15 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2025
    1. García (2009), in particular, has promoted this particular perspective, reviving the term translanguaging to refer to the ways in which bilingual speakers draw flexibly on their linguistic repertoires. For García, translanguaging is inclusive of—but not limited to—the practice that linguists have historically called codeswitching. Otheguy, García, & Reid (2015) define translanguaging as “the deployment of a speaker’s full linguistic repertoire without regard for watchful adherence to the socially and politically defined boundaries of named (and usually national and state) languages” (p. 283).
      This cracks me up because my brother in laws and their partners codeswitch all the time when speaking to my husband, myself and our children. One brother in law is half Haitian and speaks English, Spanish, Creole, French and Haitian while his partner is Cuban and is not so good at French or Creole but speaks all the other languages. My other brother in law is technically Jamaican (born there to American parents) and speaks English and Spanish while his partner is Hundurian and speaks a dialect of Spanish and English. Now even though they are all between 49 and 60 years old they all codeswitch in both spoken language and written text. We have running family jokes that we must pay close attention when speaking to the four of them… we might agree to something we didn’t mean too.
      
    2. needs to begin with the assumption that we are enriching the linguistic and literacy horizons of children who already possess sophisticated multi-/bilingual competencies rather than with the assumption that we are remedying deficits of children who have limited proficiency in academic Spanish.

      I see this with my one student who can speak Romanian and English fluently and then can also speak three languages enough to communicate with fluent speakers as people think he is deficient in English because he can not read and write with much more than a 1-2 grade level. He is not deficient at all. We have been working on improving his writing and reading skills so he will be able to cook from a recipe and read the Bible as his personal goals.

    3. use in school and out-of-school settings to identify commonalities across formal and informal learning contexts

      I love this use of formal and informal learning contexts and wish I could see what my students do during off hours so I could see if what we are doing works with their lifestyle or if something else would work better. School has so many rules and regulations that you don’t always see what a child is really like until they are out of the rigid classroom. Sometimes it is all they can do just to make it through the day in classes then add language barriers and it can be super over whelming.

    4. This church language may be more complex than the language they encounter in school texts in both English and Spanish. For example, some of the Latinx students at the church who were in ESL programs engaged in higher level language and literacy practices at church than in their high school (Ek, 2008/9)

      This really got my brain juices going because how many times as teachers or parents have we not read things that may have been a little harder for the children? Giving the students the chance to see or read with you during something harder could make all the difference. I was really really bad at reading and comprehension while in school however it all changed when an English teacher allowed us to read anything…. I tried Stephen King, then Dean Koontz. My reading and reading comprehension over the years has greatly improved. We must learn to let them read and expose them to new text even if it is hard.

    5. Sunday school teachers organized the learning so that students could have multiple opportunities to engage in practices valued by the church and to make sense of and appropriate the texts and principles.

      I love that the teachers used multiple ways for the students to learn. I have tried to learn multiple languages however there was nothing but book work and repeat what the teacher said. I did not have a practical way to learn and use what I was learning. It was difficult to understand and I believe using multiple ways to approach learning is best.

    6. Education scholars highlight religious settings as important sites for language and literacy learning

      I totally agree with this because most religions have a written word they read from and this gives a person of a different language the opportunity to practice the new language in a safe environment with others. There is bonding while reading and studying one’s religious beliefs. I have a current student who is academically low in reading and a personal goal of theirs is to be able to read the Holy Bible better so they created his own vocabulary words that he would like to work on.

  2. Oct 2025
    1. Second, I pointed at the productive nature of small disagreements.

      I love showing the students how this works with the students when they have different answers to problems or differences in opinions. We discuss the different ideas and dissect or unpack the ideas together and see if one answer has a better reason than the other. This helps the students understand how everyone thinks differently and comes to their own conclusions differently. Some of the responses from the students are mind blowing and fantastic rationals due to personal experiences.

    2. In addition, WRSL, as a practice that works toward socioecological justice, involves an element of historicity—knowing the histories of land and peoples that have resulted in current systems of powered relations.

      My Mamaw always said “We are from here”, I never really understood as a child because she never said more like a town or country. Later I learned that we are literally from America because we are Native Americans. Her mother, who would have been my Great Great Grandmother, was from a reservation if I remember my history correctly. The correlation about how she took care of nature and how I was taught to do the same is from our native roots. None of my other ancestors or family do this, which I find very strange that they do not have histories or traditions tied to the land.

