This study has found that T. hirsuta may be displaced by M. galloprovincialis in a future ocean, causing a shift in the biogenic habitat of the Australian shores. Such a shift in habitat may affect the infauna; future conditions may cause infauna to prefer specific mussel habitats (either T. hirsuta or M. galloprovincialis) and lead to an overall decline in infaunal molluscs.
What would happen if the restoration projects were focused on planting native mussels and the invasive species still continue to take over, should the project focus shift to the invasive species, or stay on the native species? Would it be more ethical to let the new invasive species take over and form new habitats because they might survive climate change better than the native species?