3 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. From the outset, we had agreed that the museum would not display prominent pictures of the maimed or burnt victims of the atomic bombing, as we thought they were too gruesome, as well as unnecessary.

      If the exhibition's primary objective was to present a critical, multi-perspective history rather than a national celebration, excluding graphic imagery of victim suffering creates a fundamental contradiction. Sanitizing the physical realities of the atomic bomb shields the public from its true consequences, ultimately compromising the critical examination the museum sought to achieve. A huge contradiction.

    2. When the Smithsonian decided to exhibit the “Enola Gay,” the B-29 bomber that dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, the director and curators of the National Air & Space Museum (NASM) hardly anticipated the firestorm of controversy that would result. While the “Enola Gay fiasco,” as some at the museum came to call it, was not the first skirmish in America’s ongoing culture wars, it was an ominous warning of the battles to come. As a NASM curator involved in the early planning of the exhibit, who was also present at the debacle, the following is a first-person account of the origins, evolution, and fate of the “Enola Gay” exhibit, titled “The Last Act: The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II.”[1]

      Controversy over having public museums be for multi-perspective history vs spaces for national celebration

  2. Sep 2026
    1. In the expansion, what students are asked to know and do shifted. For example, the earlier version asked students to evaluate the contributions of African American individuals. The new standards now ask students to simply identify African American individuals. And there are now gaps in terms of standards focusing on ancient African civilizations outside of the context of slavery.

      Knowing people from history does not really matter. However, knowing what their contributions are is crucial to understanding history. This is because those contributions have caused historical imprints thus why we are talking about them and referring to them as historical figures in the first place. You take that away and they just seem like random people we could forget about.