major claim

Semi face to face(video call) results in less stress then texting/emailing

within an argument essay how does one prevent losing trust in an opposing audience

The context is the foundation of the argument. An argument with no context is a novel with no plot.

The author's ability to identify and asses their intended audience is the "make for break" when if comes to having and reciprocated message and engaged audience. The audience also determines the author's vocabulary

An argumentative essay is when the author is trying to persuade the audience the think on their side or agree with them. Before reading the rest of the chapter I wonder what components differentiates persuasive and and rhetorical analysis? I think it's the intended audience.

Common cell shapes - coccus -bacillus -spriillium -vibrio

Are knowingness to be manipulated breaks the line of trust but I believe the author’s ability to manipulate the the audience unknowingly has the potential to strengthen their argument. This could be through the use of lying about credibility or sharing false facts both practices that are common on the internet

If a reader feel disrespected within an argument they will completely tune out of the information the author is trying to convey

This perspective reminds me a debate when students at HBCUs were explaining that they feel more comfortable with African American teachers. I believe they fear characterization within academic settings

Within fiction books authors are able to place readers into their world creating intimacy. I think this is why readers are so attached to character and the story it’s self

Ore personal question but what would our government look like is judges were to preside over a courtroom with a trustworthy and intimate demeanor? Maybe this is some thud a judge during mediation should practice?

I’ve been told death is one of the most common terms with multiple euphemisms. Euphemism can be deceptive and used to manipulated the tone and emotion to the authors intended message.

This relates to the statement I made about tone. Tone contributes to the readers interpretation and emotion.

In my opinion tone is one of the most valuable tools in the writing toolbox it contributes to the overall message of the text. If the author is unable to convey their intended tone the entire message would be construed

This is almost a more mature definition of educated guess or using background knowledge

Circular reasoning is a major contributor to redundant or ineffective argument.mi haven’t read on but I would like to know if there are anyways to prevent circular reasoning? Maybe stronger vocabulary?

There is a point of view is sociology that the language you spoke at birth determines you view if the world. Relating it to ambiguity, sometime there are places in the English language that uses different vocabulary. People from these different place may interpret arguments different due to language inconsistencies

Ambiguity is one of the first thing a reader check while criticizing a piece of text. Often we do it subconsciously while trying to understand what we are reading.