15 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2020
    1. The continuity of education for young children from 3 months to 6 years•A pedagogical-coordination-support team of pedagogisti andpsychologists•Participation by parents to infant/toddler centers and preschools forchildren with special needs•An atelier and an atelierista in each preschool and each infant/toddlercenter•Two teachers per classroom as co-teachers•Permanent collegial work and professional development in eachpreschool or infant toddler center for all teachers, atelieristi, cooks, andauxiliary personnel•Recognition of the value of the indoor and outdoor environments asspaces for learning, including kitchens, bathrooms, and outdoor spaces(Regulations for the Municipal Preschool, 1972, translation of p. 119)

      Wow! It seems like the Italian government actually listened to their educators about best practice for young children. We are way behind politically in education in the US but if Italy can do it maybe we can too?

    2. An atelierista from Anna Frank School wrote that with Malaguzzi, the teacher brought paper and painting materials into the center of the city and set up them up under the colonnade of the theater. The children set to painting out in the public for all to see, and people crowded around, expressed surprise, and asked many questions

      Wow how validating and empowering this must have been for the children! It makes me think about how I might be able to replicate something like this in my own classroom, but maybe in a different way?

    3. Therefore, schools have a new task: rather than child-minding they have to open up to observation, research and experimentation by teachers who, together with children, participate in constructing a new culture of education

      I love this notion that the education is ever evolving and that evolution should be done by teachers and students together.

  2. Mar 2020
    1. We must be able to be amazed and to enjoy, like the children often do.

      I love this statement! It reminded me of the other day when i had 2 students playing with magnets and happened to put them in the sand. Both the children and myself were so excited to see that the magnets were lifting up the dark grains of sand, but were leaving the lighter colored sand grain. I had never thought of doing this and was so eager to explore this new idea side-by-side with the children!

    2. Their goal is not so much to “facilitate” learning in the sense of “making smooth or easy” but rather to “stimulate” it by making problems more complex, involving, and arous-ing. They ask the children what they need to conduct experiments—even when they realize that a particular approach or hypothesis is not “correct.” They serve as the children’s partners, sustaining the children and offering assistance, resources, and strategies to get “relaunched” when they are stuck.

      I really love this idea of the role of the teacher. When I first read that teachers are to stimulate learning by making the problem more complex, I had to stop and reread it and really process what this was saying. I think that it's a really interesting way of thinking about it. We need to make the problem more interesting and important. As was stated earlier we act as their memory to help them sustain the work on problem solving.

  3. Feb 2020
    1. r adults to understand the languages that children may prefer, such as creative expression and play. Adults may have neglected and forgotten these languages in the course of growin

      This is so true. We can't expect children to be experts with something they have not had exposure to. Most preschools I think understand this, but as soon as they enter kindergarten this notion is lost.

    2. If children do indeed speak using 100 languages, then in order to understand what children are saying, adults must lis-ten with all of their creativity. Rinaldi (2001) proposed "listening not just with our ears but with all our senses (sight, touch, smell, taste, orientation). Listening to the hundred, the thousand languages

      This was such a profound statement that really made me stop and think about how I listen to kids. I think that naturally I "listen" mostly with my ears, and eyes, but I need to think outside the box to really understand each child's language.

    1. The teacher must have the capacity for many differ-ent roles. The teacher has to be the author of a play,someone who thinks ahead of time. Teachers alsoneed to be the main actors in the play, the protago-nists. The teacher must forget all the lines he knewbefore and invent the ones he doesn’t remember.Teachers also have to take the role of the prompter,the one who gives the cues to the actors. Teachersneed to be set designers who create the environmentin which activities take place. At the same time, theteacher needs to be the audience who applauds

      This is a beautiful picture of the teacher and one that I need to keep in sight as a reminder!

    2. The child wants to be observed, but she doesn’t wantto be judged.

      Wow! This is so true! Kids don´t want to be measured up to some standard, they just want us to care about their thoughts and discoveries!

    3. Overactivity on the part of the adult is a risk factor.The adult does too much because he cares about thechild; but this creates a passive role for the child inher own learning

      This statement hit home for me! I had a little girl in my class this week that showed an interest in making hair bows. I was fascinated by her interest but quickly jumped in and started offering up my suggestions, but she just politely said ¨actually I had another idea that I wanted to try¨ BAM! Reality check!

    4. All of this changes the role of the teacher, a role thatbecomes much more difficult and complex. It alsomakes the world of the teacher more beautiful,something to become involved in

      This is so true! How often do teachers burn out because we are trying to conform to society´s image of the teacher while simultaneously trying to fit our children into the cookie-cutter image of the child? Would we see the passion for teaching that we all experienced at the beginning of our careers be sustained? Would the ¨achievement gaps¨ our country is so focused on disappear? I think the answer is yes!

    5. There’s a difference between the environmentthat you are able to build based on a preconceivedimage of the child and the environment that you canbuild that is based on the child you see in front of you— the relationship you build with the child, thegames you play.

      Wow! This is a profound statement! The way we set up our environment can read that we value children´s instinct for relationship building, or it can read just the opposite. It can also read that the image we hold of children is one of natural curiosity and wonder, or that they can´t construct their own learning so let´s give them prescribed materials. This has really challenged me to look at my room and see if it shows the image of the child that I want to have.

  4. Jan 2020
    1. A strong image of the child has tocorrespond to a strong image of the teacher

      Love, Love, Love! I love that teachers are valued as experts and are supported. I also love that they are given ample time for collaboration and research.

    2. Parents are an essential component of the program; acompetent and active part of their children's learning experience. They are notconsidered consumers but co-responsible partners. Their right to participation isexpected and supported; it takes many forms, and can help ensure the welfare of allchildren in the program

      This is such an important component and one that I feel we don't do so well at in the U.S.; in the public school setting especially. We meet with parents 2 times a year to go over academic success. This parent component is something that I would really like to focus on in my classroom and see how I can better include my families as a partner. I really appreciated how the parents stayed at the school or helped with projects outside of the school (the plant container) in the video of the Diana School.

    3. Thirdly, the tradition of cooperative work is firmly rooted in the Emilia Romagnaregion and is based on a sense of community and of solidarity. Through a strongsense of solidarity, people there are accustomed to construct and maintain theconnections with the community.

      This philosophy of cooperative work and community is a bit foreign to the U.S. We are a country that is built on individualism and personal success. Our schools are built around that philosophy as well; tests measuring to see who is the best; who can out-perform who. It's really sad. This sense of community is truly one underlying foundation that sets the Reggio Emilia approach apart.