact about the countries involved.

      It excludes the US in that equation then?

    5. some critics argue that the term misleadingly implies that colonialism is over

      They have a point. Colonialism doesn't stop at just physically taking over another's country.

  3. Apr 2019
    1. the more we understand our connection to each and every life-form, the stranger they become to us.

      The more we understand, the more we begin to question it.

    2. We must see the whole picture; the good, bad and the ugly.

      Well said. It makes it easier for readers like me to understand the difference between regular and dark ecology.

    1. The Indian culture is overshadowed by a capitalist enterprise, and thus yoga begins to reflect Western values.

      It makes me wonder what it was like before Western values changed it and how it's viewed in India today.

    1. These Ideological State Apparatuses allow for the ideologies to continue to operate, unmanned, in society as a functioning machine.

      So basically without these ideologies, there would be no sense of order in a way? Do ideologies work the same way as laws work?

  4. Feb 2019
    1. the danger of sexism, homophobia, racism, and classism not just on the part of men, but of other women

      It isn't just one side to blame. It can be found within.

    2. to believe that all women fall under the same umbrella of oppression is not just false, it is perpetuating the oppression that is not experienced by the more dominant women

      This is so important to understand, and sadly people just don't get it.

    1. the expectation was that the woman would be grateful, or coquettish in some way or another.

      This is sadly very true. We're expected to be polite when we're complemented

    1. “Only the father’s intervention, separating mother from child, prevents incest,”

      So the Oedipus and the Electra complex wouldn't apply between Raimunda and her father

    2. leads to her marrying Paco, a man who reminds her of her deceased, abusive, horrible father

      This to me was repetition-compulsion. She went to a man who resembled her father.

    3. her loyalty lies with her father/Paco.

      Are they though? I believe she despised her father for what he did to her and she might have done the same thing to her father as Paula did to Paco.

    4. Could this be insinuating that Paula represents Raimunda as a child, and Raimunda is “going back” to her horrific childhood by witnessing Paula’s similar experience?

      Interesting theory. I never thought of it that way!