This is not merely an issue of identity politics.
This is a use of logos that falls flat as soon as you examine it for more than five seconds. This entire thing is an exercise in extreme identity politics. This author recognizes that an easy way to undercut an argument is to make it up front and take it our of your detractors mouth, but it doesn't counter the fact that they have not cited a single concrete example, choosing to talk entirely in hypothetical. This is so disappointing considering the strong opening sequence of their protest. Change occurs in the real world, not in our mind palaces. All they've done is parse apart relatively insignificant micro-aggressions in a way that damages the unified front against macro-aggressions. Using #LatinoLivesMatter is solidarity, and the author hasn't made a truly compelling argument why that wouldn't be the case that doesn't rely on conjecture or highly questionable subjective conclusions.