159 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. the emerging field of social-emotional learnin

      In 2017, this seems like a bold claim, but yes, I guess in the grand scheme of things, the last 50 years is a recent time frame relative to the education of people since the beginning of time.

    2. 62 females, 90 males; mean age ± S.D. =21.1 ± 7.5 years

      This doesn't make sense to me. 21.1 +/- 7.5 would mean that one standard deviation covers 14-28 year olds. That seems like a very young age to be one standard, meaning there are also younger?

    3. isualizing models in compelling wayscan make analytics data straightforward for non-specialists to observe and understand.

      Key point from our interview with an evaluator in another class.

    4. analyze log traces in an online learning sessionto make inferences about students’motivational orientations.

      Again, as a school counselor, I often check log traces in our online learning platform. Last week, a student completed a 17-chapter health class in 8 hours.

    5. United States

      Again, as a school counselor, this is a vast oversimplification, as there is no direct mandate for us; however, ASCA, the overarching governing body, has incredibly clear goals and methodologies for this.

    6. Furthermore, Moffitt et al. (2011) find that the emotional skill of self-control inchildhood is associated with better physical health, less substance dependence, betterpersonal finances, and fewer instances of criminal offending in adulthood.

      As flawed as the marshmallow test was, this has been evident for a very long time in a myriad of studies.

    7. shocked not only artificial intelligenceexperts, who thought such an event was 10 to15 years away, but also educators,

      At the rate of scientific advancement, why was this surprising to some? Also, as an educator, technologies always create new jobs; it has been like this since the dawn of time. The first tractor, conveyor belts, phones, computers, the list goes on, and so do the jobs.

  2. Mar 2026
    1. This bias makes it likely that theinstructors are more aware of research-based teaching practicesand resources than the average instructor.

      Crazy that basic instructional best practices cause better outcomes. Who would have thought it?

    2. Society’s educational debts before instruction were largeenough that women and Black men’s average posttest scoresdid notreach the White men’s average pretest scores.

      How much more proof needs to be provided? This is ridiculous data, but when presented, it is often viewed as radically outside of the norms

    3. We used the overall gain from pre- to postinstruction tointerpret the size of the educational debts. We reasoned thatthe average shift over one semester provided context forinterpreting the educational debts. To account for uncertaintyin the model, we used the standard error for each predictedscore. An overlap between one standard error barsapproximately produces ap-value of 0.05 for a one-sidedttest. However, we did not use overlap as a binary indicator ofsignificance

      There are so many different ways to do this. I guess we have to pick something, but anytime we use central tendencies, we lose outlier data that can be very important and more often than not causes further underrepresentation of BIPOC populations.

    4. To clean the data, we removed the pretest or posttest score

      Important for me to remember for my work, but also any time you hear someone "cleaned the data," it brings up questions about raw data.

    5. Critical race theory (CRT) began in the 1970s43−45to addresssocial injustices and racial oppression. CRT emphasizesexamining oppressive power structures, challenging the ideasof objectivity, and considering the intersectionality ofindividual’s identities.45

      Important to remember what was done first and when.

    6. howed that men had higher self-efficacy for chemistryconcepts and chemistry tasks than women.

      Self-efficacy is my area of research, so very interesting.

    7. to determine what inequities incontent knowledge existed before and after introductory collegechemistry courses.

      See previous comment.

      TY for the definition.

    1. 658.8298 (197.9638)2001600Critical reading632.7423 (213.6140)

      I immediately checked our grad requirements when I saw these numbers. District 11 requires MAT 470 and ENG 480 scores as a method (not the only, but one of) to graduate.<br /> MAT 658 +- 197 = 460-855 & <br /> ENG 632 +- 213 = 419-845

    2. That is, greater levels of familial support produced better outcomes that contributed to student persistence

      Similar to financial aid, supported students do better. Therefore, we need to better support students.

    3. financial aidstatus alsoimpacted persistenceearly on in their programs

      Clearly, if kids cannot afford to go to school, then many of them will not go to school.

    4. students’ ethnicity, gender, SAT mathematics score, and GPA, all significantly predicted STEM persistencefor BIPOC students

      As much as I hate it, standardized tests in academia do predict some outcome data. Granted, the lens of that outcome data varies wildly, but right now, what is our alternative to the SAT? COVID, unfortunately, proved that SAT numbers are a bigger predictor than we would have liked.

