151 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2020
    1. In lieu of all sums of money or other annuities provided to be paid to the Indians herein named under any treaty or treaties heretofore made, the United States agrees to deliver at the agency house on the reservation herein named, on or before the first day of August of each year, for thirty years, the following articles, to wit:

      It's a great benefit for Indian boys and girls.

    2. In order to insure the civilization of the Indians entering into this treaty, the necessity of education is admitted, especially of such of them as are or may be settled on said agricultural reservations, and they, therefore, pledge themselves to compel their children, male and female, between the ages of six and sixteen years, to attend school, and it is hereby made the duty of the agent for said Indians to see that this stipulation is strictly complied with; and the United States agrees that for every thirty children between said ages, who can be induced or compelled to attend school, a house shall be provided, and a teacher competent to teach the elementary branches of an English education shall be furnished, who will reside among said Indians and faithfully discharge his or her duties as a teacher. The provisions of this article to continue for not less than twenty years.

      I think it's the most helpful one! Education is so important for all children!

    3. The President may, at any time, order a survey of the reservation, and, when so surveyed, Congress shall provide for protecting the rights of said settlers in their improvements, and may fix the character of the title held by each.

      Does it mean that the Indians reservation is still not independent?

    4. If it should appear from actual survey or other satisfactory examination of said tract of land that it contains less than 160 acres of tillable land for each person who, at the time, may be authorized to reside on it under the provisions of this treaty, and a very considerable number of such persons hsall be disposed to comence cultivating the soil as farmers, the United States agrees to set apart, for the use of said Indians, as herein provided, such additional quantity of arable land, adjoining to said reservation, or as near to the same as it can be obtained, as may be required to provide the necessary amount.

      so based on this, the land Americans' have is equal to Indians' have, right?

    5. From this day forward all war between the parties to this agreement shall for ever cease. The government of the United States desires peace, and its honor is hereby pledged to keep it. The Indians desire peace, and they now pledge their honor to maintain it.

      It's really helped to protect the women and children's lives.

    1. We will seek to restore fish and animal life to the area and to revitalize sea-life which has been threatened by the white man’s way.

      This is a good way to restore the ecology.

    2. Although some Navajos became rich, most Navajos benefited little from the power they were producing for other people. Navajo energy resources provided power for Albuquerque, Phoenix, Los Angeles, and other Southwestern cities, but many Navajo homes lacked running water or electricity. 

      There are rich and poor differences among many Navajos, with the poor occupying the majority.

    3. It is estimated that reservations contain one third of all low-sulphur coal in the western US, one-fifth of the country’s reserves of oil and natural gas, and more than half of the nation’s uranium deposits.

      Whoever has the resources will have the initiative in the negotiation.

    4. The US soldiers massacred between two and three hundred men, women, and children. Many of the wounded were left to die in subzero temperatures.

      When war comes, the most pitiful is the civilian.

    5. The movement itself was peaceful. However, non-Natives became alarmed by reports of warriors performing a strange new dance which would supposedly result in the disappearance of whites. Government agents working with the Lakota began to see the dance as a preparation for an uprising.

      Maybe this ghost dance leads to the next war, though they may be innocent.

    6. They refused to sell, and once again, war broke out among the Lakota and the US Army in early 1876, as the Army tried to force all Lakotas to relocate to the reservation. 

      Conflicts of interest always bring many wars and disasters.

    7. It banned Americans from entering Lakota land without permission, precluded any further land sales without agreement from three quarters of Lakota males, and recognized a massive stretch of the northern Great Plains as belonging to the Lakotas. 

      This is a manifestation of protecting one's rights.

    8. The government envisioned that once they were confined to isolated reservations, Native people could be taught to live in houses, become farmers, and speak, read, and write English. [1]

      This is to let them learn a new civilization and culture on the reserved land.

    1. who were afraid that, once outside of their full control, the new government would in some way harm the Mineral Estate.

