the overwhelming majority of police violence is constitutional. Reforms cannot fix a policing system that is not broken.
If it's built broken, it'll stay broken.
the overwhelming majority of police violence is constitutional. Reforms cannot fix a policing system that is not broken.
If it's built broken, it'll stay broken.
After a year of militaristic ambush on the community, the consent decree provided members of the police department with mental-health services to cope with the unrest, but no treatment or restitution for the residents who were teargassed, shot with rubber bullets, and traumatized by the tanks at the edge of their driveways.
Just another way in which the wealthy and privileged get taken care of before those who desperately need it.
But the technique of murder doesn’t comfort the dead. It comforts the executioners—and all their supportive onlookers.
These same ideas being upheld and supported isn't done so by the majority, but by the rich minority.
At best, these reforms discourage certain techniques of killing, but they don’t condemn the fact of police killing.
So sad and yet so true.
Black people I know trust police; they trust them to be exactly what they always have been.
Throughout the decades, police have always played the same role towards people of color, even before the war on drugs, so why would we expect them to change now?
We never should have had police. Policing is among the vestiges of slavery, tailored in America to suppress slave revolts, catch runaways, and repress labor organizing.
Police have always been a form of racial control, but they have been tailored and altered to be in tune for the times.
In recent decades, abolitionists have developed alternatives to 911, created support systems for victims of domestic violence, prevented new jail construction, reduced police budgets, and shielded undocumented immigrants from deportation. Abolition, I learned, was a bigger idea than firing cops and closing prisons; it included eliminating the reasons people think they need cops and prisons in the first place.
This just further supports Alexander's idea that the police have simply become rich and corrupt while still managing to harm the wrong people in the process.
Brown had a funeral. Wilson had a wedding. Most police officers just continue to live their lives after filling the streets with blood and bone.
Further yet, police continue to live their lives as if the action they did was just part of their job, and not a murder.
Fifteen years later, my old neighborhood still lacks quality food, employment, schools, health care, and air—all of which increases the risk of violence and the reliance on police.
Further proves the point that these social problems need to be addressed
Reforms make police polite managers of inequality
This is a perfect way of putting it.
What if Derek Chauvin had kneeled on George Floyd’s neck for seven minutes and 46 seconds instead of eight? Maybe Floyd would have lived to be arrested, prosecuted, and imprisoned for allegedly attempting to use a counterfeit $20 bill.
The author raises are very valid point here. If George Floyde hadn't have died, would he have gotten justice? Or even any attention? Would he end up as yet another innocent person of color? Would he still be there even after the bill had been confirmed in being real?
The guard was back at work the following week.**
Unbelievable
the victim told police it had started as an argument over “something stupid.”
Imagine being the victim of such a horrendous act and still feeling the urge to defend your attacker out of fear, I can't even imagine.
I was 13
The first time I saw a dead body I was around the same age, it was also from a gun shooting.
I was scared of selling drugs, so I gambled
Most people who are in favor of the drug war still don't get it, just because selling drugs is now socially 'off limits' doesn't mean that people won't do other illegal things to get by.
without alternatives
This goes exactly along the lines of what I was saying in the summer assignment. Desperate people do desperate things, it's just that simple.
both parties share their lived experiences could go a long way to demonstrating that different racial groups don’t have to be at odds. And white Americans could engage in these types of dialogues with other white people
Summed up propositions of article.
The key to these conversations, though, is empathy. And it will take a lot of empathy — not just for one conversation but many, many conversations in several settings over possibly many years. It won’t be easy, but if we want to address some people’s deeply entrenched racial attitudes, it may be the only way
The big take away.
There’s an unfortunate lack of understanding that interactions across groups can be positive and enrich rather than divide,” Godsil said
Upholds America's original ideas, that this nation is one big melting pot.
Trump supporters are clearly worried, as the earlier study found, that white Americans are losing status in the country. But there are plenty of examples — in big, diverse cities like New York City, for example — that show they don’t have to look at race relations in a zero-sum manner in which white people lose and everyone else wins.
I never connected the dots on the fact that many Trump supports live by this idea.
examples that break stereotypes, asking them to think about people of color as individuals rather than as a group, tasking them with taking on first-person perspectives of people of color, and increasing contact between people of different races
This might not be a bad idea.
