With the ability to remain anonymous, people will most likely post something borderline horrific or something that near violating the policy without any consequences. This also leads to cyberbullying and exposes the personal information of other people without that person knowing.

I want to add that there are also other ways that people used to share news and updates. Commonly, people would send mail and letters, but some would use carrier pigeons to tie a letter on their ankle to send out messages. Additionally, there are also the Bellmen who will stand in the middle of the town and yell out the current news and updates.

Data constraint plays a really important role in many social media platforms as they help set realistic boundaries when a person fills out their personal information. This also helps companies keep a record of what age the users usually are that uses their social media. Moreover, it all help prevent any possible trolls who will put random informations just to use the social media.

The pixels that only have three color components have always made me really curious, as there is only green, blue,e and red, ed but once they are in a group,oup tcane to create a whole new different color that sometimes seems impossible. Additionally, one of the most intruiging thing about these grids is that with only these three colors, they can create the color white.

I believe it is crucial to analyze the intentions of the various people involved, as they are the root of how a bot behaves online. This also draws back to the fact that all actions made by the bots should be traced back to the programmers, as bots are not autonomous and do not know the difference between right and wrong; only the people who are giving them instructions know.

In addition to bots that were made to spam advertisements or as a way for influencers to gain more followers, some bots can help some influencers gain more recognition. Aside from just followers, some will buy bots just to comment on their posts or share them, which can make them seem more popular, leading them to appear on more people's feeds and social media, thus gaining more real-life followers.

I would like to disagree on this because posting about their good news and manipulating their photo are two different things. While one states something that actually happened, manipulating photos is just being deceptive. Additionally, who would actually post about their bad news, given the fact that they might get made fun of by other people, and a majority of those would not receive consequences.

While these ethics have good intentions, they often do not result in a harmonious society. The reason is that it gives those specific people a lot of power and authority, and people would abuse that authority for their own needs. But since people want to be seen as exemplary people and don't want to disrupt society, they would not dare to question or go against those specific people