      It is necessary to worry

    2. This his-tory also worked to instill in some Osage a sense that their headrights were personal property rather than an asset of the Nation, from which they received annuity checks

      This is brainwashing

    3. My grandfather—and more frequently my grandmother—often voiced disapproval of non-headright-owning Osage, who were “just trying to get our money.

      yes, what they want is just benefit

    4. The 1906 Osage Allotment Act created the Osage Mineral Estate as part of the unique deal struck between the Osage and the oIa, who wanted to open up Indian Country for white settlement and statehood. The surface of the Osage reservation was allotted, but the subsurface, including rights to oil, natural gas, and other minerals, was left under national control, to be distributed to those listed on the 1906 Osage roll.

      If you think of the mining Commission as a company, shareholders are the ones who have control over it.

    1. and since these facts have also been corroborated to us by a communication recently received by the commissioner from the Government of the United States and read and explained to the people in open council and therefore believ­ing said delegation can effect nothing and since our difficulties are daily increasing and our situation is rendered more and more precarious uncertain and insecure in consequence of the legislation of the States; and seeing no effectual way of relief, but in accepting the liberal over­tures of the United States.

      Accepting the American idea may help their economy develop to some extent.

    2. and with a view to reuniting their people in one body and securing a permanent home for themselves and their posterity in the country selected by their forefathers without the ter­ritorial limifa of the State sovereignties, and where they can establish and enjoy a government of their choice and perpetuate such a state of society as may be most consonant with their views, habits and condi­tion; and as may tend to their individual comfort and their advance­ment in civilization.

      In the face of irreconcilable cultural conflicts, separate governance and let them have their own system may be the best choice.

    1. Foxwoods Casino is immense, in addition to gaming space, it has 2,266 hotel rooms, restaurants, high-end shopping facilities, and conference space.

      Gaming space is a part but not all of it, so the economics is improving.

    2. However, many Seminoles associate casinos with new cultural opportunities. As tribal budgets have increased, so has tribal cultural programming. For example, Seminoles established a charter school in 2007 which offers instruction in Seminole language, culture, and history. The tribal museum records and archives oral histories, and there are sponsored reservation-wide activities which bring people together for sports tournaments, charity events, and celebrations

      I think it's a symbol of their development in economics and culture.

    3. Many states also use gambling to raise revenues—dating back to 1963, when New Hampshire legalized the state lottery

      yeah, it's could be a part of their total revenues

    4. The tribal gaming sector generates 45 percent of all gaming revenue in the US. According to an economic impact study conducted for the American Gaming Association, the tribal gaming industry provides 676,000 jobs, $36 billion in wages to employees, and $15 billion in taxes and revenue share payments to federal, state, and local governments.

      This really helped their economics a lot!

    5. Similarly, in 1977, a headline in Time magazine asked, “Should We Give the US Back to the Indians?” The article read:

      This title is really interesting, I think there would be many different comments on this topic.

    6. For example, Robert Burnette, president of the NCAI talked of Native families’ incomes as being one-third of the national average, reservation unemployment rates at 50%

      their living standard are lower than others

    7. urban unrest stemmed from a lack of opportunity that could be remedied by redirecting young people’s energy away from criminal activities and toward projects to enhance community life.

      people do not know what to do and they don't have anything to make living

  2. Nov 2020
    1. And all rules or regulations in said district, or in any other district of the nation, discriminating against the citizens of other districts, are prohibited, and shall be void.

      If only this rule had been in place earlier, many people would have been free from discrimination.

    2. The Cherokee Nation having, voluntarily, in February, eighteen hundred and sixty-three, by an act of the national council, forever abolished slavery, hereby covenant and agree that never hereafter shall either slavery or involuntary servitude exist in their nation otherwise than in the punishment of crime,

      It's a good news for them, many black people could live their own lives from now.

    1. nd so that’s when I filed a case for a woman named Bernice Riggs, who also had Cherokee blood, and the final ruling of the court was that she had Cherokee blood, but because her ancestors were on the Freedmen Roll she was excluded from enrollment.

      This is not a flexible statement

    2. because in the era in which that roll was made it was believed that African blood tainted you to a degree that your other blood didn’t count

      It shows that racial discrimination has been widespread since the early days

    3. it should be noted that many enslaved black people accompanied the Cherokee when the U.S. federal government forcibly removed the tribe from their tradi-tional homeland in what became North Carolina and Georgia in the 1830s.

      Black people were enslaved from the beginning because of their status, so they had to follow their employers all the time. It was very inhuman, but they could not do anything.

