This happened a lot on CSI: Miami. In one episode, the crime was committed by someone who was made to be the good guy.

One example of a show that has shown both would be CBS's The Rookie, in which they show how cops arrest someone, and an evil lawyer frees them. The Rookie shows good representation of both.

CSI: Miami is very similar to them, showing the crime, but instead of panning to a shot of Miami, they have the character at different locations with real names. While also showcasing some forensic stuff as well.

This a very true. When CSI: Miami was running, and people watched the use of forensic science, jurors started to ask for it as well. The show had shaped the minds of people.

As of today, there are a total of 5 CSI shows, including CSI, NY, and CSI: Miami, and the original CSI. The two spin off CSI: Vegas, only ran for 3 seasons, and CSI: Cyber only ran for a season.

They do this by playing music or doing the lighting in a certain way.

This is very true because in TV shows, you can do many things, but in movies, there has to be a clear beginning and ending due to their limited time.

This statement is false because there are a bunch of non-fiction films that are still being produced, but instead of broadcasting, they also put them on streaming services like Hulu and Netflix, because not everyone has cable nowadays.

Back in the day, storytelling was much different from what it is nowadays. If you were to ask an older person, they'll tell you how modern TV storytelling isn't that good. But ask a younger person, they'll tell you why TV shows were much better due to the new techniques shows tried.

Back in the day, storytelling was much different from what it is nowadays. If you were to ask an older person, they'll tell you how modern TV storytelling isn't that good. But ask a younger person, they'll tell you why TV shows were much better due to the new techniques shows tried.

One example is the TV show Frasier. They updated the quality and releasing the older episodes. They also have remade shows like Frasier, but they weren't as successful as the original show was.

How big was the shift, and how notable was it?

This is very true nowadays, as you go to a basketball game and it's a blowout, but the next time you attend a game, it could end with a buzzer beater. You don't know what could happen.

Nowadays, everything is online, so if you. missed the play while it was in the theater, you go on YouTube or some streaming website and find it for free or pay a small fee to do so.

I think it's very noticeable nowadays with "doom scrolling" and how one video can draw you in, and when you break out of the cycle, you notice how much time had truly passed due to how natural the flow was between each video, and ad.

I wonder how they reengage the concept of flow. Did they talk to a bunch of people, or was it just based on one person's experience?

Nowadays, comedy is a very big genre. A lot of big TV shows choose to mix comedy with other things to make it more interesting, like The Big Bang Theory.

In a crime show magazine, they might show different celebrities' news, or might show other genres to help attract a broader audience to their magazine. It makes sense to show both to increase the attraction.

This concept of ideal traits helps movie directors and set builders make a perfect set. If they didn't have a set of traits, then it would be somewhat difficult to establish the ideal set in place. In love story films, a generic element could be a tragedy.

This remains true to this day; TV shows are often categorized into one main category, with subcategories such as drama or crime.

In modern TV shows, they often align with many different types of genres, like crime and comedy, like Brooklyn Nine-Nine. Another example of a TV show having multiple genres is S.W.A.T., which is crime and drama. Often, types mix well with each other.

We can see these being true on this day of day but with kids and iPads, iPhones, and game devices.

Back then, people were just getting used to owning a TV, and what was on might not have been that good. However, nowadays, some people have TVs in every room of their home. They can be used for various purposes, such as playing video games or engaging in other forms of entertainment.

This is still true nowadays as well. Dedicated programs are going over different stocks. As well as they play ads to make up cost they are losing by making it free for everyone.

This isn't very true nowadays. Most people have Bluetooth and other devices that they could use to listen to whatever kind of podcast, news, or music they want. Back then, you listened to whatever was on.

What was the other side? We see one side of the argument, but they don't show what other people had to say. Did the other side of the argument not make sense, or what was the issue?

Nowadays, these expand into the world. When I go out see kids and some adults watching TV while eating or shopping.

This is very true because nowadays everyone has a device, and everyone can watch TV at their own time. This helps show that you live a very normal life, and to the people who don't live in America, when they imagine American homes, they see a TV and devices.to watch on.

This is very true in many different households, but this can also cause issues between them, like what TV shows to watch or other small things, which could ruin a family's strength.

How bad could it be that his mother would not allow him to get closure? Why does Jim have to beg his father for him instead of his father helping right away?

What guilt has he been holding on to that he needs to confess it his parent about. What is the need for the TV to be in the shot as well?