I disagree with this point. its attempting to connect intersectionality to social justice, its community, and state that more support will be gained for the community if it simply gets more supporters. In my opinion, thats how you end up with many, many people in one group that have no idea what its truly about (which is actually the current state of politics). I feel that the necessary course of action is to combat the stated definition of intersectionality, and remove the mob mentality from social justice to instead educate all on why matters are or aren't correct.

This is a very important concept in conducting live research, especially when using statistics. many factors go into determining the responses gathered for a statistic, and its important to account for bias when available. In this example, its saying that people that are simply members of a group cause them to believe the same claims by other members and group leaders. Bias is also identified by koshino in the proctor conducting interviews at a school, as people respond differently to different interviewers.

This statement is a good framework for needing a community. This introduces the "why" for the community's need for social reform, and also introduces the issue. Glum introduced her community's issue by talking about why her friend was moving, and relates to this parralel method.

even though this is not the point of the piece, the statement still has significant purpose. I feel this way because the tone of the claim is very passive aggressive, a way for her to inadvertently state her opinion that's wholly off topic. I know this because i actually do this.

This statement is very interesting. in san francisco, its very hard to to have get-togethers in any type of ample space. The community she's appealing to here can sympathize with this statement to better udnerstand the circumstances that she is writing this piece in.

this sentence highlights the community the author identifies with, and creates a community for which she represents. This is important because in our research papers, we need to identify ourselves to the reader. This is done in kosino's piece as well.

The community here is still teachers, but its a simple but helpful note. the issue is that students aren't interacting at all with the assignment. To correct this, teachers allowing students to manipulate the curriculum will create a more responsive environment.

This comment targets students and their study habits. The issue is that they become very unmotivated. I truly agree with this because there are many assignments that i'm not very well accompanied with. If a student isn't fully immersed in an assignment, the true meaning of it can't possibly be brought to it's full capacity.

This sentence target educators (teachers and faculty alike) and the issue is that they all have these ideas but do not put them into action in any shape way or form. I feel this way because so many teachers are uninspired and boring and go with the script because in the end they're there for the paycheck.

*Unwavering love for its history.

This school sucks the dick of everything that happened in the past and feels the need to honor it 24/7 while not pushing for the new age of world-changing minds to be stimulated enough to make more history.

This is the only statement on this page i agree with. its jsut stating the definition of courage.

i disagree. courage is the willingness to accomplish your chief outcomes despite the conditions necessary to meet.

This may be the mission, but the curriculum for sf state does not reflect this ideal in any way.

I it realistic for an being to get more than 6 hours of sleep, uninterrupted? its better to portion sleep based on activity.

sleep is something people only seem to value when necessary. But who wouldn't? one of the most human fears in life is time. people have achieved the impossible: getting more time. by sacrificing sleep, you can have more time in your life to experience more. seemingly.

I don't necessarily agree with this, however i'm a guilty abuser of sleep: its easily expendable but for some reason my daily tech goof-offs aren't. a very interesting concept.

State funding for college has fallen, and tuition has risen. Students either accumulate a lifetime of debt or simply cannot go to college.

This is another very interesting concept. A lot of the colleges stated above are the bottom of the barrel colleges that everyone disses, yet there is a lot of upwards mobility for those that achieve their success there.

It seems that in a modern society, the working classs is becoming more reluctant to go to college for the weak payoff of hard work and would rather go straight into working, as it saves time and accumulates money faster.

Its very crucial that the message was received in the correct context. This situation could spiral out of control if the child did not udnerstand what their mom meant by "you don't have a choice" while being abandoned for college.

THis piece is very interesting. the confidence exuberated by the authot is remarkable as most students would be embarassed beyond belief.

this is what they did at the SFSU orinetation. isntead of having the parents leave, they had us leave and tour and also choose our classes. the parents were forced to listen to a 5 hour long speech.

What does some public policy experts entice? the definition is something dangerous to play around with in the purposes of admission for people will then choose the identity that is most beneficial.

I don't really understand what this remark means. it might mean something synonymous to threading the needle or a hyperbole therein of itself.

despite the context the articale provides, i disagree. I believe that the identity of your generation is a conglomerate of your physical and digital footprint along with your identity. This means that your identity is yours to choose, however you can't identify with a generation that you haven't left a significant footprint in.

I also agree with this. this means that its impossible to understand a subject by simply understanding what to do with it. You need to know why it works. It makes me think of the example; you can't master an iphone by knowing how to use it, you need to know why it works and what makes it tick.

I believe that using predetermined estimates for a class' performance are the best way to ensure that your class will NOT follow them. If you present expectations for students based on past students, they'll feel too constricte and push the limits of your deadline. rather its better to look at the present student's conglomerate efforts and decide what is best to help them succeed and learn.

its very important to keep all variables in an experiment the same. This means that while the questions were the same, the same interviewer would have been necessary to compare the response of the students. the occupation of the interviewer would also matter. students respond better to other students, and teachers have a lack of respect for students so they'd give better response to other teachers,

This seems like a simple concept, but its very true. GPA's are a very very rough image of a student's relevance to their efforts, and in my opinion need a factor of citizenship added to allow more weight, like this class.

As a student who very often opposes faculty, the main reason i appose faculty is for not understanding what they want out of me. It's very interesting in a zoom out perspective because faculty members very rarely know that students don't understand.

This is a good tip but it provides no context for what excess information is. Rather, the rules should be to look for ways to concise information; you wrote it so obviously it has value to you.

this rule can be broken to make the reader feel dumber for not understanding a concept, thus making the claim superior, simple, and significant

the way you write numbers can depict different attitudes. writing out grammatically a large number can add value to quantity.

This comment is crucial yet very simple: the only way to actively explore your writing voice is to experiment.

The point of this article is to fully understand the rules of english in order to successfully break them. That's the best way to garuntee you have a unique voice in your writing.

This comment relates to the relevancy of how research doesn't truly change in its purpose or goals.

a very vague statement... theres not much proud history besides protests...

No, the students equip the students. The resources available are all student run to help students.

Its pretty mf interesting that its encouraged we interact with our community, however our president thats stepping down doesn't.