    1. The Bureau’s use of anthropometry was inaccurate and potentially destructive. Physical anthropologists defined a “race” as a group of individuals whose phenotypes varied around a set of well-defined physical characteristics that pervaded the group. They observed that different races possessed distinct physical features and believed that measuring those features elucidated the mental capacity and cultural advancement of each racial group. Thus, physical characteristics were tied to expectations about the intelligence and cultural abilities of people. 

      Yes, different measures make the division of different races different. There is something unfair about each definition, such as dividing race by a series of ways, such as intelligence and physical characteristics.

    2. Pamunkeys refused the label of “colored” and built segregated institutions for themselves, including churches and schools, born out of their need to define Native identity in this racially charged context. 

      Yes, it started with racial discrimination

    3. McKennon enrolled applicants whom he believed were half white and half Choctaw, but rejected those who appeared to have African American parentage, regardless of their claims to Choctaw ancestry.

      It's hard to get rid of this identity

    4. The simple definition of blood quantum is the amount of “Indian blood” an individual possesses. It is a fraction of blood that is derived going back to the original enrollees of a tribe who were counted on Census rolls.

      It's also a form of hierarchy, the way Indians are divided according to their blood quantum.

    5. Now Cherokee fought Cherokee. The war reduced their numbers from 22,000 to 15,000, more than a quarter of their people.

      They suffered heavy losses from civil war, and many innocent people were implicated.

    6. In 1860, they formed a secret Loyal League to promote Cherokee treaty rights, friendly relations with the United States, and the abolition of slavery. [5]

      The abolition of slavery is good news!

    7. They could not survive in close proximity to “civilized” Americans, and would die out if they remained uncivilized

      This may be a trend

    1. Their recent history is one of dark and bloody conflicts with the whites. To Americans, the phrase, •·Another redskin bit the dust." means a scene from a Western movie. To the Indian, it is the remembrance of something that happened to h is father and mother.

      It sounds so sad.

    2. The Indian Wars Cost More · ~ If the cost seems high (although it is pea-nuts compared to irrigation projects put in for farmers in California, Arizona and other states) remember this: Only 80 years ago, in a serie5 of running battles that we had with the Navahoa, Sioux and Cheyenne, the U . S. gov-ernment spent more than $100,000,000. It cost us that much money, and five years ot war-fare, to force the Indians back into the worth-le ss land they now occupy. Surely today, on a depreciated dollar, we should be able to afford $80,000,000 so that they can start making their own living

      Wars brought a huge cost for both countries, especially Indian.

    1. The United States may pass such laws on the sub3'ect of alienation and descent of property between the Indians and then· descendants as may be thought proper.

      The US government should support and approve such reasonable demands, because they have not affected others

    2. . , • • United States. t10n upon the person or property of any one, white, blac y' or Indian, subject to the authority of the United States and at peace therewith

      they should be treated the same level

    1. She recalled, “I was kind of sick then…and I didn’t know what I was signing.” The social worker then refused to return her now four-month-old son, as soon as she signed the papers. [30]

      That is so sad

    2. Moreover, placing Native children in non-Native homes was keeping in step with the overarching policy goals of the termination era: to terminate Native nations, and assimilate Native people solely as US citizens.

      I think it has both advantages and disadvantages

    3. Despite the traumatic history of education, many Native people are firmly committed to the belief that formal education, if properly applied, can advance and help the maintenance of tribal identity—formal education is a way of maintaining sovereignty, culture, and language. Since the passage of the ISDEAA, which provides for tribal- and community-based schools, Native nations have considered formal education to be a primary force in their cultures’ survival.

      There is a saying that knowledge changes fate. I think it is very reasonable. If people can get better education opportunities and resources, their economic level and social status may be better.

    4. In the battle for Navajo children’s education (and really, the battle for Navajo children) we see the “plight narrative” and Navajo families real economic hardships coalescing into policy that ultimately damaged Navajo sovereignty.  

      yeah, people may be confused about whether their poverty is real or fake.

