But 60% of species displayed different lunar activity patterns in different populations, suggesting that many species exhibit behavioral plasticity in their lunar activity. We conclude that neither phylogenetic signal, tapetum lucidum as proxy for visual acuity, nor lunar illumination are able to reliably predict lunar activity patterns for all species, and natural selection may favor behavioral flexibility in nocturnal activity.
It is fascinating that neither the Predation Risk nor the Visual Acuity Hypothesis completely explains the results. That suggests nocturnal behavior is influenced by more complex interactions than just moonlight intensity. I am curious about how human disturbance or artificial light at night might add another layer to these patterns, especially as ecosystems become more affected by human activity.