This means research is also about communication, how we share what we discover.

This quote encourages me to be open-minded when doing research. I should not just look for what I already believe, but also be ready to learn something new.

I like this idea because it takes the pressure off of having to know everything at the start.

This shows that research is about being curious and using a plan to find answers.

Witte highlights that primary research encourages adaptability when problems arise during the process.

This reminds me of how class debates feel more engaging and thought-provoking than formal research papers.

Why do schools continue to use this outdated approach when research should be about curiosity and discovery?

I relate to this because in many classes, research papers feel more like copying facts than exploring something original or meaningful.

They want writing to train students for independence and problem-solving, not just to fit.

This makes the writing sound like students are machines repeating instead of thinkers creating.

This shows how 5PE makes students passive. It trains them to accept formulas rather than challenge ideas.

The tone shows their criticism that the 5PE is treated like a universal tool, but actually fails in most real writing situations.

Viergegge points out that the problem is in how formulas are used, rather than in their existence.

This highlights that formulas can kill creativity. This makes me question if writing meant to be fun, or just functional?

I like how this shows that structure isn’t the problem, but failing to let students decorate and make it their own is.

This shows how the format gives students confidence when starting, like the training wheel on a bike.

Rodríguez explains the negative impact of removing oneself from writing. Without the writer’s presence, the work lacks authority and readers are less likely to trust it.

This quote shows that identity and perspective cannot be separated from writing. Rodríguez uses Ortega’s words to argue that the writer’s personal circumstances and voice are essential for authentic expression and cannot simply be erased.

This is important because it explains why the “no self” approach harms writing. The writer’s voice is what creates authenticity and meaning for the reader.

Rodríguez rejects that writing should be impersonal. This shows that the essay’s main argument is about keeping the writer’s presence alive, which challenges the common school rule of “don’t use ‘I’.”

Wardle explains why no exact writing exists. Each writing situation has unique demands shaped by community expectations.

She offers a solution, such as the transfer of skills. Students should practice applying what they’ve learned to new and specific contexts.

Wardle argues that believing in “general writing” causes real harm. Students think they should already know how to write in every situation, but they must adapt each time.

Wardle emphasizes that writing is always tied to a specific context, purpose, or audience, and she’s challenging the idea that writing is one universal skill.

This shows that resistance and awareness in someone's learning process is important. Also the writer's mindset is vey important to reflect their growth.

This shows how beginners are often judged harshly instead of being supported. This highlights that making mistakes should be seen as part of the learning process.

This is crucial because education focuses on the final product, so students miss out on the opportunity to learn, which is essential for growth as a writer.

This highlights the harm of the "genius writer" idea. Many students think they should have perfect writing naturally, but writing is a process that requires revision and practice.

I like how he uses one of his favorite books as evidence of his reading habits, making the overall narrative more humorous and creative.

The use of dialogue and body language humanizes the narrative and makes it more approachable. I like his writing style because it helps the reader be more engaged.

This makes remember the memories of reading Harry Potter when I was a kid. Pasqualin connects his identity to a well known author, making his claim relatable to many readers that grew up reading Harry Potter.

I like how Pasqualin sets up the scene in a way to help the reader picture his memory. This shows how sensory details can make literary narrative more engaging.

Failure affects not only grades but also identity and self-worth. Sometimes, failure does not allow people to really show who they are and turns them into being more isolated, which lets their voices be less heard.

The author feels exhausted after all the failures she is going through. Consistent failures lead to withdrawal. Failure should not limit people from what they are capable of.

This displays the author's hope and disappointment with the current state, and shows her belief in doing better the next time.

This shows early confidence and balance skills, and failure shifts her relationship with learning. I like how she is relating writing to math, and it is something she loves, which helps in motivating anyone to keep going.

This shows how Alexie becomes the mentor figure, giving others the opportunities he once fought for. Alexie wants people to fight for their education and save their lives.

This shows the author's determination, and I like how he used pride as a shield against failure and doubt. Also, this shows how the author has a great mindset, wanting to keep going and not letting failure stop him.

This suggests that books were more than entertainment, but they are also a tool that gives hope and identity. Books help to motivate people to learn and shape their identity.

This shows how literacy can begin in unexpected ways, which connects to how kids today learn through comics, games, and Youtube. Everyone has a way that they are interested in that can develop their brains and help them in life.

Stories are a form of entertainment and a way we create reality. It made me pause and think about how every person's worldview is shaped by the stories they tell themselves and hear from others.

Storytelling is more relevant today because of technology and social media. It encourages educators to see storytelling as a skill that prepares students to express themselves.

This is important because it reframes storytelling as a tool for teachers as well as students. The stories students share reveal what matters to them, which helps the teacher connect better with the student.

This shows storytelling as an active, living process. It is not just words, but it's a connection between the teller and the listener. This makes storytelling unique compared to reading and memorizing facts.

This line highlights the importance of validating students' voices in school. Also, it suggests that education should embrace students' authentic identities instead of correcting them. I think that schools should help students share their perspectives and learn from each other rather than trying to follow the instructions that might hide their voices.

This line says that storytelling is a skill and a part of how we think. It is interesting that our brains are built to understand life through stories rather than just facts. This makes me wonder why storytelling is not used much in schools.