    5. The program often tried to limit contact between Native children and their families. In a letter to Navajo parents written in December 1969, a social worker with the program wrote, “Many of you may be thinking of visiting your child and his foster family sometime during the Holidays. I hope you will not do this. Most of the time it is not good for you or your child. It makes you both homesick and your child must adjust again after you leave.

      Maybe they want to test whether the Native children could live without others' help, which is kind of independent from others' attention or money.

    6. They argued that without the necessary skills to survive independently outside of school, students had no choice but to return to reservations, where they remained “dependent” upon the federal government.

      It is not the right way to just rely on the government

    7. The lease money, though generally small in amount, gave the Indians further unearned income to permit the continuance of a life of idleness.

      It has to be said that they really need to work and get paid through their own labor, rather than waiting in the same place.

    8. The authors of the report concluded, “both the government and missionaries have often failed to study, understand, and take a sympathetic attitude toward Indian ways, Indian ethics, and Indian religion.”

      maybe they want absorb others' attention by these articles

    9. They amassed a litany of grim statistics on the poor economic and social conditions that afflicted most Indian reservations and urban communities

      But it is true, right?

    1. We’re doingit because we have a belief. That makes it much more powerful, because it’snot just a job.

      you have to believe this, and love this, in order to deal with it

    1. Any Indian tribe, or tribes, residing on the same reservation, shall have the right to organize for its common welfare.

      it is basic rights for Indian

    2. Yet, even at the lowest point in the history of Indian- white relations, which occurred during the 1870s to 1930s, Indigenous nations still made an effort at affirming the covenants between themselves and the United States.

      they want to make sure their rights can be protected

    3. In the spirit of their British— or, more specifically, English— forebears, the United States established a form of feudalism over Indigenous lands and peoples, in which, as noted above, Indigenous nations possessed no more than usufructuary rights to the lands they had inhabited for countless generations.

      Feudalism should be abandoned as soon as possible

    1. No Indian shall be forced to cut their hair by any institution or public agency or official, including military authorities or prison regulation, for example.

      they should be treated as this long time ago

    2. The government of the United States knows the reasons for our going to its capital city. Unfortunately, they don't know how to greet us. We go because America has been only too ready to express shame, and suffer none from the expression - while remaining wholly unwilling to change to allow life for Indian people.

      it sounds so sad

    1. It took me a while to realize that the police raided only the Indian bars and never the white ones.” [27]

      Because Indian is not accepted by them, they don't have privileges.

    2. Nixon argued that the US needed to do away with federal paternalism and stop termination—removing the threat of termination would be the “only way that self-determination can effectively be fostered.”  

      I agree with this idea!

    3. This is an Indian thing, and we want to be by ourselves and get down to making it into our center.” [24]

      I believe everyone needs their own space

    4. “It is not that Indians reject white culture, per se. It is that they reject white culture when they are forced to adapt to it by losing what they are and [what] they value.

      I agree. Nobody wants to do anything with others' threaten

    5. And, in cooperation with other nations, we should foster capital investment in areas needing development.”

      yeah, help other developing countries is also making the relationship with other countries

    6. so that Native people could be more like whites, because that was ultimately held up as the pinnacle of self-sufficiency and progress

      if they can be treated better, it will be a good way

    7. from every tribe, in every state and in every community where Indians reside, have beseeched their representatives in the Senate and the House to pass legislation granting them equal rights of citizenship with their white neighbors."

      they should be treated as this from the beginning

    1. I guess if the character was not in you, savage or otherwise, Education could not make you the man you are today. Education has developed possibilities in me—were they not there, no school could put them in!” [9]

      Yeah, education could save many people.

    2. She used her experiences of Carlisle as the basis for her essay, “An Indian Teacher Among Indians.” In that essay, she writes of the loneliness and isolation she felt in her work.

      Some personal examples and experience might let people understand the truth.

    3. This organization and others like it shared a commitment to “save” Native people by assimilating them.

      hope this can help them to protect themselves

    4. That every Indian born within the territorial limits of the United States who has voluntarily taken up within said limits his residence, separate and apart from any tribe of Indians therein, and has adopted the habits of civilized life is hereby declared to be a citizen of the United States, and is entitled to all the rights, privileges, and immunities of such citizens

      It might encourage some native people, because the citizens in the United State enjoy many rights that others did not have.