    5. is the effect of incomeand generational status, aswomen with higher income were more likely to exhibit positive outcomes in STEM

      I am glad they gave a reference here because I felt like this was a disjointed piece. This is the first and only mention of generational status in this paper.

    6. men make approximately 22% more in salary than women after graduation

      This feels like obfuscation, or purposeful misuse of data, like we have been reading about. We all know that women make less than men in the same job with the same qualifications, but from other research I've read, I thought these numbers were closer in the STEM field than in the general population. I could be wrong, but I'd love to see this specific data.

    7. Implications for future research and practitionerssuggest further attention needs to be paid to Black first-generation studentsin STEM

      This is a good look at intersectionality.

    1. subheadings that matched our research questions: Positionality Statements, Community Input, Racial/Ethnic Categories, White Reference Groups, New Approaches, and Interpretations.

      Interesting structure that I want to remember for my own writings.

    2. (Crenshaw 2010

      We see this citation come up a lot, and I think we have read it, but I did not find it in my cache of research that I have saved.

    3. Applying QuantCrit is reckoning with the racist structures that have existed and exist, and examining your role in them

      And in some cases (like mine), examining how we have benefited from and how we can change the narrative for future generations.

    1. Random sampling from a population of interest is often the preferred approach to ensure that findings are gen-eralizable, and deviations from a random sample can recon-figure and obfuscate the population being represented.

      It feels like, at times, random sampling of a specific population is still not super "random." In theory if I sampled 250 students from my school, that sample would be VERY different than 250 students from neighboring Cheyanne Mountain high school. I wonder what the bell curve would look like?

    2. Careful consideration of who is included in that n is a suggested practice in QuantCrit (Castillo & Gillborn, 2022).Other opportunities to unpack the math arise and illumi-nate ways in which biases, inequities, and hasty generaliz

      It is frustrating that this document is not the same document in the files of the canvas shell. They are very similar with some slight semantic differances that seem quite meaningful. Check these words in the other document.

    3. This understanding should be embodied in the classroom and is not something to be added to or subtracted from a lesson. CQL, in essence, contextualizes quantitative education

      !

    4. aim of social transformation

      This had me thinking about the claim, "College is brain washing our youths!" As in this is a singular piece of literature in a stack of millions yet the narrative is that this is what all of higher education is saying. More higher education needs to say this but does not. The hypocrisy in the previous claim is blatant and makes me irate.

    5. Baez argued that critical research is inherently political and that critical scholars must consider the privilege and authority that their words carry in their capacity to liberate and to oppress.

      Important for me to remember as a cisgender, heterosexual, white, male

    6. Psychometrics and intelligence testing,

      I literally hate this so much..."my son is a genius, he took this test on facebook and proved it so bend over backwards for him and give him this grade in this class that he didn't earn. it is clearly the instructor's fault"...

    7. I produced this manuscript from the position of numerous privileged social identities, including that of being a cisgen-der, heterosexual, White male.

      I dislike the capitalization of the word "White." In previous reading, we looked at why Black is often capitalized and in purposeful rebellion, that other author did not capitalize white.

    8. I write in the first person to underscore the personal and subjective nature of this statement.

      It also feels like a buck to the system to write in the first person.

    9. This manuscript is structured as follows. In accordance with good practices of CritQuant and QuantCrit, I first offer a positionality statement to situate myself, my influences, and my biases within the context of this manuscript (Castillo & Gillborn, 2022; Diemer et al., 2023). Second, I discuss the history of quantitative methods to motivate the need for CQL. Third, I introduce the emerging fields of QuantCrit and CritQuant by providing supporting scholarship and tenets. Fourth, I suggest five fundamental considerations for developing CQL: definitions, mathematics, assumptions, design, and language. Examples of how each may appear in statistics classrooms are provided. Fifth, I differentiate CQL from CritQuant and QuantCrit and suggest the role of CQL in supplementing these two quantitative frameworks. Finally, I conclude with thoughts on the scope of CQL and its potential impact on educational scholarship.

      This is well said and a good model for formatting literature.

    10. Data literacy schol-ars have also called for social justice around the production and consumption of data

      It does feel as though we are moving this direction.

    11. quantitative methods are often taught under the implicit assumptions that the methods are objective, and the numbers speak for themselves.

      Clearly, we are learnign they do not speak for themselves.

