comments can give frequent openings to hackers
I am teaching CISC 3325 ("Information Security") in Fall 2023. "Hacking" is defined as "gaining an unauthorized access to a tool/website," but in the given scenario, the only difference between monitored websites and ones that aren't monitored (as long as the users can't change the code behind the original webpage) is that anyone can post any comments they won't, so people are, by definition, authorized to comment on websites. As such, the rates of hacking a monitored webpage or one that isn't monitored shouldn't be significantly different. Given so, should the word "hackers" remain in this article?