    5. As an incentive for agreeing to allot their reservations, the US offered citizenship.

      It is a way to compensate those people who lost there land.

    6. For example, in Colorado, non-Natives were becoming increasingly hostile towards the Utes because they had very valuable mining land in their possession. Government agents persuaded the Utes to accept allotments and cede most of their reservation except for much smaller tracts of agricultural and grazing land. 

      That is not fair, people who had this land should give to other people by the allotment.

    7. As long as Indians live in villages they will retain many of their old and injurious habits. Frequent feasts, community in food, heathen ceremonies and dances, constant visiting

      Sometimes people always want to change others, even though that may not correct.

  3. Oct 2020
    1. Throughout the nineteenth century, federal courts had ruled that "white" husbands of tribal women could acquire their wives' prop- 38 3 erty by virtue of entitlement, though they were not allowed to adopt tribal citizenshi

      It would be better if the opposite was true. Women could get their husbands' money and land

    2. They claimed that as Santa Clara Pueblo women they were not afforded the same rights within the tribe as male members and that, consequently, the 1939 amendment violated their civil rights as guaranteed by the ICRA.

      so women's right was the least

    3. ts and domestic appropriations. Accordingly, it ex- ~ 25 tends the authority of the Indian Arts and Crafts Board, created under the 1935 act, "to promote the development of Indian arts and crafts, for improving the econ

      hope the law could improve their status

    1. The above tribes and bands are desirous to exclude from their reservations the use of ardent spirits, and to prevent their people from drinking the same

      I don't understand the reason..

    2. For the first year after the ratification hereof, three thousand two hundred and fifty dollars; for the next two years, three thousand dollars each year; for the next three years, two thousand dollars each year; for the next four years fifteen hundred dollars each year; for the next five years twelve hundred dollars each year; and for the next five years one thousand dollars each year;

      Their interests are diminishing.

    3. The said tribes and bands of Indians hereby cede, relinquish, and convey to the United States, all their right, title, and interest in and to the lands and country occupied by them

      They accepts the unfair rule means they have to agree to lose their land.

    1. not only how and why it was made, but also how it came to be housed in museum collections—helps us to understand the ethical issues that arise today over the ownership and display of many Native objects.

      yes, there are so many information in their art and objects. I believe most of the history we found came from these objects.

    2. The Dawes Act would be terminated. Further allotments of Native land would be prohibited. The bill provided for a consolidation of allotted lands into units for community use and provided $2 million each year to purchase lands for the tribes. Any “surplus” land remaining from allotment would be restored to the reservations

      Is this a good news for Indians?

    3. The Dawes Commission also segregated young unmarried men onto separate enrollment cards, reflecting the assumption that these men would leave home and establish their own households. However, many Cherokee men lived with their parents well into adulthood

      People are not treated as human being this time, they are more like tools and objects.

    4. one drop” of African blood meant that person was black, even that concept of race was not dominant in Indian Territory. 

      many ways to judge people..

    5. Once enrolled you were enrolled as a member of the tribal nation, but also enrolled as a member of a racial group – “full blood,” “mixed-blood,” or “negro.” 

      People of different RACES and different blood will be treated differently. Is the "racial division" really correct?

    1. There were other kinds of restrictions put on the tribe, but by and large, tribes had the authority and exercised the authority against anyone, regardless of who they were, what color their skin was

      Will it really be implemented?

    2. No, this behavior is not acceptable.” And as long as the legal response includes that, I think we’re going to see a vast improvement over the Anglo- American legal system

      Clear rules can regulate people's behavior, let people know what behavior will be punished, and native women, or all women, can be protected.

    3. So, I think giving women the power to speak and the power to engage at that level is the key to holding accountability

      yes, this is the key point to solve the problem.

    4. from literally Columbus on— have viewed Native women as less that human, as rape- able: people that are, you know, non- people; people that didn’t matter; people that needed to be done away with.

      This is fallacy at all. People should be respected. Native women are not anyone's accessory.

    5. Amer-ican Indian and Alaska Native women are two and one- half times more likely to be raped or sexually assaulted than women overall in the United States, and that more than one in three Native women experience rape in their lifetime.

      Vulnerable groups are vulnerable in all aspects, especially in the era of women's low status.