    12. ong others, the emerging fields of CritQuant (critical quantitative studies) and QuantCrit (quantitative critical race theory; both articulated below)

      I am glad they articulated the difference. I had highlighted this asking what the specific diferance is.

    1. 1)

      Ope, there's a list, better highlight! -Classically trained white guy doing what he was conditioned to do by people who decided what was important to learn/memorize.

    2. Therefore, we encourage the use of other metrics to capture the academic preparation of students

      As a school counselor, assisting students in getting into college. THIS

    3. even though research has shown that they are weak and inadequate predic-tors of college retention for racially minoritized students

      They see it and choose to ignore it.

    4. igh school GPA and college course work are better indicators of a students’ prior academic preparation, especially for marginalized and minoritized students.

      High school GPA and college coursework are better indicators because they represent a student's ability/willingness to do work. Standardized tests examine a student's ability to play "the game."

    5. Additionally, centering individual demographic variables (e.g., race, gender, and ability) instead of structural inequities positions marginalized and minoritized students as solely responsible for their lack of representation in STEM fields. These unrecognized beliefs can lead to misinterpreta-tions of people’s experiences, which in turn negatively affects campus decision making and policies (Sultana, 2007).

      I find it super interesting that three of us highlighted different yet adjacent pieces of work

    6. Consequently, the prioritization of individuals from privileged groups in STEM has produced research and pol-icies that are susceptible to the structural inequities and personal biases that have historically harmed and excluded marginalized and minoritized communities.

      It is a vicious circle that is self-feeding

    7. We argue that engaging in critical research is an effort to re-center the students, to create safer and healthier environ-ments for them to pursue their passions.

      Retweet

    8. uity efforts in STEM, many of whom aim to increase the rep-resentation of marginalized and minoritized students in STEM fields for the betterment of our institutions and the U.S. econ-omy

      A noble cause, but the economy is also deeply and systemically biased

    9. (Bell, 1995; hooks, 2000; Watson, 2005; Siebers, 2008; Mignolo, 2012). The common theme in these theoretical perspectives is their assertion that society has produced oppressive structures

      Great seminal works, I think we have read most of them through our program, so it is cool to see them repeatedly brought up in the literature.

    10. breaks down when study-ing human experiences.

      Objectivity is inherently missing when people start analyzing other people. There are always inherent biases.

    11. Nonetheless, we all identify with and embrace the need for our fields and institutions to continually improve research and deci-sion making aimed at tackling campus inequalities and injustices.

      This is good verbiage that I will retain and use.

    12. (the authors)

      I have noticed that I am often overly critical of the grammar/sentence structure of published papers. Here I was thinking, is this "We" clarification needed?

    1. QuantCrit researchers also strive to develop research teams with diverse experiences, perspectives, and identities.

      I wrote about this in the discussion this week.

    2. Counter-narratives represent the experiences and perspectives of minoritized people and often contradict our culture’s dominant narratives

      Again, socially constructed. So someone's social construct of their life is clearly important because that construct was influenced by every lived interaction they have had.

    3. identities as being socially constructed and fluid.

      Following on asomsky, everything is a social concept. It blows my mind when someone says, "They just can't choose to be X." Yes, they can. Your narrow mind dictates that only X can be X, but in reality, X is whatever someone says it is

    4. o interpret quantitative findings as objective facts.

      Again, this is probably intentional on some researhcers behalf because they know how readers will interpret it.

    5. Researchers often fail to adequately discuss the biases introduced in data collection and analysis methods

      This is both commonplace and often intentionally used to prove a point. Which is not good.

    1. It is a scandal that ethnic minoritykids are more likely to go to university than poor white ones’

      Literally have told [white] students to stop talking. As a counselor, when I hear, "Well, I am a white kid named George Clandestine the III, of course it is going to be harder for me..." I reframe with "You are literally going to be successful in likely anything you do because of the place of privilege you come from, do not play the victim when the tables are simply close to even because they do not favor you enough..."

    2. both race andsocial class simultaneously

      What a wild concept...

      The top students will always be the top students. High Achiever High School is only a high-achieving school because of the resources. If you take those same students and place them in Low Acheiver High School, they are still going to perform very well.

      A common theme in Colorado Springs is that students at Cheyanne Mountain High School achieve much higher than those at Coronado High School; it is a better school. I would argue that if you put those exact same kids at Coronado, they would achieve just as high. But the fact of the matter is that the SES of Cheyenne is much higher than that of Coronado. So is it a better school issue or is it that students with more resources achieve higher issue?