Maybe churches and schools can take on public education campaigns. Maybe these and other civic institutions can facilitate public forums in which people can openly discuss these problems
Based on how my last school was, I doubt this is going to go off without a hitch.
. White Americans need to work within their own communities to combat prejudice.Thankfully, researchers have come up with several ideas that strike the right balance.One approach is to pursue certain policies in a race-neutral manner.
This seems fair for everyone and rally's white people's support.
We could be waiting forever if we did that
These conversations are a balancing act, as for some might not work at all and others might take a lengthy amount of time.
People don’t want to be immediately dismissed because they might have a view that you consider wrong or even vile; they want to feel heard. And once that happens, it’s a lot easier for them to make mental space to understand other people’s problems
Like I said, this worked for me and my sister when we tried talking to my mom about these civil rights issues.
You can turn your political alarm system off without jeopardizing who you are and what you believe,” Hochschild told me. “And you can learn something about the person at the other end of the conversation that’s going to be of profound importance
Upholds idea that we need to start treating each other with kindness and respect if we're hoping to make any headway in these topics; Maybe what we really need to be doing is turning political issues into human's rights.
, a woman tells Hochschild about her love for conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh because he stood up to people — feminists, environmentalists, and other liberals — that she felt belittled her and her lifestyle. As the woman explained, “Oh, liberals think that Bible-believing Southerners are ignorant, backward, rednecks, losers. They think we’re racist, sexist, homophobic, and maybe fat.” She felt that these accusations overlooked many of the problems that rural white Americans faced — growing up poor, struggling to get a better education, and so on.
Belittling poor whites may be part of the problem.
Now that Gustavo is in a place where he's more open, Virginia asks him to imagine what the worst thing could happen if he used a bathroom with a transgender person. He admits he wouldn't be scared. Then comes the breakthrough."Listen, probably I was mistaken," he says of his original position on trans rights.Virginia asks him again if he'd vote in favor of banning transgender discrimination. "In favor," he says
This blew my mind. I'm curious about what the actual rates are at which people changed their minds in this study.
. "God gave me the ability to love a disabled person," he says, and that taking care of one another is why love matters."That resonate a lots with me," Virginia responds. "For me, these laws, and including transgender people are about that. They're about how we treat one another."
If we connect with those we're trying to educate, and treat them with respect, they will be more willing to listen and consider.
One key issue is that people want to feel heard before they can open their minds to other people’s points of view. “Democrats in particular need to go out of their way to reassure these groups that they are being respected, that they are being listened to,”
You would never insult someone to get your way because you it wouldn't work, so why should we do that when trying to educate those on racism?
These co-workers were sincere in their fear that the young woman might actually physically die as a result of the feedback. Of course, when news of the woman’s potentially fatal condition reached the rest of the participant group, all attention was immediately focused back onto her and away from the impact she had had on the people of color.
Good example of the struggle between POC trying to overcome discrimination, while poor, white people ignore it and try to get the attention turned back onto them.
Most Americans, white people included, want to think that they’re not capable of racism — particularly after the civil rights movement, overt racism is widely viewed as unacceptable in American society. Yet racism, obviously, still exists. And when some white people are confronted with that reality, whether it’s accusations of racism against them personally or more broadly, they immediately become very defensive — even hostile.
Many poor, white people think because there's no more 'whites only signs' that racism is a thing of the past.
These behaviors, in turn, function to reinstate white racial equilibrium.
Since poor, white people struggle on some of the same terms as people of color, most want to take any advantages they can get, even if that means it's unjust.
So when they hear accusations of racism, they feel like what they see as the “real” issues — those that afflict them — are getting neglected. This, obviously, makes it difficult to raise issues of race at all with big segments of the population, because they’re often suspicious of the motives
I literally know exactly what this article is talking about. My mom often felt this way as she was someone who didn't graduate high school, makes under $12,000 a year, meaning she doesn't have to pay taxes (since she doesn't make enough,) has been on and off food stamps, and has filed for bankruptcy twice in her life.
One can pick the facts here — particularly since black and Latino Americans still trail white Americans in terms ofwealth,income, andeducational attainment.
Poor white people's feelings can be understood but that doesn't make them fully 'right.'