    1. patent the Creek received somehow made their tribal sovereignty easier to divest. Congress established a reservation, not a dependent Indian community, for the Creek Nation.

      Can reservation mean that it can be recovered at any time?

    1. First, from 1609 to the 1770s Indians were generally described as the same as other people, as capable of sin and seduction by Satan as anyone else, and just as open to God’s salva-tion and grace

      That's not the most objective and truthful assessment, right?

    2. the removal of livelihood and language, the removal of security and self-esteem, the removal of religion and respect. Bit by bit, change by change, loss by ever-exacting loss, removalism has been as much a legacy of our history as migration, and colonialism was its cause

      I'm sorry to hear that the migration has dealt a lot of damage to the Indian nation.

    3. The legend of the Great Migration passed down through the oral tradition begins in a time when anishinaabeg were liv-ing as one large, undifferentiated group

      I heard about this before, and I remember a lot of people died during this process...

    1. On an Indian reservation, [a jury is] going to be made up of Indians, right? So the non-Indian doesn’t get a fair trial

      I am sorry to hear that..

    2. The boy responsible for that got three months in jail. In about 1956, there was a case of an Indian shot in the Platte Valley of Nebraska; only when courageous citizens in the valley persisted for months in the face of entrenched authorities did justice finally prevail.

      At that time, human life was only worth three months of prison life. At that time, there should be no "fairness" theory. Everyone even had to ensure their own safety.

    3. Of the 14,000 Choctaws who left Mississippi, 2,500 people died in the move. About 6,000 of them remained in the East—some of whom moved themselves west over the next several years.

      In this case, moving to another place is the best way. Although there are many people died on the way, it is better than sitting there waiting for death. At least, there will be a chance of survival.

    4. if they did not agree to remove, the president would declare war on them and send in the army. They agreed to sell their land, signing the first removal treaty of the Five Nations in the Southeast.

      They are forced to surrender by force. Compared with the safety of their lives, giving up land may be the only choice.

    1. Time takes a toll,” she said,“especially on elders living in abject poverty. Many of them died as we continued to struggle to settle this suit. Many more would not survive long to see a financial gain, if we had not settled now

      Time is money, time is much more valuable than money.

    2. The litigation dragged on for another ten years.

      Ten years, such a big number for these people. If they can solve this problem earlier, maybe they would live a better life...

    3. As a result, the BIA had little idea of what money came in, what should go out, or who should get it.

      They just don't care about where money goes, that is the reason why they are always losing money.

    4. Reservation Indians often have trouble getting loans from traditional banks

      This is the big problem to solve. They need their own bank and own money in their hands.

    5. When Cobellwas four years old, her father managed to get a one-room schoolhouse built so localchildren would not have to go away to boarding school

      Her father's actions influenced her in her childhood, which made her devote herself to fighting for the rights of the people when she grew up.

    6. Although the United States was supposed to provide rations under its treaties with the Blackfeet Nation, the local federal agent hoarded therations to sell on the black market

      Obviously, it is their own property and land, but they have to be managed by the Americans. This may be a disguised squeeze and demand.

    1. The European Law of Nations’ discovery doctrine and the system of colonial governmentality perpetuated under it refl ected the distilled legal experience of more than two centuries

      I don't really get this point..

    2. Steadfast beliefs in white superiority and Indian savagery can in fact be identifi ed as central organizing principles in the Court’s fi rst set of landmark decisions on Indian rights.

      Perhaps this is where some unequal treaties and racial discrimination began.

    3. The stereotypes of the Indian tribes on the frontiers of white settlement as uncivilized, war- loving, and irreconcilably savage enemies had been used by colonizing Europeans since their fi rst encoun-ters with the native peoples of the New World

      Yes, if this stereotype can be broken, perhaps Indian relations with the United States or Europe will be eased.

    1. For the benefit and comfort of the Indians, and for the prevention of injuriesor oppressions on the part of the citizens or Indians; the United States in Congressassembled shall have the sole and exclusive right of regulating the trade with the Indians,and managing all their affairs in such manners as they think proper

      The United States and the Indians seem to have reached a cooperative relationship, in a sense, really become allies, hoping that they can always live in peace.