    3. those in power when they appear to lend authoritative ‘scientific’ backing to a favoured stereotype.

      How many times have we heard that black people are in prison at a higher rate because they commit crimes at a higher rate, or that they come from broken families, etc...

    4. ‘Crime Statistics Bureau’ doesn’t exist

      This sounds like something straight out of ChatGPT where it just makes stuff up. I would not be surprised if he literally asked an AI for some statistics and posted.

  3. Feb 2026
    1. Yet large “leaks” in the metaphorical STEM pipeline likely occur by early child-hood in the U.S.

      This is well worded and has strong imagery

    2. A practical implication of these findings is that factors present before kindergarten may largely explain racial and ethnic underrepresentation in STEM.

      Implied, but not studied, indicating further study is required

    3. However, the study’s antecedent, opportunity, and pro-pensity factors do not fully explain the observed racial dis-parities.

      Limitations, what wasn't conferred.

    4. Asian students were initially less likely than White students to display advanced science achieve-ment in kindergarten (i.e., 7% versus 16%, respectively). Asian students then were more likely than White students to display advanced science achievement by fifth grade (i.e., 16% versus 13%, respectively).

      I wonder how much familial + social pressures played into this? i.e. "The Model Minority"

    5. We used White, non-Hispanic students as the reference group

      Are they saying this was the baseline they used to compare? As in, they just assumed it was the standard, or this was the standard simply because of circumstances?

    6. Internalizing Problem Behaviors subscale consisted of four items (i.e., is the child lonely, sad, anxious, or displays low self-esteem). Problem behavior frequency was rated using a four-point response scale ranging from “never” to “very often.” Higher scores indicated that the behavior occurred more frequently. The internal consistency reliability coefficients for the externalizing and internalizing problem behaviors scales were .89 and .78, respectively (Tourangeau et al., 2019)

      Very cool, as this aligns with the research I am interested in. Mirrors it in a way.

    7. he science achievement measure was designed to assess a student’s understanding about the physical, life, and Earth and space sciences as well as scientific inquiry. The mathe-matics achievement measure was designed to assess a stu-dent’s conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, and problem solving. The mathematics achievement measure included items on number sense, properties, and operations; measurement; geometry and spatial sense; data analysis, sta-tistics, and probability; and patterns, algebra, and functions. The reading achievement measure was designed to assess basic reading skills (e.g., print familiarity), vocabulary, and reading comprehension

      It would have been nice to see data supporting these subgroupings.

    8. item response theory (IRT)

      Also, it's cool that I will be using IRT. Used to determine if the distances from 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, & 4-5 are mathematically the same on a Likert-type scale.

    9. Emergent literacy (α = .57) was a standardized composite score of five items related to literacy activities. The first three items assessed the frequency of parents engaging in book reading and picture book reading with the child as well as the child reading outside school. The last two items reported the number of books that their child owned and how long the parent spent on reading to their child. We added standardized scores of the first three items and the last two items to obtain the standardized composite score

      Cool to see this in practice. My research turns self-efficacy into several different subgroups in a similar fashion.

    10. attrition

      Can you measure, for example, all 1st graders in a district, then the following year, all 2nd graders, 3rd, 4th, etc... and just assume that with a large sample size, the data is apples to apples?

    11. Hypothesis 1: Based on prior work examining the early onset and relative stability of racial or ethnic achievement disparities (e.g., Morgan et al., 2016; Von Hippel et al., 2018), we hypothesized that Black, Hispanic, or AINAPI students would be less likely than White students to dis-play advanced science or mathematics achievement during elementary school in unadjusted analyses. We expected the observed differences to be large (Morgan et al., 2016; Plucker & Peters, 2016; Rambo-Hernandez et al., 2019). We hypothesized that Black, Hispanic, or AINAPI stu-dents would be less likely than White students to display advanced levels of science or mathematics achievement by the end of kindergarten and throughout elementary school (Freyer & Levitt, 2004; Rambo-Hernandez et al., 2019; Von Hippel et al., 2018).

      This feels like a strong hypothesis that was well written.

    12. Use of universal screen-ing using standardized measures

      But also, we know students are already overtested, and even so, these tests are often heavily biased to favor the dominant group.

