I think it would be interesting to add a page or two on how post-human you would like to make your new system of education, how much out of space and time and into the digital you want it, how much a mixture of eastern and western thinkings you want it...?

I think it could be interesting to bring in the concept of multiversity in your idea of future university and maybe try to bring some other Eastern education view points to encourage your previous argument?

Is it really failure if it is what is asked of them, and they are "successful" at it?

I don't understand that how you would put that in place in Universities. By making students correcting themselves and killing their own ideas? Is it failure? It it others critiquing your project or oneself critiquing theirs?

I think this is really interesting, yes.

How would that work in Interdisciplinary studies?

I think these questions could be asked at the beginning to see what the person thinks before going through your project, and how they think about it afterwards, leaving them a way to interact with the questions?

Are you planning on asking people to discuss with these questions?

I didn't really understand this part. Is it about alternating working and studying?

I really like this concept, because I think we arrive to college not mature enough to handle everything at first.

Wouldn't it be interesting to mix it with an Easterner way to learn and to see the world in order to prove your previews point?

Super cool idea! Would you consider coding a language class in your curriculum, of interacting with technology?

Isn't the world already about selling and making consumer goods already the basis of our society? How will it help to change the world?

Interesting idea, but what do you think pf encouraging children to sell what they create rather than exchanging or simply sharing ideas?

Interesting!

However, usually these cost a lot of money and there is already a problem of accessibility of education? Won't that worsen it?

In the rest of the project you talk about anti-humanist approaches you don't want to incorporate that too?

Cool way to link back to your other part. You thought about it and that's why I think it could be interesting to approach your project display through a less linear way, through visual paths maybe or other versions of the layout in order to be able to make other choices on which way we are going? Maybe divide it as your main parts and give hyperlinks like this so the person can read the argument that serves the one you are making like here.

Will it be accessible through a demonetized and democratized medium? How?

Very interesting point. But how is it changed by the AI? Isn't it replacing one-teacher-fits-all model by one-AI-fits-all model? Even if it is distributed on a one on one basis, would the AI adapt to each student? If yes, how is that imaginable?

Again, way less long than the other ones but I think it could be interesting to annotate the some parts of the video.

I think it could be interesting to challenge some of your own examples with the accessibility that are given to them. Some people don't have their own computers or their own VR medium, how do you define space if your school is still inside something. I think one interesting point of the multiversity is also outside of the digital frame and more in connection with the city so that people could access to knowledge everywhere. It is indeed complicated to find a way to not link knowledge to a place whether it is digital or not because our resources to access to data are still grounded into space and time

How accessible it is? Is it free?

What is Digital Education? What do you exactly mean by that? Education of the Digital or through the Digital, or both?

He excludes Nobel Peace Prizes or not?

By this do you mean colleges which offer a liberal arts program?

Super interesting point

I think the phallogocentrism of this term could be criticized and maybe some examples of Renaissance Women, or other people could be made.

These are two very very very long videos. I think it could be interesting to annotate some parts of them so that the reader of your project can get what you want them to get out of it to further understand your point?

This is very interesting

I think this page should be very important to the rest of the argument. Saying what you understand as the East and the West?

For me it is very complicated to separate streams of thought and cultures geographically. Because for example, in the Americas, some Indigenous peoples had more genders than one, and I don't know where you would put them on your geographical map. I think this needs to be nuanced?

I think it is an interesting idea, I have never considered the Middle East as being very Western. What about Africa?

I think it is very interesting, trying to breach the binary of Western vs. Eastern

It is really interesting and encouraging I think to know that such fields open up to people that study arts and the humanities. However it could be interesting to talk about digital humanities within schools/colleges too here?

It is a very long video, I think it could be interesting to annotate some parts of it to make your point.

I think it is a really interesting way to go through the question of the Future of Education. However it is maybe very linear and I thought it could be interesting to maybe have a more "zigzagging" way of navigating the project, even though I think it is really well constructed and deconstructing it might be counterproductive. Moreover about the Discussion Questions? Are you planning on having people interact with them and be able to answer them?

I think it is really interesting.

I think it could be interesting to add that Interdisciplinary Studies are a very old concept, for example with the Liberal Arts Trivium and Quadrivium that have changed now, and I think it could be interesting to differentiate different kind of Interdisciplinary Studies (the humanist one, the anti-humanist one and the post-humanist perhaps?) Because according to me it is complicating to say that Interdisciplinary Studies as a whole can be a solution to Humanist's definition of the human, as they were an inherent part of Humanism?