    2. The Commissioners of the United States in Congress assembled, shall restore allthe prisoners taken from the Indians, during the late war, to the Head-Men and Warriors ofthe Cherokees, as early as is practicable

      This clause seems humanized.

    3. If any citizen or citizens of the United States, shall presume to settle upon the landsallotted to the Shawanoes by this treaty, he or they shall be put out of the protection of theUnited States

      It sounds fair, but it seems a little strange.

    4. The Shawanoe nation, do acknowledge the United States to be the sole andabsolute sovereigns of all the territory ceded to them by a treaty of peac

      Because they did not have any choice but to admitted.

    1. agree and declare that they foreverdisclaim all right and title in or to any unappropriated public lands lying within theboundaries thereof, and to all lands lying within said limits owned or held by any Indian,tribe, or nation; and that until the title to any such public land shall have been extinguishedby the United States, the same shall be and remain subject to the jurisdiction, disposal andcontrol of the United States.55

      This is the second best way to ensure that their personal rights are no longer exploited. Giving up land means giving up the same right to use land as Americans. They are just "boarding" in the United States.

    2. Treaties are never mentioned in the Sequoyah Constitution as a collectivetribal right.

      They only required for their rights, and not hurting anyone else..

    3. The people inhabiting the State do agree and declare that they forever disclaim all right andtitle in or to any unappropriated public lands lying within the boundaries thereof, and to alllands lying within said limits owned or held by any Indian, tribe, or nation; and that untilthe title to any such public land shall have been extinguished by the United States,

      See! These treaties minimized the rights of Indians step by step, and the United States took back their rights little by little until their "protection" disappeared.

    4. Ineach of these stories, the United States ignores the tribal diplomatic efforts of the time,engages in unilateral federal action, and tribal autonomy is forever diminished.

      From the beginning, the purpose of the United States was to gradually weaken the right of tribal autonomy until it disappeared. Every treaty and regulation was unequal, but the Indians had no choice but to accept it.

    1. I can work and I will work. I have four boys. I will send them to school, so they may learn to read and write. Every day I dont know what to do. Even' day the children cry for something to eat, and if I go to work like my brothers, my children will always get something to eat. I never feel tired. I used to run about in every direc

      Father's love is great. Father can work tirelessly for his child all day, worrying that the child has no food and no clothes. Although he may be treated unfairly, he still wants to work for his family.

    1. heirintention, which in any other people would be consid-ered a laudable one, is falsified, and then turned against',them to cover aid forward the design of the strong torob the weak

      It is the reality, cold and cruel to the Indians but they can no nothing to protect themselves.

    2. But nevertheless these Indians have rightswhich should be respected, and these rights the pro -posed legislation would treat with utter disregard.

      Yes! Their requests should be taken seriously! The treatment should be as fair as possible.

    3. practically independent of the United StatesGovernment but operating under its sanction, withoutany modification of the tribal relations alreadyexisting among the

      I think it is a unique law but might not be accepted by American government, they might lose the control of the land.

    1. And whereas the United States are engaged in a just and necessary war, in defence and support of life, liberty and independence, against the King of England and his adherents, and as said King is yet possessed of several posts and forts on the lakes and other places,

      I remember a saying: the enemy of the enemy is a friend. Maybe it also applies to the current treaty signed by aborigines and Americans, ha ha ha ha

    2. That all offences or acts of hostilities by one, or either of the contracting parties against the other, be mutually forgiven, and buried in the depth of oblivion, never more to be had in remembrance.

      It sounds easy, but none of us know the position the people are standing on.

    1. Would a Native state be the best way to protect the territories and rights of Native residents of Indian Territory?

      It depends on what kind of laws and rules they made, and how the rules could be carry out.

    2. Would a Native state, a political entity recognized by the US and devoted to tribal needs, have been the best way to safeguard tribal sovereignty?

      The constitution will give the aborigines a minimum guarantee of life. Americans should at least abide by the promises and treaties and provide them with the most basic rights. If there is no constitution, I think they may be exploited again, oppressed and even a war in the near future.

    3. The Cherokees refused to ratify because they feared how it would be interpreted by the US Congress.

      To some extent, the formulation of a constitution represents the autonomy and legislative power of a country. I think some people disagree because they do not want to recognize or fear the rights of the United States.

