reviewers can sometimes accurately guess the identity of an author.
This seems crazy to me but I guess in a small enough population this makes sense.
9 Matching Annotations
- Last 7 days
-
-
-
Providing clear DEI statements
Say it with your chest
-
nterpreted as issues of bias was an emphasis on being constructive
sarcastically of course it was...
-
A sample review specific to science education is included as a resource for reviewers. JRST (2021) also includesa DEI statement:
Where does the white/male author fit into this? It is important to know when to step-up and when to step-back
-
As with all other journals,formatting expectations and the logistics of the submission process are also well‐described.
Does seeing well known authors cited make it more likely to publish? If so this seems very echo chambery
-
DISCUSSION
What about female/male coauthorship?
-
eaving the authors'experiences
Mixed-methodology
-
female faculty in these positions report spending more time onteaching than research in a typical week whereas men report more time doing research than teaching (Rissleret al.,2020), men being more likely to proactively negotiate with coauthors for the prestigious authorship position(West et al.,2013), bias in peer review toward manuscripts where men occupy the prestigious authorship position
Interesting
-
PUBLISHING AND THE PEER‐REVIEW PROCESS
I am wondering how often authors reuse sources without efficacy, as in they siting in a previous article and this is similar so they site it again. I am also wondering how often this leads to an echo chamber recycling the same ideas.
-