I find that women seem to be more vulnerable to attack than men. Take what happened recently as an example. Recently, an amateur named Mai Mai participated in a divorce variety show. Her performance in the show received a lot of attacks due to her excessive individualism. Almost every video related to her received a lot of criticism from netizens (almost 10,000 comments), and she was also on the hot search many times because of her performance. But on the other hand, a male rapper did a lot of unethical things, insulting fans, sleeping with fans, etc. Although the severity of these behaviors was far greater than that of the previous woman, his discussion was far less than that of the previous lady, even though he was an artist.

The tracking here shocked me. Although it is very important to be faithful in a relationship, I think it is inappropriate to track your partner's social media to ensure that he or she is faithful. Everyone needs their own privacy. Although they are a couple, they are also two separate individuals. Each of them has their own privacy, and they should also respect the privacy of others. This act of invading others' privacy is why tracking is classified as a form of harassment.

Yes, not only on the Internet, but also in real life, such as in group tasks in school, most of the time it is a small number of people who complete a large part of the task. One reason is that this small number of people has a very thorough understanding of the knowledge, so they can complete the task more efficiently. The remaining people do not have a deep understanding of the knowledge, and they cannot provide too much value to the group. Another reason is that the remaining people are unreliable and they simply want to throw the task to others. I think this belongs to the first reason.

This brought me a new way of thinking. When people work together to do something, in order to make their existence more valuable, people often want to contribute to the team, even though sometimes this contribution is not positive. However, due to people's contributions, this can cause a lot of confusion. And when people are online, they often don't think, they just accept everything they see online, and don't think before believing it, which will make more and more people believe in false information and cause confusion.

From this point of view, I think the disadvantages of data mining outweigh the advantages. Although data mining can improve the user experience, when the platform uses this data to make profits, it will harm the users. It puts the cart before the horse and turns something that should serve the users into something that hurts the users.

I think this is wrong. Although the platform can recommend better content to us after getting our information, such behavior will cause trouble to users. When people do not want their information to be discovered by others or their interests change and they are tired of their previous interests, seeing the content pushed by the platform based on data mining will make users irritated.

I have heard that it takes two to tango. When one party keeps trying to cause a riot, others will ignore him and he will lose interest in causing a riot. But is this really useful on the Internet? Some people are constantly venting their negative emotions in life through the Internet and spreading negative and pessimistic comments. Our disregard may make them more rampant, so there needs to be specific regulations to reduce the occurrence of such behavior.

What causes women to be treated unfairly in society? We can always see women being criticized online, from their appearance to their figure to their personality, and in many dirty jokes, women's privacy is the most ridiculed. However, people on the Internet have magnified this misogyny by taking advantage of the "anonymous nature" of the Internet.

This reminds me of Kpop fans who buy robots to like their idols' posts in order to make their idols look more popular. Because people have a herd mentality, when people find that an idol's post has a lot of likes, they may choose to like it as well.

This reminds me of an internet celebrity I knew before. She uploaded a video about picking up elementary school students' homework in Paris, and this video caused a big sensation on the video website. But later it was discovered that her video was self-directed and self-acted. She gained huge traffic with a video, but in the end her social platform account was blocked for spreading false facts.

Yes, infinite scrolling really makes people more addicted to social media. For example, TikTok, I think it's also a kind of infinite scrolling, you can never finish watching short videos, and at the same time, when you finish watching the previous short video, you will look forward to the next content, so it makes you addicted.

I found that social media users have high stickiness. When I saw that Facebook caused many social media platforms to close down, I thought about why Facebook still has a lot of users since its inception. I think the high stickiness of social media users is because they have posted a lot of posts on this software. When they change the social media they use, the new social media does not have the posts they posted before, so they are reluctant to change.

Are these the three primary colors that can make up all colors? This is very clever, only three colors can make up all colors, but I am curious how the computer can mix these colors in the correct proportions to produce the exact color? At the same time, how is white composed?

This reminds me of the Java language I learned in CSE class. In Java, a series of characters is also called a string. But in Java, if you want to enter some specific symbols such as brackets and quotation marks in a string, you need to add "\" to make the machine recognize it smoothly.

He reminded me of a saying: "If you keep company with the good, you will be good; if you keep company with the bad, you will be bad." Since some of the language on social media is very negative, if the bot is allowed to learn the language of social media users without supervision, the bot will eventually get out of control. Therefore, I think before designing the bot, we should tell the bot what it can learn and what it cannot learn. This is very interesting. I look forward to the content of the book later.

I think people post various offensive posts through a large number of bots not only to annoy the bloggers being attacked, but also to confuse a large number of ignorant onlookers and change their views on a thing. There is a word called herd mentality, which means that when people see that many people's ideas are different from their own, they may choose to change their own ideas to make them the same as the majority.