When a black person presented a dissenting perspective to a group of whites, the perspective was perceived as more novel and led to broader thinking and consideration of alternatives than when a white person introduced that same dissenting perspective.
A very crucial part of who we are as a people, we like to receive information from all sorts of places. It can be taken as truth more or less if that person differs from the kind of person we are. It's important to incoporate
The groups with racial diversity significantly outperformed the groups with no racial diversity.
This reminds me of when i was put into a focus group to share my experiences living and growing up around a very diverse population then moving to a place with a lot of white people. It had the same outcome as far as benefit. I changed a lot of the white people's perspectives while also learning more about how they grew up.
People who are different from one another in race, gender and other dimensions bring unique information and experiences to bear on the task at hand.
This is important to highlight because a lot of us seek information from our lived experiences. When enhancing the spread of our teams' experiences, it can change some values we hold either good or bad.
Diversity enhances creativity. It encourages the search for novel information and perspectives, leading to better decision making and problem solving.
To bounce off of the last annotation, this section i pulled is to give value to the very crucial part of any operation, the diversity. These are all factual in the sense of actual collection of information, the purpose is to see every angle in order to efficiently do a task with minimal room for mistake.
Research has shown that social diversity in a group can cause discomfort, rougher interactions, a lack of trust, greater perceived interpersonal conflict, lower communication, less cohesion, more concern about disrespect, and other problems. So what is the upside?
I think the significance of this is to fight the "All-White" world we live in today. This is here to challenge the thought process of most of us here who have been educated under all white processes and all white thoughts.
mention of the word “diversity” can lead to anxiety and conflict.
Working in a diversity office, this is a constant question whether or not this term has certain connotations. The purpose for showing this is the text I believe is to spark conversation about how people would use this term to sort of confirm that a certain organization is being equitable.
racially diverse groups exchanged a wider range of information during deliberation about a sexual assault case than all-white groups did.
I think the purpose of composing this statistic is to show that sticking with the people or with the institution that teaches and expresses the same idea, it cannot produce answers that will resonate with others experience.
Members of a homogeneous group rest somewhat assured that they will agree with one another;
This really speaks to how the educational aspect of someone here in America would learn. Everything is said as it was taught, sometimes even depicting a totally opposite image of things that happened. It is easy to live with people who think the same, but when challenged, it can spark all sorts of change.
by encouraging the consideration of alternatives even before any interpersonal interaction takes place.
I think it was a great idea for the author to include this part especially since diversity is such a necessity coming forth into the future, its evokes different perspective and different values.