From when the essay was published, they got the prediction right about how this will become a bigger topic, expanding to other nations and how they will handle this crisis.

This conclusion includes the "stakes" portion of what should be needed. It connects to todays wars going on, focusing on how if we ignore this problem change will not happen easily.

I really value how this essay feels very formal and academic, not allowing room for any info that would be unnecessary.

This transition is great, allowing the reader to feel the impact of what was before being destroyed.

I really like how the author goes through different periods to establish their argument. Although in some cases it may not be reliable to do so, this argument adds up, being coherent with each other body paragraph.

Before diving into the main argument, the author makes sure to establish a foundation for the audience, allowing them to be more integrated with the topic.

Instead of using direct quotes from peer-reviewed articles, the author takes the information, rewording it to the audience in a more understandable level.

Starting from the introduction, the author establishes their argument with confidence, knowing there is plenty of evidence throughout the entire essay to support their defense.