. And from their perspective, people — black and brown Americans, women — are now cutting in the line, because they’re getting new (and more equal) opportunities through new anti-discrimination laws and policies like affirmative action.As a result, Hochschild told me that rural white Americans “feel like a minority group. They feel like a disappearing group. Both minority and invisible.
Their feels make sense in a way because although POC are receiving long needed aid to actively work against discrimination, low income white people are getting left in the dust. The socio-economic problems whites and POC once faced together are once again being separated based on race and having one group in the lead. (Similar to the once poor peoples movement Alexander mentioned in her book)
This is how many white Americans, particularly in working-class and rural areas, view the world today. So when they hear politicians and journalists call them racist or remind them about their privilege, they feel like elites are trying to distract from the serious problems in their lives and grant advantages to other groups of people
So is this saying we should work on calling people out for their white privilege but not shame them for their socio-economic problems?
Imagine, for example, a white man who lost a factory job due to globalization and saw his sister die from a drug overdose due to theopioid epidemic— situations that aren’t uncommon today. He tries to complain about his circumstances. But his concerns are downplayed by a politician or racial justice activist, who instead points out that at least he’s doing better than black and brown folks if you look at broad socioeconomic measures.
Does this feel like reverse racism to him? This is just another point supported by Alexander which is that it should not the color of your skin that matters, everyone can experience difficult lives
These terms don’t signal to them that they’re doing something wrong, but that their supposedly racist attitudes (which they would deny having at all) are a justification for lawmakers and other elites to ignore their problems.
White people don't understand the privileges they have
understand the perspectives of people who may qualify as racist, understanding where they come from is a needed step to being able to speak to them in a way that will help reduce the racial biases they hold
This brings up fair point. Sometimes racism is founded in one's upbringings as well as-but not as common of course-as negative real life experiences with a POC.
Very few people are stupid or irredeemably mean. They’ll listen to what you have to say if they trust you’ll listen to what they have to say back.”
We can't just bring humanity to the subjects we're talking about, but treat the people we're talking about with humanity as well.
researchers cautioned, the process of reducing people’s racism will take time and, crucially, empathy.
It will also require American's to have a real conversation about how race plays a crucial component in our society and what we can do to stop it. (according to Michelle Alexander)
That suggests there’s a lot of racism — or at least the enabling of it — in America, perhaps even more than one would think in the modern age
I truly think the election of him will been foreseen as regrettable in the not too distant future, just as it was with bush. But that's just my personal opinion.
Not only did Trump build his campaign largely on fears of immigrants and Muslims, but based ona lot of polls and surveys, he also attracted the voters who reported, by far, the highest levels of racial resentment and other prejudiced views.
It's so sad that fear of these people and ideas is considered 'scary' just because they're different.
it is clear that the prejudiced views of a lot of Americans helped elect to the White House a man who’srepeatedly made racist, offensive statements
I bet this has to do with what Michelle Alexander was talking about in her novel, how white supremacy has been historically used by politicians for swing voters; If people are made to believe that the color of their skin gives them more advantages than POC in the same economic class than them, they will vote for the person who will guarantee these race privileges.
those voters’ support forlaws that protect trans people from discriminationincreased, even when they were presented with counterarguments for such laws
This is amazing. It makes me think back on how most civil rights movements-such as gay rights, rights for POC, and women's rights- have been successful by humanizing the victims. Our generation nowadays is quick to call out older generations with 'old fashioned thinking' and insult them to their face which has been largely unsuccessful.
asked the voters to simply put themselves in the shoes of trans people — to understand their problems — through a 10-minute, nonconfrontational conversation. The hope was that the brief discussion could lead people to reevaluate their biases.
Interesting way to try and combat the stigma produced by disapprovers, it worked with my mom though.
Women are intelligent and insightful. Your perspective, too, is valuable, and I say that even if you continue to oppose feminism.But if you do, please, please understand all that feminism seeks to d
I like this part because it re-enforces the reason why the author is writing this letter. The author doesn't want to prove the subject she's writing to it 'wrong' or trying to get her to switch sides, she's simply trying to better educate her from a feminist's point of view.
And yes, as the dominant force in culture, men are probably, at some time or another, going to feel like they are under attack, or that they are not as valued. They have had almost total dominance over culture for long enough. They can put up with a few growing pains as women assert themselves into the cultural conversation.