    13. Research Question 1: Are Black, Hispanic, or AINAPI students less likely than White students to display advanced science or mathematics achievement during elementary school? If so, how large are the observed gaps

      This feels off. A big difference between research and evaluation is that research asks few, specific, and concise questions while evaluations go for as much bang for your buck. This first research question looks like it is stretched to thin by having two questions attached to it.

    14. Among antecedent, opportunity, and propensity factors, propensity factors most strongly predict student achievement

      The cliche nature vs nurture argument comes to mind here...

    15. lead poisoning, environmental pollutants,

      It will be microplastics for future generations.

      Lead, asbestos, microplastics, it's all the same thing regirgitated for future generations.

    16. Black, Hispanic, and AINAPI students are more likely to experience concentrated poverty that results in fewer learn-ing opportunities and corresponding racial and ethnic achievement disparities during school because of histori-cally racialized policies and practices as well as ongoing residential and community segregation

      Viscious cycle..

    17. (Fryer & Levitt, 2004; Henry et al., 2020; Morgan et al., 2016; National Assessment of Educational Progress [NAEP], 2015, 2020; Navarro et al., 2012; Reardon & Galindo, 2009; Von Hippel et al., 2018).

      Clearly evident and well researched in the literature.

    18. 2.6 percentage point increase in publica-tions, a 4.3 percentage point increase in citations, and a .03

      2.6 and 4.3 feel signficant but 0.03 feels like a reach unless I am misunderstanding this.

    1. A thoughtful program can prepare students to be consumers of research, but also be able to access and analyze data to improve their organizations.

      But also, how do we get this message across to the lay person, because as much as we learn this unless we communicate it well politics will not change. Politics are often optics and semantics, so we must learn how to use this data to speak in a manner that is heard. It took 10 years for the TEA stuff to begin to be corrected and that was blatant misuse of data.

    2. First, we encourage individual faculty in educational leadership and policy preparation programs to emphasize through course-work both basic data analytic techniques, such as those presented here, and basic quantitative research concepts.

      Shoutout to literally this class existing

    3. Past research links poverty concentration to higher rates of special education enroll-ments

      Hawaii and California are richer states so they have more money but less students in special education. The cylce keeps turning...

    4. From 2003-2004 to 2016-2017, special education enrollment fell by 32,000 students, while statewide enrollment grew by approximately one million.

      Literal jaw drop... outlandish numbers of disproportionate prejudices..

    5. Educational leaders are thus uniquely positioned to draw on data in their local settings to monitor equity issues pertaining to special education students and other historically underserved groups.

      But also how often do we see leaders who lose sight of the children? I have seen many a leader climbing the ladder at the expense of marginalized communities. I have also seen good leaders but data is a double edged sword.

    6. which found that the Texas Education Agency systematically denied students special education services

      We read studies about what/how Texas drastically lessoned thier special education numbers and it is crazy to think they basically stopped identifitying students for special education based on a govenor's individual beliefs...

    1. to change the discourse. If we can control the discourse, we can contr

      Who controls the narrative? How do we control it? Politics feels like a war of optics and the left seems to need a recalibration.

    2. health and well-being. Thus, the poverty that exists in one part of the world is related to the affluence in another part. Similarly, the poverty that exists on one side of town is related to the affluence and

      How do we say this? What language do we need to use for people to hear us?

    3. People have literally died for education, yet we keep hearing that certain families do not value it

      People have literally died for it, that is how important it is. The hypocrisy in the highlighted statement is deafening.

    4. mplies, "If you come to school not reading you get treated as if you have no right to be in sc

      Following up on what Fagana said, I find it interesting that there is such a dichotamy between "They should learn that at school" vs "They should learn that at home." That type of thinking is a lose-lose mentatlity, and allows both the school and parents to cope out of responsibility. Sex ed for example, I have had many example of parents saying "the school has no right to teach my child about sex ed", and then the parent procedes to NOT teach the child about sex ed....

    5. students' parents were less likely to have transportation to travel across the city or that it was not particularly safe for Black people to be found in the school's neighborhood after d

      Many schools offer additional "voluntary" support and call it tier 1 support. anything that is voluntary is automatically tier 2 because it is not given to the whole school. Saying you "offered it" is not good enough when some families literally cannot attend for a myriad of reasons. Tier 1 means the ENTIRE school gets access. Voluntary opportunities are opportunites for the privledged.

