How can Proctorio claim that their platform and company help ensure learning integrity when their CEO is in the Washington Post positing that perhaps a degree earned during the COVID-19 pandemic should be called a "corona diploma"?

This is an attack on the learning integrity of honest students.

Proctorio has been aggressive with critics and reporters in claiming that they do not use facial recognition technology. But as has been documented, they have been marketing the product as using facial recognition technology.

In their bid response to California State University's request for proposal, they repeatedly stated that they use facial recognition technology.

It's all very confusing. Almost like they want to have it both ways - silence critics and make BANK.

Why is the door being left open here to more invasive identity verification technology without consent? Are there plans to implement biometric surveillance or facial recognition which matches to personal identity?