    4. Native land was believed to ultimately belong to the United States, although it was also recognized that Natives occupied the land, and that they could cede it to the US without duress.Natives were considered to be culturally and intellectually inferior to whites.Native tribes must nevertheless be treated as nations capable of entering into diplomatic negotiations and making war. [15]

      That's why white and indigenous rights and status are so different that they may have emerged from treaty by treaty statements.

    5. And it is further agreed on between the contracting parties should it for the future be conducive for the mutual interest of both parties to invite any other tribes who have been friends to the interest of the United States, to join the present confederation, and to form a state whereof the Delaware nation shall be the head, and have a representation in Congress.

      It sounds good! Finally they got their status in this war.

    6. Wunder notes that, as the war neared its end, General George Washington avoided using Natives in his regiments and distanced himself from any commitments to them.

      In this way, the natives have become victims of this game. Whether the British win or the Americans win, they may not get any benefits, or even worse.

    7. Supporters of Pontiac’s armed resistance found powerful, spiritual support for their movement through Neolin’s proclamation that the creator favored Natives and regarded white settlers as intruders.

      I don't know whether this kind of spiritual power is right or wrong, but I believe that everything is reasonable. Maybe through this rebellion, the status of aborigines will change.

    8. But what if they sided with the Americans?

      If they sided with the Americans, they would hold their own land anyway. If the Americans won, their lives would be better than now, they might have a new institution and so.

    9. they invited chiefs from the Senecas, the largest nation in the British-allied Haudenosaunee Confederacy

      Maybe this is the first time the Natives are seen as important role in the land. It is a bid deal that they are invited by Delaware, Shawnee, and Seneca-Cayuga leaders.

    10. Militant factions of different tribes coming as far as the Senecas in New York, the Chippewas in Minnesota and Natives from Illinois came together to remove the British from posts recently occupied by the French.

      Maybe this rebellion made all natives from all over the United States to be together to fight with the White...

    1. Yet, over time they switch and they calm down.  They end up learning more once they aren’t feeling the pressure” from grades.

      Getting great scores is not the purpose for students, on opposite, learning more from their experiences is the goal to achieve.

    2. Without grades, “I think my relationships with students are better,” Drier says.

      Sure! It is a great point! Grade always be the barrier between students and teachers. Their relationship is influenced by the grade, if the grade is good, their relationship would be good; but if the grade is not good, their relationship might not be the same good as before.

    3. If people find that idea alarming, it’s probably because they realize it creates a more democratic classroom, one in which teachers must create a pedagogy and a curriculum that will truly engage students rather than allow teachers to coerce them into doing whatever they’re told. 

      I kind of understand why you gave us the chance to grade for ourselves, I like the style and I think most of us would like your choice.

    4. Moreover, these schools point out that their students are often more motivated and proficient learners, thus better prepared for college, than their counterparts at traditional schools who have been preoccupied with grades.

      I think it is a good way to select students, in other words, maybe this way can help the school get more creative students because they have more experience than others.

    5. It’s not enough to disseminate grades more efficiently — for example, by posting them on-line. 

      Sometimes post the grades online will cause students' self-respect got attack, they want to compare to others and do better than others, which is not the purpose to study.

    6. If you’re sorting students into four or five piles, you’re still grading them.  Rubrics typically include numbers as well as labels, which is only one of several reasons they merit our skepticism

      Yes! The motivation is not pure for sorting student into four or five groups. There will be competition between students because of the grading standard. Students do not have correct motivation to study or learn knowledge.

    7. If you have one eye on how close you are to achieving your goal, that leaves only one eye for your task.”

      Sometimes other elements like grade, task, deadline, etc will influence us. We might not be very focus on what we are doing right now.

    8. Grades tend to diminish students’ interest in whatever they’re learning.

      Yes! We always think about how to get better grades rather than learning the knowledge step by step!

    9. “I remember the first time that a grading rubric was attached to a piece of my writing….Suddenly all the joy was taken away.  I was writing for a grade

      I also had the same experience when I first came to the United States to take writing courses, I remembered I was so sad that I did not match the requirements by the teacher 😞