Good in addressing men's feelings during feminist movements, but also works explains why these feelings might exists and why (no offense) they shouldn't matter.
There is not a finite amount of influence or voice in our culture, and feminism is not seeking to monopolize anything. We are just trying to assert our voice alongside the male voice and assert ourselves as valuable members of society on our own terms
Telling the subject she's writing to why feminism exists and daring to try and convince her to possibly be part of it.
The only way that we can start to reshape our own value is to assert ourselves. The only way that we can start to contributeour values to culture and society is to claim our right to do so.
This paragraph is good in comparing what women have looked like in the world in the past and what feminism works to make women look like now and in the future.
Because we as women are valuable, and our perspective is valuable, and what we have to say is valuable. Why should we let men define what makes us valuable?
Continuing to state the core ideas founded in feminism.
And I realized that I have spent years of my life doubting my worth or feeling downright worthless because I bought into the idea that my value as a woman is defined by my ability to attract a man on his terms, or on the male-dominated culture’s terms.
Screams with truth for many girls and women.
But what never changed was the culture. I continued to see this idea of a sexy, seductive, pretty personality-less woman portrayed everywhere. Most men I knew didn’t really object, and many reveled in it
Again, as Alexander points out in her novel, silence is ignorance and ignorance is acceptance.
their womanhood and femininity was reduced and used to just...sell things
As women have been used and manipulated in this way for decades.
realized how much time I wasted being concerned about whether or not I was too fat, too unattractive, too loud, too opinionated, too independent, too quirky.
Love this quote because I relate to it so much.
I don’t know if you grew up around the same kind of conversation that I did, but I totally get how you arrived at this view of feminism. It’s the one that I grew up with, too.
Author gives slack to the subject she's writing about, and proves her only point in writing this letter is in hopes of better educating the subject.
We should be able to define ourselves, to assert our value independent of a male opinion, and to claim the same rights and freedoms of men
Actual definition of feminism
They have kept women from the vote, from education, from work —even from eating unchaperoned in restaurants!
Still present in today's world with things like women needing consent from their partners to get their tubes tied. Oh and women have only been able to vote for 100 years, that's less time than both poor white men and men of color (not shaming on them, just stating the facts.)
They have taken the power of defining and valuing us as women
Creating things such as makeup, bras, heels, and razors for women which all have profited off of women's self consciousness.
For too long in Western society, male voices, perspectives, desires, and experiences have completely dominated our societies
Including but not limited too many scientific studies that have influenced our means of treatment and medicine.
Feminism aims to give a voice tofemalesand to the female experience, and to give that voice a weight equal to the voice of men.
Key word in this sentence was 'equal,' not better than! Women have been deemed second class citizens in many walks of life throughout our word's history. Feminism only proposes we stop these actions and become equal with our male counterparts.
I would also like to tell you that you are free to pay for dates!! Or at least go dutch? I mean, there is no rule saying that you cannot plan or pay for dates
Society norms such as men being chivalrous, support the patriarchal and matriarchal roles embedded in our society. Gender equality is has positive aspects to everyone.
feminists —angry, bitter women —are trying to erase male culture and villainize men. I am writing to tell you, College Girl Sitting Behind Me, that this argument misses the point
Exactly!
You talked about how you think feminists have gone too far. You think we attack men too hard, and we don’t respect their strengths, and we want to dominate society.
This is often a misconception, nonetheless, it is also a reason for both men and women to remove themselves from the stand for gender equality, particularly for women.
t all starts with you.
Puts responsibility on the reader, and makes them want to change.
rain yourself to think about sexuality this way, instead of as a commodity
Her words are very effective in making the reader not want to perpetuate rape culture.
This leads to the point that weneedto have new models in which to think about sexuality.
Change the way we think about sex, don't just use this language less.
t creates a society that is full of rape myths and rape, even though we never talk about it.It creates rape culture
Didn't even connect the dots like that, wow.
This is also the basis of the cause of the erasure of people of other identities experiencing rape
"her skirt was too short, she was asking it," "we need a dress code so boys don't get distracted when they're supposed to be learning," "but she said yes to our date," "but she didn't say no or stop," the list goes on.
Since men are encouraged to have many partners, and are thought to have uncontrollable“urges,”they are often given a free pass for the crimes that they commit.