    6. place students' academic struggles in the larger context of social failure including health, wealth, and funding gaps that impede their school success.

      Still thinking about the comment made that SAT does not predict post-secondary success but rather it predicts future earned income potential.

  4. Jan 2026
    1. ages of fourteen and twenty-four made up only 4.7 percent of thecity’s population, they accounted for 40.6 percent of the stop-and-friskchecks by police. More than 90 percent of those stopped were innocent.

      Flagrant bias and misuse of power

    2. A University of Marylandstudy showed that in Harris County, which includes Houston,prosecutors were three times more likely to seek the death penalty forAfrican Americans, and four times more likely for Hispanics, than forwhites convicted of the same charges

      WMD

    3. Sometimes these blind spots don’t matter. When we ask Google Mapsfor directions, it models the world as a series of roads, tunnels, andbridges. It ignores the buildings, because they aren’t relevant to the task.When avionics software guides an airplane, it models the wind, the speedof the plane, and the landing strip below, but not the streets, tunnels,buildings, and people.

      Relativity

    4. Maybe they predicted that a left-handed reliever would give up lots of hitsto right-handed batters—and yet he mowed them down

      Do random 'statistical anomalies' need us to change the model? Repetition seems important in this case.

    5. managers now knowprecisely where every player has hit every ball over the last week, over thelast month, throughout his career, against left-handers, when he has twostrikes, and so on

      There are arguments to be had about if athletes are getting better or technology/data is getting better. I tend to nearly always see it as technology and data. Look at the suits Michael Phelps wore when he broke Olympic records in '04, & '08. There are reasons that those suits are now banned in competitive swimming.

    6. Rhee developed a teacherassessment tool called IMPACT, and at the end of the 2009–10 schoolyear the district fired all the teachers whose scores put them in thebottom 2 percent. At the end of the following year, another 5 percent, or206 teachers, were booted out

      I was having a discussion with a 30-year teacher who is beloved in our school and about to retire. That teacher is mentoring a new teacher who is in his third year [last year of probationary teaching in Colorado] of teaching. The younger teacher was assigned a mentor because his performance scores have been quite low these last two years.

      All that to say myself and the veteran teacher believe that MOST teacher assessment tools used in the school are used as punitive measures and excuses to let people go.

    1. using these algorithms called humans that are really biased,

      Humans are a conglomeration of our experiences, are algorithms anything more than their total inputs?

    2. 200 million people in the United States each year

      In a bucket this big, it is no wonder "one-size algorithms" don't fit all. Big data often uses algorithms to cut corn and the O'Neil video spoke to how the algorithms are produced causing inequalities while cutting these corners.

    1. basically, well-meaning liberal white people—are part of the problem in struggling for social justice.

      It is an incredibly important position to know when to step-up or know when to step back. Step up in the face of oppression to point out the wrong but step back so as to not overpower the voices of the oppressed.

    2. But forces of oppression can be difficult to detect when you benefit from them (we call this a privilege hazard later in the book).d-undefined, .lh-undefined { background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) !important; }.d-08965af7-15f0-4167-901a-aa80e2b72f3c, .lh-08965af7-15f0-4167-901a-aa80e2b72f3c { background-color: var(--pubpub-active-discussion-highlight-color, rgba(45, 46, 47, 0.5)) }2Yolanda Yang, Jillian McCarteng the choices you make (or don’t get to make) each day. These systems of power are as real as rain. But forces of oppression can be difficult to detect when you benefit from them (we call this a privilege hazard later in the book). And this is where data come in: it was a set of intersecting systems of power and privilege that D?Yolanda Yang4 years agoPeople with privilege cannot recognize, even if they do, they are less likely to make any change, as this would decrease their benefit?Jillian McCarten2 years agoOne quote that I think of often is “when one has held a position of privilege for so long, equality feels like oppression.” ?Login to discuss.

      Important

    3. result of many unnamed colleagues and friends who may or may not have considered themselves feminists.

      The casting of many ripples. Positions of low power but high influence are important to cast these ripples.

    4. major systems of oppression are interlocking

      Burn it all down.

      But realistically, we cannot. So what is the next best option? We are fighting the good fight now, but how many of us and how long will it take?

    5. eminism begins with a belief in the “political, social, and economic equality of the sexes,”.d-undefined, .lh-undefined { background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2) !important; }1Michela Banks

      Good definition to share and use.