    3. What can video ethnographic studies of family interactions in everyday, outdoor learning contexts (berry picking, fishing, forest walks, etc.) tell us about the multitude of ways that people go about making relations, or teaching and learning, about/with the natural world? What insights can we gain about learning by focusing on the organization of talk, action, and embodied movement in these learning environments?

      This reminds me of my Gramma and my Mamaw, (her mom) who always took me on outings to the mountains, the beach, fishing and more because they both would always have a bag that we kept for trash. This bag was to make sure that we left the places we went to better than how we came across them. If that meant emptying our bag a couple of times then so be it but we never left trash if we came across something while we were out. My husband’s family was horrified that we picked up trash when we went out and just could not understand why we did. I taught this to my children and we all would forget sometimes to bring a bag then we would wash our finds that ended up in our pockets. It has become a bit of a laughing point because of all the little finds that come home with me. My son and I compare fishing hooks and lures that we find while fishing.

    4. Moreover, increasing diversity in research endeavors can deepen our understanding of human potential and foster new forms of teaching and learning relationships that are emancipatory

      Learning to think outside of the box for research can really give different perspectives about any subject and can be so liberating to pick things you would not normally learn about. In class I try to have the students learn about things they are interested in but do not have experience with. This way the students are not relying on ideas or information that they already know and have to go outside the comfort zone. We have also been doing this in the foods class I teach and it gives us so much more diversity.

    5. Leaving aside the question of whether exercises and worksheets are satisfying for children, it is the case that these are solitary activities, and much of the time in schools children are expected to engage in these activities on their own, neither receiving nor providing help that is similar to how children often engage in chores in middle-class families.

      I see my own students more engaged when they are in groups and we are working together. I have put two big tables together in my classroom and started getting away from the solitary exercises because my special education students are already behind in social skills and understanding roles in group activities. I do this because their peers are so far ahead of them academically that they can not engage or contribute to their group the same and then the groups accuse the students of cheating when really they just cannot comprehend what the class is doing. I am trying to help the students learn social cues and academics with the activities that are centered around group work.

    6. . There are therefore parallels between the solitary chores children were often asked to do at home and the solitary exercises they engaged in at school.

      This really hit home for me because at home during my childhood everything was done in solitary, from getting ready for the day to chores and even meals. We as a family never ate together except on special occasions. If I got all of my chores, homework or whatever it might need to be taken care of done as soon as possible so I could go to my friends’ homes where we had dinner together and family engagement. I did not mind if I needed to help the family with more work.

    7. When asked to work together on a planning task, Mexican heritage sibling pairs from immigrant families with basic experience with western schooling showed sophisticated patterns of blending their agendas by collaborating fluidly, anticipating each other’s actions and sharing leadership and exchanging roles in order to accomplish the task (Alcalá, Rogoff, & López Fraire, 2018).

      This shared task and collaboration ethic is my favorite way to work and learn. As a young adult somewhere in the multiple homes I visited I came to the conclusion that if you could not work in the kitchen together with a potential mate then that was not the person you should be dating or considering for marriage. It may sound silly however the theory has proven itself more times than I would like to count in my life, my children's lives and many friends and family. There is a bond that cannot be explained when you can work together for common goals.

    8. Nevertheless, in most middle-class communities, children are often largely segregated from adults in early childhood and instead encouraged to engage in developmentally appropriate child-focused activities (Morelli, Rogoff, & Angelillo, 2003)

      I had never experienced the segregation mentioned here growing up and as an adult at a family gathering for Thanksgiving at my in-law's dinner I was told my children would have to be seated at a different table. Children were not included at the adult table or later in activities because their belief was that children are seen not heard. This was and still is horrifying to me as a parent because I wanted the children to be with us and never had that kind of separation with my children or my family growing up. That was the only dinner I ever ate without my children unless my kids did not want to have me at the table with them and preferred someone else like the favorite Aunt and Uncle.

    9. Throughout this chapter we contrast LOPI with traditional ways of structuring school learning with teachers as transmitters of information that children soak up as they sit at their desks, in what Rogoff and her colleagues have called Assembly-Line Instruction (ALI) (Rogoff et al., 2003). Decades of research have shown that ALI is not the ideal way to structure learning (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999), but it is still common in many schools

      The Assembly-Line Instruction has been horrible for students and teachers alike. I have always learned more in the "non-traditional" ways of learning and encourage “non-traditional” learning in my classrooms. As a special education teacher and foods teacher I want my students to be successful in life not just school so I teach mostly by using activity based learning and I always remind kids it is ok for our project or food not to turn out ok because we will learn from it as long as we are putting forth an earnest effort.