Mens side of rape myths.
Since women’s sexuality is based on a value judgment of her worth, and certain types of women are worth more than others, victims of rape are often blamed for the crimes committed against them
Sad, but still true.
This is where the idea that men want sex and women want love, and that it’s women’s job to be the“gatekeepers”of sexuality.
I feel like since 2014, when this was written, we, as a society, have done a much better job of addressing slut shaming in girls. However, this fact, sadly, still remains to be largely true even in 2020.
here’s avery real connectionbetween how we as a society discuss sexuality and the prevalence of sexual violence
I never noticed this, I can feel my eyes being opened.
We all know approaching strangers is hard and violates a lot of social norms. That means we have to start where it’s easiest, or else this action may never come to fruition
Important point in regards to addressing and take action on this topic.
Maybe talk about it with your feminist friends about this first
Great idea!
There are a lot of ways that you can do this! Just make sure that your action plan is something youcan actually carry out
Key part of being successful in eradicating sexually violent language from your close circle.
Prepare a response that you can use when you encounter this kind of language.
Big part of one's action plan when educating others.
I know I’ve been in plenty of situations like this myself, and I would spend days thinking of witty responses that Ishouldhave used
Author sympathizing with the reader and connecting with them to be on the same level.
Think about a time when someone said or did something that was problematic and youdid nothing. How did it make you feel and why didn’t you intervene?
Very god point, re-enforces author's logos with pathos.
hat activism is all about
Teach others, little by little we can eradicate the use of this sexually violent language.
It takes on average66 daysto make or break a habit. Be patient with yourself, but also stay on track.
Addresses some of my earlier concerns.
ask them to hold you accountable for what you say.
Maybe have a buddy system to help each other out. Like I'll be having with my room mate.
Then, observe:What patterns do you see? Are you prone to using anyspecific phrases? Do you use them the most when you’re angry or upset? Do you use them more with people that you’re close to or strangers?
Don't just catch yourself using this sexually violent language, figure out the root cause behind your use of it.
Try writing down or keeping tally for a few days every time you use one of these words or phrases
How to start the process of stopping the use of this language.
Every time we use this kind of language, we are a part of the problem.
Just like when Alexander says, in her novel, how being silent and unengaged while injustices are happening to POC, white people are actively adding themselves to being part of the problem.
So how can every one of us work to stop using language derived from sexual violation?Stop Using It
Simple solution, but also makes me think it's 'easier said than done,' even as a woman who doesn't want to normalize rape culture through language.
verbal warfare
Strong diction, makes reader rethink the use of these normalized sexual assault phrases.
This language is so normalized, it’s probably part of your vocabulary, too. In fact,notusing sexual violent language is almost impossible because of how ingrained it has become.
Somewhat unrelated topic, but this comment makes me question what people who's first language isn't english think of this sexually violent language we use in everyday, casual conversations.
When we consider the fact that1-in-3 women and 1-in-6 menwill be victims of sexual violence, it’s not surprising that it is a massive focal point in our speech
Never even thought about it in that way. It makes so much sense. However, it also has me raising questions like "why do we drop in it everyday conversation like this, and yet as a society. choose not to seriously address it when it DOES happen?"
You’ve probably also noticed that that’s a lot of sexual violence.
I didn't but thank you for pointing that out.
That’s a lot of violence right there.
Yes there is.
We tellpeople to“go f*ck themselves”when we’re angry. We’ll“tear you a new one”when we’re insulting. We“force ourselves”to do a myriad of tasks,“hit on someone”when we flirt, and tell (mostly) women to“suck it”when their power is threatening to us
Never thought about it in that way, but now I am.
I defy any sentimental Southerner to defend our ancestors to me. I am quite literally made of the reasons to strip them of their laurels
Strong, strong ending. Supports the idea that her body in itself is a reason to stop supporting these confederate monuments
Either you have been blind to a truth that my body’s story forces you to see, or you really do mean to honor the oppressors at the expense of the oppressed, and you must at last acknowledge your emotional investment in a legacy of hate
This is what your support of the confederate monuments means.
To those who have embraced these delusions: Now is the time to re-examine your position.
'We know better now, so now is a time adjust your thinking.'
Moreover, she's literally telling her ancestor's history giving people room to be wrong and accept their mistakes. Not many people would do this!
Any manufactured monument to that time in that place tells half a truth at best. The ideas and ideals it purports to honor are not real.
'Do not support these people. Their honor and glory was meant for a time when people didn't know better.'
Among the apologists for the Southern cause and for its monuments, there are those who dismiss the hardships of the pas
There are those who still underestimate or disregard all the ways in which slaves were mistreated.
were built upon the grievous exploitation of black life.
'The South is the place it is today because it was built and created off the backs of slaves. Plantation rape did happen and I am scientific proof of it!'
I am not proud of the white ancestors whom I know, by virtue of my very existence, to be bad actors.
'I am a byproduct of these white confederate men and i am saying I am not proud of their actions,' so neither should you!
This is not an ignorant pride but a defiant one. It is a pride that says, “Our history is rich, our causes are justified, our ancestors lie beyond reproach.”
'By leaving these statues up, or proposing new ones to be created, we are saying we are okay with how our nation got to this point in time AND we do not have any regrets about it'
There is, however, a peculiar model of Southern pride that must now, at long last, be reckoned with
This paragraph continues to further establish author's ethos as well as gently present her idea which will be presented in the next few paragraphs.
You cannot say it wasn’t my family members who fought and died. My blackness does not put me on the other side of anything. It puts me squarely at theheart of the debate.
The author is a byproduct of both sides of the argument! This fact now raises the idea that she might be even more qualified to express her opinion on the confederate statue topic than most people.
I am not an outsider who makes these demands. I am a great-great-granddaughter
Establishes author's own ethos
who dares to tell me to celebrate them?
The word 'dares' holds the most power in this sentence. Also works to enforce idea 'why should i celebrate them after what they did to me and my people?!'
The black people I come from were owned by the white people I come from. The white people I come from fought and died for their Lost Cause.
All of my ancestors have been affected or subjected by the confederate war (civil war.)
My body and blood are a tangible truth of the South and its past.
Again, reinforces the point that confederate monuments are not needed because she like many other POC living today are walking, talking confederate monuments.
took what they wanted from women they did not love, over whom they had extraordinary power, and then failed to claim their children.
Explains why the author has no "white people in... [her] genealogy in living memory." This fact in itself shows how powerful, white men of this time period took advantage of African American slaves, only to leave them with the mess THEY made to be 'cleaned up.'
No. Voluntary. Whiteness. I am more than half white, and none of it was consensual.
The syntax of this sentence is so strong I feel like I myself am enduring the pain she feels.
As far as family history has always told, and as modern DNA testing has allowed me to confirm, I am the descendant of black women who were domestic servants and white men who raped their help
The effect the words, "white men who raped their help," works to further instill a sense of compassion and empathy out of the reader far more than just the description a "black women."Her wording here is so effective because it better portray's her ancestor's humanity in a time when people of color were not seen as whole human beings.
Go back one more generation and it gets less straightforward, and more sinister.
Her descriptive language is so effective and strong!
My very existence is a relic of slavery and Jim Crow.
Again, powerful imagery! Makes the reader actually hear and understand her pain not only as a person of color, but as a Mulatta (a person mixed white and black ancestry.) She didn't have to be alive during the times of slavery to know the pain of her ancestors, because she still feels and endures this pain with ever breathe and step she takes in life.
cartoonishprivatestatues, solemn public monuments
The words 'cartoonish' and 'solemn' paint contrasting images, but together work to describe how foolish these heros' of war look from a person of color's perspective
I say it is not a matter of “airbrushing” history, but of adding a new perspective
Excellent point. Too many American's today want to continue the ideas of the cold war propaganda that the US is still and always been 'the best nation in the world.' They want to gleam over our nation's past mistakes and embarrassing truths only to prove and uphold this message.
I have rape-colored skin
Paints a strong, vivid picture. Very effective in proving her argument
The black people I come from were owned and raped by the white people I come from. Who dares to tell me to celebrate them?
Since the beginning of our nation's history, African Americans have always been subject to repression and control. However, it all started with the exploitation of slaves for free labor. Overall, what the author is saying is 'I in my existence, along with my ancestors before me, are all confederate monuments. Our suppression throughout history and the struggles we still face to this day are all a result of your confederate ideas, you don't need a statue, and I don't want one, to prove you won"